Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

VC Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$732k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.2MReligion$1.2MEducation$921kHousing & Shelter$163kYouth Development$145kHuman Services$98kFood & Nutrition$97kCrime & Legal$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $333k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $390k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal Churc$152,317
New Heights Church$150,000
ALS Association of Oregon and SW Wa$88,000
Ovarian Cancer of OR SW WA$42,317
Family Promise of Tualatin Valley$30,000
La Salle Catholic College Prepatory$30,000
Meals On Wheels of Contra Costa$20,000
Habitat for Humanity East Bay$20,000
Hull Foundation$20,000
Columbia Gorge CASA$20,000
St John Fisher$17,000
Hood River Composite$15,000
Altadena United Methodist Church$15,000
St Mark's Episcopal Church$15,000
Western Seminary$14,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ROAD TO HOPE: $7k → 8%ROAD TO HOPE: $2k → 8%Family Promise of Tualatin Valley: $30k → 8%Family Promise of Tualatin Valley: $11k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
NY
OR
CA
CO
MO
KY
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 41 repeat orgs$641k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
30

Total granted

$3.5M
$548k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+14%

Still filing today

44%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WEST HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $614k · revenue +26%
  • Victory Academy Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $120k · revenue +42%
  • CG
    COLUMBIA GORGE CASA
    5× · 2020–2025 · $64k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • VA
    VICTOR ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $85k
  • HC
    Heartland Church
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • WC
    WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
3
American Adoptions of California Dba Family Connection Christian Adoption

Family connections christian adoptions exists to assist the waiting children of the world into permanent, loving families. it is our belief that god's love is best expressed in the family. the work of fcca is a living expression of our…

Unclassified
4
Columbia Gorge Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Columbia Gorge Habitat for Humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
5
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
6
Covenant House California

Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.

Human Services
7
Ywca of Greater Portland

To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
8
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
9
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
10
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
11
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
12
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Home and the most unlike its peers is Metro Portland New Car Dealers Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr12%24%35–55yr13%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr18%7%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr13%54%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
13%
3,452/26,823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALS ASSOCIATION OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON — $497,200 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTONSt Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal Churc — $412,317 · OtherSt Gregory of Nyssa Episcopal ChurcNew Heights Church — $360,000 · OtherNew Heights ChurchALS Association of Oregon and SW Wa — $202,500 · OtherALS Association of Oregon and SW WaJDRF — $139,000 · OtherSt John Fisher — $107,000 · Other+54 more — $1,236,788 · Other+54 moreWEST HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $613,500 · EducationWEST HILLS CHRISTIAN SC…Victory Academy Inc — $120,000 · EducationVictory Academy IncWESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationWESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH…PACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION — $43,000 · Education+3 more — $25,750 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterWinter Nights Family Shelter Inc — $35,000 · Housing & ShelterShepherds Gate — $16,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLUMBIA GORGE CASA — $64,000 · Crime & LegalKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $22,000 · Crime & LegalFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc — $6,000 · Crime & LegalYOUNG LIFE — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $30,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionFISH Food Bank — $5,000 · Food & NutritionFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley — $41,000 · Human ServicesROAD TO HOPE ROAD 2 HOPE MATERNITY HOMES — $9,000 · Human Services
Other$2,954,805Education$852,250Housing & Shelter$102,000Crime & Legal$92,000Youth Development$57,500Food & Nutrition$55,000Human Services$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $613,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetVictory Academy Inc — $120,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCOLUMBIA GORGE CASA — $64,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC — $56,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION — $43,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFamily Promise of Tualatin Valley — $41,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWinter Nights Family Shelter Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetFISH — $34,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPASSION FIRST — $33,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDiscovery Counseling Center — $26,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE UNLIMITED FAMILY CARE CENTER — $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $22,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetStillman College — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Good Shepherd Gracenter of San Francisco — $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetShepherds Gate — $16,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF THE RIVER REGION — $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLuis Palau Association — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROAD TO HOPE ROAD 2 HOPE MATERNITY HOMES — $9,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMETRO PORTLAND NEW CAR DEALERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFISH Food Bank — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHOOD RIVER NEW SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLadybug CDH Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPATH HOME — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds Victory Academy Inc
  • Who funds COLUMBIA GORGE CASA
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds PACIFIC SCHOOL OF RELIGION
  • Who funds Family Promise of Tualatin Valley
  • Who funds Winter Nights Family Shelter Inc
  • Who funds FISH
  • Who funds COMPASSION FIRST
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds Discovery Counseling Center
  • Who funds HOPE UNLIMITED FAMILY CARE CENTER
  • Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER
  • Who funds Stillman College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salesforce FoundationCA16× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salesforce Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Greenfish Foundation · Charis Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization VC Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 48%
  • Helping Hands Against Violence Inc48% of income from government
  • Columbia Gorge Casa1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to VC Fund?

Find your warmest path to VC Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph