Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vegfund Inc

VEGFUND PROVIDES GRANTS TO VEGAN ACTIVISTS TO ENABLE THEIR EDUCATIONAL OUTREACH TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF VEGAN LIVING.

$683k
Granted FY2023
270
Grants FY2023
36
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$3.2MAnimals$2.2MEnvironment$133kHealth$48kCivil Rights$27kArts & Culture$23kInternational$17kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 270 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k264 grants · $453k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $193k
$1,175
Median grant
36
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VEGANUARY$75,000
PROVEG (FKA VIVA LAS VEGA'S)$64,721
THE HUMANE LEAGUE$53,199
ANIMAL EQUALITY - SPAIN$13,448
FOOD FOR CLIMATE LEAGUE INC$12,500
ASSOCIACIA VEGETARIANA PORTUGUESA$10,572
A WELL FED WORLD$8,000
ANIMAL EQUALITY - MEXICO$7,658
BLACK VEGETARIAN SOCIETY OF MARYLAND$7,500
ONE STEP FOR ANIMALS$7,500
THE PLANTRICIAN PROJECT$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
FRIENDS OF HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL$7,500
ANIMAL EQUALITY - ITALY$7,500
ANIMAL EQUALITY - UNITED KINGDOM$7,287
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 49% of grant dollars ($2.8M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 51% that went abroad ($2.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT INC: $2k → 10%VEGMICHIGAN: $10k → 21%CHARTER FOR COMPASSION: $2k → 10%VEGMICHIGAN: $1k → 21%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $2k → 14%VEGMICHIGAN: $990 → 21%FOR MY KIDZ INC: $2k → 11%AUNTIE NA'S VILLAGE: $2k → 21%AUNTIE NA'S VILLAGE: $500 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 51% of all-years giving ($2.9M)

69 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Netherlands$774k · 11 grants
United Kingdom$654k · 75 grants
Spain$238k · 15 grants
Italy$144k · 18 grants
Canada$141k · 57 grants
Australia$122k · 22 grants
Israel$115k · 11 grants
Brazil$108k · 28 grants
India$64k · 9 grants
Denmark$52k · 14 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 226 repeat orgs$953k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

226 repeat relationships: 137 still active in FY2023, 89 since wound down; 133 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

226
304

Total granted

$4.8M
$770k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+1%

Still filing today

23%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23
AnimalsFood & NutritionEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $925k · revenue +213%
  • OS
    ONE STEP FOR ANIMALS
    3× · 2017–2023 · $165k · revenue +21%
  • RF
    Real Food for Kids
    3× · 2020–2022 · $63k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • EC
    EXPANDED CIRCLE COLLECTIVE-BETTER EATING
    one grant, 2020 · $47k
  • PB
    PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • PB
    PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +285%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
3
Middle East Vegan Society Inc

We firmly believe that the animal welfare and vegan community can significantly enhance their impact by extending their efforts to all corners of the world. Our dedication is to facilitate and contribute to this global outreach, striving…

—
4
Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary

Our mission at Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary is to provide a safe, loving and permanent home for rescued farmed animals whom are not accepted at most shelters. In addition to providing life-long care for the animals, we are dedicated to…

Animals
5
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
6
Animal Place

To provide refuge for unwanted farmed animals, to further their welfare through education of the public and to foster ethics of compassion and responsibility towards nonhuman animals by advocating a vegan lifestyle.

Animals
7
Vegan Coalition

This organization was formed to promote the vegan lifestyle and to promote respect and care for all animals.

Animals
8
Karma Farm Sanctuary Inc
Animals
9
Animal Protection and Rescue League Inc

Exposing and eliminating animal cruelty.

