Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ventana Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$183k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.5MHuman Services$1.1MArts & Culture$761kAnimals$478kReligion$210kFood & Nutrition$151kHealth$122kInternational$78kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $59k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOFFREY BALLET$50,000
JOHN G SHEDD AQUARIUM$50,000
ONE GOAL$25,000
MESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH$18,500
ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$15,000
ROCK PRAIRIE MONTESSORI SCHOOL$7,314
FORWARD MOMENTUM CHICAGO$5,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$5,000
TUCSON CONQUISTADOES FDN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MADONNA MISSION: $500 → 14%MADONNA MISSION: $100 → 14%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $15k → 15%YOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $10k → 15%JOURNEY CARE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 26 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
26

Total granted

$4.3M
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRISTO REY NETWORK
    6× · 2017–2022 · $550k · revenue +211%
  • SA
    SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $478k · revenue +67%
  • O
    ONEGOAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $254k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AH
    Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Lookingglass Theatre Company

Lookingglass theatre company is a national leader in the creation and presentation of innovative, cutting-edge theatrical work. lookingglass interweaves movement, circus arts and narrative in original and captivating ways. guided by an…

Arts & Culture
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
9
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMM FD OF SOUTHERN AZ: $955,000 · OtherCOMM FD OF SOUTHERN AZUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $601,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAMESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $203,500 · OtherMESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCHJOFFREY BALLET OF CHICAGO: $200,000 · OtherJOFFREY BALLET OF CHICAGOCASA DE SAN MIGUEL: $150,000 · OtherCASA DE SAN MIGUELIndividual grant recipient: $102,000 · Other+28 more: $420,501 · Other+28 moreCRISTO REY NETWORK: $550,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NETW…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $40,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITU…+2 more: $3,500 · EducationSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $478,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARI…+2 more: $251 · AnimalsTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $152,500 · Arts & CultureTHE JOFFR…KOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureKOHL CHIL…TRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTRAVERSE …FORWARD MOMENTUM CHICAGO: $25,000 · Arts & CultureFORWARD M…+4 more: $6,500 · Arts & CultureONEGOAL: $254,000 · Youth DevelopmentAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $30,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 · HealthYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 · Human ServicesElea Institute: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $600 · Human Services
Other$2,632,501Education$593,500Animals$478,251Arts & Culture$359,000Youth Development$254,000Health$40,000Human Services$27,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $550,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $478,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetONEGOAL: $254,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $152,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $120,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL: $55,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFORWARD MOMENTUM CHICAGO: $25,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSTART EARLY: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Conquistadores Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROCK PRAIRIE MONTESSORI INC: $7,314 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $6,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART TUCSON: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetElea Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna Mission: $600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $151 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET ↗
  • Who funds KOHL CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVERSE CITY FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds FORWARD MOMENTUM CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ROCK PRAIRIE MONTESSORI INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds Elea Institute ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ventana Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ventana Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ventana’s filings →

    More from the funding graph