· Public charity
Vermont Association of Hospitals & Health Systems Inc
As a collaborative voice and trusted partner, advance initiatives to support providers and patients and build healthy communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $2k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $528k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER INC | $48,547 |
| BRATTLEBORO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC | $48,547 |
| NORTH COUNTRY HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER INC (DBA NORTH COUNTRY HOSPITAL) | $48,547 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC | $48,547 |
| GIFFORD MEDICAL CENTER INC | $48,547 |
| CENTRAL VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC | $48,547 |
| CARLOS G OTIS HEALTH CARE CENTER INC (DBA GRACE COTTAGE HOSPITAL) | $48,547 |
| COPLEY HOSPITAL INC | $48,547 |
| THE BRATTLEBORO RETREAT | $48,544 |
| PORTER MEDICAL CENTER INC | $48,544 |
| RUTLAND HOSPITAL INC (DBA RUTLAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER) | $42,992 |
| SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL INC | $1,796 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER2× · 2020–2021 · $67k · revenue +51%
- GMGifford Medical Center Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $67k · revenue +28%
- CHCopley Hospital Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $67k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- SVSOUTHWESTERN VERMONT MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +31%
- WHWindsor Hospital Corporationgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +33%
- NVNortheastern Vermont Regional Hosp Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue +41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To achieve openness, inclusiveness, and public participation through strategic planning and decision making in identifying ways to better meet the healthcare needs of the community.
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
The mission of Valley Regional Hospital, Inc. is to improve community health, patient experience, and value. Our vision is to partner with the community to optimize health by ensuring access to high value health care.
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…
The mission of Windham Community Memorial Hospital is to offer comprehensive services in an environment where innovation and teaching are integral to care; where we are proud to serve patients and one another; where meeting the challenge…
CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
The mission of Gifford Health Care, Inc. and its subsidiaries is to enhance the health and well-being of our communities by providing excellent patient-centered care including senior living services.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.
Our Mission at Holyoke Medical Center is to improve the health of all people in our community. We do that with honesty, respect and dignity for our patients, visitors and staff. We do that through expert and compassionate care, education…
To be our community's trusted healthcare partner, committed to the health and well-being of those we serve with compassion, quality, and excellence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rutland Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Gifford Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Copley Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Carlos G Otis Health Care Center ↗
- Who funds Brattleboro Memorial Hospital ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern Medical Center ↗
- Who funds PORTER HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Brattleboro Retreat ↗
- Who funds Rutland Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds Springfield Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Windsor Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care Inc · Kinney Drugs Foundation Inc · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Vermont Association of Hospitals & Health Systems Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Windsor Hospital Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brattleboro Memorial Hospital — 1% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Southwestern Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Northwestern Medical Center — 0% of income from government
- Brattleboro Retreat — 0% of income from government
- Springfield Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Central Vermont Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gifford Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Copley Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rutland Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.