Animals
10
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
11
Animal & Vegan Advocacy International Inc

Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…

Animals
12
Planted Society

We partner with brands restaurants and communities to inspire plant-based eating everywhere by providing free assistance including marketing PR and consultation.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Outlook Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 663 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/118
Grantees still filing
76/118
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROVEG(FKA VIVA LAS VEGA'S): $755,293 · OtherPROVEG(FKA VIVA LAS VEGA'S)VEGANUARY: $430,000 · OtherVEGANUARYANIMAL EQUALITY - SPAIN: $175,013 · Other+144 more: $1,998,912 · Other+144 moreTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $925,237 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUEONE STEP FOR ANIMALS: $165,336 · AnimalsONE STEP FOR ANIMALS+25 more: $358,435 · Animals+25 moreA Well-Fed World: $42,790 · Food & NutritionBLACK VEGETARIAN SOCIETY OF MARYLAND: $31,690 · Food & NutritionFood Empowerment Project: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS: $19,400 · Food & NutritionAPLANTBASEDDIET ORG INC: $17,465 · Food & NutritionREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · Food & NutritionNew Roots Institute: $12,019 · Food & NutritionCRUELTY FREE YOU PLUS ME: $10,896 · Food & NutritionBEYOND CARNISM INC: $8,870 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL REGION VEGAN NETWORK: $8,209 · Food & Nutrition+4 more: $20,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $53,048 · EnvironmentFOOD FOR CLIMATE LEAGUE: $12,500 · EnvironmentBRIGHTER GREEN INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentHUMANE EDUCATION ADVOCATES REACHING TEACHERS: $5,000 · EnvironmentEARTH DAY NETWORK INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentReal Food for Kids: $62,500 · Youth DevelopmentPower is Giving Inc: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentPeace Advocacy Network: $22,361 · EducationEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $17,500 · EducationKing Charter Schools Inc: $6,500 · EducationHEALTHY KIDS HAPPY PLANET: $3,957 · EducationPLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,359,218Animals$1,449,008Food & Nutrition$206,839Environment$83,048Youth Development$70,500Education$50,318Community Improvement$35,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $925,237 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetONE STEP FOR ANIMALS: $165,336 over 3y, 17% of budgetReal Food for Kids: $62,500 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $53,048 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $42,790 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetACTASIA INC: $40,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetSENTIENT MEDIA: $38,750 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetUnchainedTV: $37,005 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetPLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION: $35,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetBLACK VEGETARIAN SOCIETY OF MARYLAND: $31,690 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetROCHESTER LIFESTYLE MEDICINE INSTITUTE: $31,200 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $26,273 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Raven Corps: $25,200 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetPeace Advocacy Network: $22,361 over 3y, 22% of budgetFood Empowerment Project: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS: $19,400 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE ACTION FOR ANIMALS: $17,521 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Plantrician Project: $17,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAPLANTBASEDDIET ORG INC: $17,465 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetFAUNALYTICS: $16,890 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAFRICA NETWORK FOR ANIMAL WELFARE USA: $14,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $12,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR CLIMATE LEAGUE: $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $12,019 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetVEGMICHIGAN: $11,990 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetAnimal Rights Coalition Inc: $11,269 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCRUELTY FREE YOU PLUS ME: $10,896 over 3y, 10% of budgetHumane Action Pittsburgh: $10,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetNET IMPACT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP: $10,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTHE VIRSA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetLast Chance for Animals: $8,994 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEYOND CARNISM INC: $8,870 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCAPITAL REGION VEGAN NETWORK: $8,209 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL RIGHTS COALITION: $8,105 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetSPECIES UNITE 23 INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetINDRALOKA ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTER GREEN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetRowdy Girl Sanctuary Inc: $6,750 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetEncompass Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetA TABLE IN THE WILDERNESS: $6,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetRETHINK YOUR FOOD INC: $5,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAMERLAINE FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,384 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAllied Scholars for Animal Protection: $5,200 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds ONE STEP FOR ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Real Food for Kids ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds A Well-Fed World ↗
  • Who funds ACTASIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SENTIENT MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds UnchainedTV ↗
  • Who funds VEGAN JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PLANT BASED FOODS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BLACK VEGETARIAN SOCIETY OF MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER LIFESTYLE MEDICINE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AKASHINGA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Raven Corps ↗
  • Who funds Peace Advocacy Network ↗
  • Who funds Food Empowerment Project ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Quinn FoundationKS58.3× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Quinn Foundation · Animal Charity Evaluators · A Well-Fed World · The Greenbaum Foundation · Karuna Foundation · Nalith Inc · Humane America Animal Foundation · The Summerlee Foundation · Tipping Point Private Foundation · Builders Vision Foundation · Aceso Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vegfund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vegfund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Newark Community Street Team Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Inc: 23% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Vegfund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Vegfund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 663 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vegfund’s filings →

More from the funding graph