Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vera C Hendry Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$11k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

52% of Vera C Hendry Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Sonoma County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Vera C Hendry Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $42k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
6
’18
7
’19
3
’20
6
’21
7
’22
2
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$109kHuman Services$76kHealth$58kEducation$39kYouth Development$20kReligion$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Congregation Shir Shalom$11,000
Sonoma Valley Hospital Foundation$5,000
College Match co Community Partners$5,000
Friends in Sonoma Helping$5,000
Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance$5,000
Sonoma Valley Community Health Cent$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Sonoma Valley Education Foundation$2,500
Jewish Community Free Clinic$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Vintage House: $10k → 9%Vintage House: $10k → 9%Friends in Sonoma Helping: $5k → 9%Friends in Sonoma Helping: $5k → 9%Vintage House: $3k → 9%Vintage House: $2k → 9%Becoming Independent: $10k → 9%Becoming Independent: $3k → 9%Becoming Independent: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 10 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$162k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+132%

Still filing today

60%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +26%
  • VH
    Vintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center
    4× · 2018–2022 · $25k · revenue +76%
  • SV
    Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance
    4× · 2019–2023 · $20k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Foundation of Sonoma Coun
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • WG
    Women Giving As One Impact 100 Sono
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • CP
    CA Pacific Medical Center Foundatio
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
2
Sonoma Valley Community Health Center

To provide accessible, quality health care to those who need it, especially the underserved.

Unclassified
3
Sonoma County Conservation Action

Sonoma County Conservation Action's mission is to better our quality of life in Sonoma County for all generations, through educating and directly engaging the public on local environmental issues and policies using grassroots organizing.

—
4
Sonoma Valley Museum of Art

The Sonoma Valley Museum of Art is devoted to building community around art and presents four to five exhibitions per year and offers educational programs and events, actively engaging people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
5
Volunteer Center of Sonoma County

Connecting volunteers for a vibrant community.

—
6
Solano Family & Childrens Council Inc

Solano Family & Children's Services promotes and advocates for the well-being of children, their families, and child care providers by offering access to a variety of child care resources.

Human Services
7
Nami Sonoma County

NAMI Sonoma County's mission is to build better lives for individuals and families affected by mental illness throughout Sonoma County by providing education, support, and advocacy.

—
8
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
9
Sonoma Home Meals Inc

Provides meals daily to home bound seniors through volunteers who prepare and deliver the meals.

Food & Nutrition
10
Sonora Area Foundation

Strengthens its community through assisting donors, making grants, and providing leadership.

Philanthropy
11
Sonoma County Vintners Foundation

Sonoma county vintners foundation conducts and supports education programs related to the wine industry.

Community Improvement
12
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sonoma County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Jewish Community Free Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $88,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCSonoma Valley Education Foundation: $24,500 · PhilanthropySonoma Valley Education FoundationSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCommunity Foundation of Sonoma Coun: $25,000 · OtherCommunity Foundation of Sonoma CounCONGREGATION SHIR SHALOM: $16,800 · OtherCONGREGATION SHIR SHALOMSonoma Community Health Center: $15,000 · OtherSonoma Community Health CenterWomen Giving As One Impact 100 Sono: $11,200 · OtherWomen Giving As One Impact 100 SonoCA Pacific Medical Center Foundatio: $10,000 · OtherCA Pacific Medical Center FoundatioCollege Match co Community Partners: $7,000 · OtherCollege Match co Community PartnersCommunity Partners FBO College: $5,000 · OtherSonoma Valley Community Health Cent: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $9,500 · Other+4 moreVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center: $24,500 · Human ServicesVintage House Mu…Becoming Independent: $15,000 · Human ServicesBecoming Indepen…Friends In Sonoma Helping Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFriends In Sonom…SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 · HealthSONOMA VA…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthThe Jewish Community Free Clinic: $1,000 · HealthSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance: $20,000 · EducationWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalSonoma Ecology Center: $1,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$122,500Other$104,500Human Services$49,500Health$28,000Education$20,000International$5,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $88,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetVintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center: $24,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSonoma Valley Education Foundation: $24,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBecoming Independent: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFriends In Sonoma Helping Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA VALLEY TEEN SERVICES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Jewish Community Free Clinic: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSonoma Ecology Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vintage House Multi Purpose Senior Center ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma Valley Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Becoming Independent ↗
  • Who funds Friends In Sonoma Helping Inc ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SONOMA VALLEY TEEN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Jewish Community Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds Sonoma Ecology Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Simon Blattner Family Foundation · Sanderson Family Foundation · Women Giving as One Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Sonoma Valley Vintners & Growers Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The John & Sandra Leland Foundation · Kakatu Foundation Inc · The Vadasz Family Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vera C Hendry Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vera C Hendry Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vera C Hendry Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vera C Hendry Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vera C Hendry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph