Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Viapath Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$220kYouth Development$127kCrime & Legal$30kEducation$15kArts & Culture$5kEmployment$5kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $132k
$10,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMART READING$15,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA$15,000
TOGETHER WE RISE CORPORATION$15,000
COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS$15,000
TEACHER'S PET DOGS AND KIDS LEARNING TOGETHER$12,000
THIS IS ME$10,000
SAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN$10,000
AMACHI PITTSBURGH$10,000
READING LEGACIES$10,000
OSBORNE ASSOCIATION$10,000
COMFORT CASES$10,000
HOPE TREE FAMILY SERVICES$9,500
BLESSED MINISTRIES INC$5,000
CITY OF REFUGE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $35k → 11%COMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS: $15k → 16%FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE: $5k → 14%COMFORT CASES: $10k → 8%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%COMFORT CASES: $10k → 8%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $10k → 11%COMFORT CASES INC: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Viapath Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Viapath Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$305k · 7 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$305k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    TOGETHER WE RISE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $55k · revenue +27%
  • RL
    READING LEGACIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • FA
    FAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • TW
    THE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

2
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
3
Family Tree Inc

Housing counseling

Human Services
4
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
5
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
6
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
7
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
8
Utah Youth Village

The mission of utah youth village is to empower children and families and help generations to come.

Human Services
9
Parenting With Intent

Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.

Human Services
10
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
11
Youth and Family Alliance

Youth and family alliance (dba lifeworks) is a fearless advocate for youth and young adults pursuing a life they love and a stable future for themselves and their families. we strive to break cycles of instability by providing support and…

Human Services
12
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of the National Capital Area and the most unlike its peers is Teachers Pet Dogs and Kids Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
5/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMACHI PITTSBURGH INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesAMACHI PITTSBURGH INCCOMFORT CASES INC — $45,000 · Human ServicesCOMFORT CASES INCCOMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS INCHOPE HOUSE — $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSEFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesUS DREAM ACADEMY INC — $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentUS DREAM ACADEMY INCREADING LEGACIES — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentREADING LEGACIESBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $25,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTE…THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · OtherTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATIO…THIS IS ME INC — $10,000 · OtherTHIS IS ME INCVIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES — $9,500 · OtherVIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILD…CITY OF REFUGE — $5,000 · OtherCITY OF REFUGEBlessed Ministries Inc — $5,000 · OtherBlessed Ministries IncTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDAT…TOGETHER WE RISE — $55,000 · Recreation & SportsTOGETHER WE RIS…SMART READING — $15,000 · EducationTEACHERS PET DOGS AND KIDS LEARNING — $12,000 · AnimalsSAFE STREETS CAMPAIGN — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$145,000Youth Development$90,000Other$79,500Recreation & Sports$55,000Education$15,000Animals$12,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMACHI PITTSBURGH INC — $70,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUS DREAM ACADEMY INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE — $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMFORT CASES INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREADING LEGACIES — $25,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA — $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMART READING — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FAMILY CENTERS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTEACHERS PET DOGS AND KIDS LEARNING — $12,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetHOPE HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetVIRGINIA BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES — $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY AND YOUTH INITIATIVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WONDERSEED FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Viapath Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Smart Reading3% of income from government
  • Comfort Cases Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Viapath Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Viapath Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph