Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vernon & Rowena Griffith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$689k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.8MHuman Services$1.9MHealth$1.8MReligion$225kYouth Development$163kEnvironment$85kArts & Culture$80kRecreation & Sports$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $377k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$250,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$175,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$75,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$71,580
WYO THEATER INC$55,000
ST PETERS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$25,000
GIRL SCOUTS$12,000
YOUTH INC$10,000
SHERIDAN COUNTY SOCCER ASSOC$5,000
THE FOOD GROUP$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE: $20k → 10%JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 19 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$7.1M
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

37%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YI
    YOUTH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
    3× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +9%
  • TF
    THE FOOD GROUP INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • SF
    SHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • SY
    SHERIDAN YOUTH BASEBALL
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • U
    UPRISING
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheridan Kids Life

Christian ministry reaching youth for christ in sheridan, wyoming and the surrounding areas.

Youth Development
2
Wyldflower Learning Community Inc

To provide students a learning environment where they can develop independence, cultivate passions, and grow the skill sets needed to be successful and fulfilled in life

—
3
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
4
Wyoming Sheep Foundation
Food & Nutrition
5
Sheridan Community Foundation

To support the sheridan community through charitable giving and to strengthen it with philanthropic education.

Philanthropy
6
Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming

Provide activities for low income children

Youth Development
7
Sheridan County Rodeo

The county rodeo organizes and operates the Wyo Rodeo that is nationally known. We pay out all of the monies to the contestants.

—
8
Child Development Center - Region Ii Inc

To offer special services for children birth through 5 years of age. the team of special educators, speech/language pathologists, and an occupational and physical therapists assess conceptual, reasoning, socialization, fine and gross…

Health
9
Sheridan Stadium Foundation Inc

To plan, construct, and improve multi purpose athletic/activity facilities for the residents of sheridan county, wyoming. also, provide funds to support children focused non-profit organizations.

Recreation & Sports
10
Shelby County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Promote the emotional and physical healing of child abuse victims

Human Services
11
Cares Inc

To serve victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and other crimes committted in big horn county, wyoming

Human Services
12
Wyoming Cares Inc

None

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheridan Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Uprising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHERIDAN COLLEGE: $2,512,900 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGESHERIDAN COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $1,900,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY SENIOR CENTERSHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $1,630,400 · OtherSHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALSHERIDAN CTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Other+16 more: $623,300 · Other+16 moreSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $85,000 · EnvironmentWYO THEATRE INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureSHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE: $20,000 · Human ServicesADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$6,916,600Environment$85,000Arts & Culture$80,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $90,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetYOUTH INC: $90,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $85,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetWYO THEATRE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetUPRISING: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WYO THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN FOSTER PARENT EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NOAH'S ARK CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UPRISING ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COUNTY SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JASON'S FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT28.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · The Roberts Family Foundation · George Foundation · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K Kibbee Foundation for Children · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · The Shaw & Betty Walker Foundation · Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vernon & Rowena Griffith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vernon & Rowena Griffith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vernon & Rowena Griffith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vernon & Rowena Griffith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vernon & Rowena Griffith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph