Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aceso Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$277k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.4MAnimals$1.6MEnvironment$854kYouth Development$460kPhilanthropy$400kHuman Services$310kArts & Culture$255kCommunity Improvement$210kOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $97k
  • $50k–250k38 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+2 grants · $527k
$100,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ROOTS INSTITUTE$277,000
NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST$250,000
COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA$210,000
ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS$200,000
CITY BLOSSOMS$190,000
NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT$160,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
PROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE$130,000
VICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE$125,000
GREENER BY DEFAULT$110,000
REUNITY RESOURCES$109,450
PHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT$104,987
COMMON GOOD CITY FARM$101,300
THE WALLS PROJECT$100,000
A WELL-FED WORLD$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $310k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $210k → 17%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING USA: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
DE
NM
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 19 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$4.0M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+20%

Still filing today

95%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Food & NutritionAnimalsEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    New Roots Institute
    2× · 2023–2024 · $377k · revenue +110%
  • NORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $350k · revenue +2%
  • CI
    Compassion in World Farming Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $310k · revenue +181%

Funded once

  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $325k · revenue +20%
  • INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $155k · revenue -15%
  • AF
    ALL FARMERS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $148k · revenue -38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
2
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
3
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Project Association

FarmSTAND uses legal advocacy and public education to address the environmental, labor, and animal welfare impacts of industrial agriculture and to support the viability of small family farmers.

Crime & Legal
5
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
6
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

—
8
Zero Foodprint

Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
10
Equitable Food Initiative

EFIs mission is to transform the produce industry and the lives of farmworkers by facilitating collaboration among workers, agricultural employers, retail buyers and consumer advocates.

Human Services
11
Sustainable Growers
—
12
Global Food Partners Inc

Global food partners ("gfp") is an animal protection organization whose mission is to help food businesses meet their cage-free egg commitments and producers implement cage-free best practices.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Better Food Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Karuna Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Local Food System Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%47%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%49%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%0%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,510

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
28/55
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

New Roots Institute — $377,000 · Food & NutritionNew Roots InstitutePROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP — $180,000 · Food & NutritionPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORPCommon Good City Farm — $177,300 · Food & NutritionCommon Good City FarmPLANT IT FORWARD — $175,000 · Food & NutritionPLANT IT FORWARDFOOD & WATER WATCH — $170,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD & WATER WATCHALL FARMERS INC — $148,000 · Food & NutritionALL FARMERS INCSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC — $126,012 · Food & NutritionSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTUR…GREENER BY DEFAULT — $110,000 · Food & NutritionGLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC — $103,300 · Food & NutritionLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $100,000 · Food & NutritionREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionA Well-Fed World — $100,000 · Food & NutritionBALANCED INC — $100,000 · Food & NutritionBETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 · Food & NutritionCULTIVATING COMMUNITY — $78,700 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $165,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 moreTHE HUMANE LEAGUE — $325,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUEANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS — $300,000 · AnimalsANIMAL CHARITY EVAL…ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC — $125,000 · AnimalsANIMAL OUTLOOK INCSENTIENT MEDIA — $108,000 · AnimalsSENTIENT MEDIAANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 · AnimalsANIMAL DEFENSE PART…ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $100,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENS…Animal Equality — $92,000 · AnimalsAnimal EqualityLEGAL IMPACT FOR CHICKENS — $85,000 · AnimalsLEGAL IMPACT FOR CH…Advancing Law For Animals — $70,754 · AnimalsLEADERS FOR ETHICS ANIMALS & THE PLANET — $47,400 · Animals+2 more — $50,000 · AnimalsNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $350,000 · EnvironmentNORTHEAST WILDERNE…VICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE INC — $243,000 · EnvironmentVICTORY GARDEN INI…REUNITY RESOURCES — $209,450 · EnvironmentREUNITY RESOURCESPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT INC — $104,987 · EnvironmentPHILADELPHIA ORCHA…SOUTHERN PLAINS LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN PLAINS LA…Planting Justice — $100,000 · EnvironmentPlanting JusticeTHE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST — $100,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS LAN…KENTUCKY NATURAL LANDS TRUST INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentKENTUCKY NATURAL L…Urban Tilth — $75,000 · EnvironmentUrban Tilth+1 more — $20,000 · EnvironmentIndividual grant recipient — $525,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGROWING TOGETHER — $100,000 · OtherANIMAL AND VEGAN ADVOCACY SUMMIT — $100,000 · OtherESPERANZA COMMUNITY FARM — $92,200 · OtherFARM FORWARD — $85,000 · OtherCompassion in World Farming Inc — $310,000 · OtherCompassion in World Farming…NEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT — $290,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PRO…INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY F…THE WALLS PROJECT — $100,000 · OtherURBAN ROOTS GARDEN CLASSROOMS — $85,600 · Other+4 more — $142,720 · Other+4 moreGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $400,000 · PhilanthropyKARUNA FOUNDATION — $60,000 · PhilanthropyCITY BLOSSOMS INC — $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentSoul Food Project Inc — $75,548 · Youth DevelopmentSeedleaf Inc — $157,940 · Community ImprovementNORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT — $100,000 · Community ImprovementKEEP GROWING DETROIT — $75,000 · Community Improvement
Food & Nutrition$2,290,312Animals$1,403,154Environment$1,377,437Other$1,986,020Philanthropy$460,000Youth Development$435,548Community Improvement$332,940

