Skip to content

· Private foundation

Vaughn T Baird Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$229kEducation$15kHealth$11kInternational$7kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$4kCrime & Legal$4k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$501k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAST-WEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
REDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
DISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED$3,500
CROSSPOINT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,000
KENAI CLASSICAL SCHOOL$2,000
COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND$1,500
FIRST STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST$1,500
TEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,500
JAIL MINISTRY$1,500
HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER$1,500
THE NAVIGATORS$1,500
TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,500
RANSOMED LIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RANSOMED LIFE: $1k → 16%RANSOMED LIFE: $1k → 16%RANSOMED LIFE: $1k → 16%RANSOMED LIFE: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$269k · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$269k
$1k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +40%
  • CF
    COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • TE
    TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEMPLE BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
2
Dozen Ministries

Religious

Religion
3
Act 13 Christian Ministries

Acts 13 christian ministries is dedicated to fulfilling the command of our lord jesus christ to spread the gospel among the unsaved, and strengthen the church-at-large through the proclamation of much-needed, yet often neglected, truths…

Religion
4
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
5
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
6
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
7
Go and Tell Ministries Inc

Go & Tell Ministries exists to teach and proclaim the Gospel message to the ends of the earth through the use of teaching, preaching and social outreach programs.

Religion
8
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
9
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
10
Discipleship Training Ministries

Our mission is to establish, train and encourage followers of Jesus Christ to grow in their faith, and become active in serving Him.

—
11
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
12
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ransomed Life Inc; the most unlike its peers is Computers for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

East-West Ministries International: $181,000 · ReligionEast-West Ministries InternationalSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,300 · ReligionREDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $14,500 · OtherREDEEMER PRESBYTERIAN CHURC…CROSSPOINT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13,500 · OtherCROSSPOINT PRESBYTERIAN CHU…THE NAVIGATORS: $5,300 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND: $5,300 · OtherCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLINDFIRST STREET CHURCH OF CHRIST: $5,300 · OtherFIRST STREET CHURCH OF CHRI…JAIL MINISTRY: $5,300 · OtherJAIL MINISTRYTEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,300 · OtherTEMPLE COLLEGE FOUNDATION S…DISCIPLES UNLIMITED: $4,800 · OtherDISCIPLES UNLIMITEDKENAI CLASSICAL SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherKENAI CLASSICAL SCHOOLMISSION TO THE WORLD: $3,000 · Other+1 more: $1,300 · OtherTEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 · EducationHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $5,300 · HealthRANSOMED LIFE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC: $3,500 · Crime & Legal
Religion$188,300Other$67,600Education$5,300Health$5,300Human Services$4,000Crime & Legal$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEast-West Ministries International: $181,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND: $5,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,300 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJAIL MINISTRY: $5,300 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $5,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRANSOMED LIFE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTERS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAIL MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RANSOMED LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLESHIP UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Vaughn T Baird Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Vaughn T Baird Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Vaughn T Baird Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Vaughn T Baird Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Vaughn T Baird’s filings →

    More from the funding graph