Skip to content

· Private foundation

Verna M Griffee Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$550kRecreation & Sports$750
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY$13,150
OHIO UNIVERSITY$10,750
OHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLE$6,200
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$4,150
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,650
OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY$2,250
MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY$2,250
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$2,250
PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE$2,250
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$2,250
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$2,250
HOCKING TECHNICAL COLLEGE$1,900
WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE$1,900
MARIETTA COLLEGE$1,500
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $2k → 16%WESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $750 → 13%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECH: $750 → 19%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $750 → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%MOUNT VERNON NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $1k → 13%OHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLE: $6k → 14%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $139 → 15%HOCKING TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 15%MARIETTA COLLEGE: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $4k → 16%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $1k → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $11k → 22%WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $2k → 19%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%ZANE STATE COLLEGE: $750 → 14%CAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 15%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
AR
NC
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$405k · 132 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

132 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 110 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

132
143

Total granted

$405k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+8%

Still filing today

10%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Marietta College
    4× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k · revenue +45%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • ZS
    ZANES STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • YS
    YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University; the most unlike its peers is Pensacola Christian College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 280 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
22/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO UNIVERSITY: $35,600 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $24,039 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYOHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLE: $20,800 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITY ZANESVILLEUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $20,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIKENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,250 · Other+165 more: $242,888 · Other+165 moreMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $52,800 · EducationMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITYMarietta College: $9,900 · EducationMarietta CollegeMount Vernon Nazarene University: $8,050 · EducationMount Vernon Nazarene Univers…ASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $5,700 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $4,750 · Education+25 more: $45,550 · Education+25 more
Other$356,077Education$126,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY: $52,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $9,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMount Vernon Nazarene University: $8,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $3,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOtterbein University: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHuntington University: $2,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $2,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $2,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEckerd College: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhio Northern University: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBURY UNIVERSITY: $1,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds Mount Vernon Nazarene University ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Huntington University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ruth M Hughes Scholarship TrustOH28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ruth M Hughes Scholarship Trust · Columbus Foundation · Ella Weiss Educational Fund · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Community Foundations Inc · Premier Bank Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Hoover Foundation Income Account · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Verna M Griffee Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Verna M Griffee Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Pensacola Christian College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 280 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Verna M Griffee’s filings →

More from the funding graph