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Roots Institute — $377,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNORTHEAST WILDERNESS TRUST CORPORATION — $350,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE — $325,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCompassion in World Farming Inc — $310,000 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS — $300,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD LAND POWER PROJECT — $290,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetCITY BLOSSOMS INC — $260,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetVICTORY GARDEN INITIATIVE INC — $243,000 over 3y, 34% of budgetREUNITY RESOURCES — $209,450 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP — $180,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetCommon Good City Farm — $177,300 over 2y, 10% of budgetPLANT IT FORWARD — $175,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $170,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSeedleaf Inc — $157,940 over 3y, 19% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $155,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALL FARMERS INC — $148,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AGRICULTURE PROJECT INC — $126,012 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC — $125,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetGREENER BY DEFAULT — $110,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetSENTIENT MEDIA — $108,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ORCHARD PROJECT INC — $104,987 over 1y, 15% of budgetGLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC — $103,300 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTHERN PLAINS LAND TRUST INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNORRIS SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT — $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPlanting Justice — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE WALLS PROJECT — $100,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetA Well-Fed World — $100,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST — $100,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetBALANCED INC — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAnimal Equality — $92,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetURBAN ROOTS GARDEN CLASSROOMS — $85,600 over 1y, 10% of budgetLEGAL IMPACT FOR CHICKENS — $85,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBETTER FOOD FOUNDATION INC — $80,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetCULTIVATING COMMUNITY — $78,700 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetSoul Food Project Inc — $75,548 over 2y, 17% of budgetKENTUCKY NATURAL LANDS TRUST INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKEEP GROWING DETROIT — $75,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUrban Tilth — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAdvancing Law For Animals — $70,754 over 1y, 45% of budgetFARM ALLIANCE OF BALTIMORE INC — $60,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetKARUNA FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetRIO GRANDE COMMUNITY FARMS — $55,000 over 2y, 26% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Quinn FoundationThe Greenbaum Foundat…PatagoniaorgClif Family FoundationAnimal Charity Evalua…Builders Vision Found…Rsf Social Finance IncImpactassetsincHumane America Animal…Tipping Point Private…Effective Ventures Fo…Vegfund Inc
The Quinn FoundationKS42.8× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Quinn Foundation · The Greenbaum Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Clif Family Foundation · Animal Charity Evaluators · Builders Vision Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Impactassetsinc · Humane America Animal Foundation · Tipping Point Private Foundation · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Vegfund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aceso Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • All Farmers Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aceso Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Aceso Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines