Skip to content
Valley View Hospital Association at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Valley View Hospital Association

Caring for you and your family, one patient at a time.

$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$920kRecreation & Sports$156kEducation$145kPhilanthropy$53kArts & Culture$43kYouth Development$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $214,083, the rows itemized in this filing. The $240,233 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,150 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$679M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIND SPRINGS HEALTH INC$100,000
RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC$28,394
THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC$15,439
ROARING FORK VALLEY SOCCER CLUB (ROARING FORK UNITED)$12,000
MOUNTAIN RECREATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT (MOUNTAIN RECREATION FOUNDATION)$10,250
ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB$10,000
MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL$10,000
5POINT FILM FESTIVAL$7,500
ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$7,500
ROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION$7,000
ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL: $75k → 6%MOUNTAIN RECREATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT: $32k → 7%MOUNTAIN RECREATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT (MOUNTAIN RECREATION FOUNDATION): $10k → 8%Garfield County Emergency Communications Authority: $10k → 10%Mind Springs Health Inc: $250k → 11%COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $50k → 36%ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB: $20k → 6%Valley View Hospital Foundation: $138k → 8%Mind Springs Health Inc: $100k → 11%ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1: $20k → 6%Valley View Hospital Foundation: $128k → 8%MIND SPRINGS HEALTH INC: $100k → 11%CROWN MOUNTAIN PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT: $15k → 6%Valley View Hospital Foundation: $100k → 8%ROARING FORK VALLEY SOCCER CLUB (ROARING FORK UNITED): $12k → 6%RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER: $51k → 8%Basalt Soccer Club Inc DBA Roaring Fork United: $12k → 6%RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $28k → 8%ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB: $10k → 6%THREE RIVERS LITTLE LEAGUE: $10k → 8%MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL: $10k → 6%ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB: $10k → 6%5POINT FILM FESTIVAL: $10k → 6%5Point Film Festival: $10k → 6%5 point film festival: $8k → 6%5POINT FILM FESTIVAL: $8k → 6%5POINT FILM FESTIVAL: $8k → 6%THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $15k → 6%THE BUDDY PROGRAM: $15k → 6%Aspen Community Foundation: $8k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%Aspen Community Foundation: $8k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8k → 6%ROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION - RFMBA: $8k → 6%ROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION: $7k → 6%ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$797k · 8 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$797k
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+30%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VV
    VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $366k · revenue -20%
  • CW
    COLORADO WEST INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue -63%
  • RB
    RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2018–2024 · $79k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CW
    COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue -1%
  • BL
    BLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +13%
  • CM
    COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Extreme Hockey Association Sheldon Wolitski

Colorado extreme hockey association is dedicated to nurturing the talents of young boys and girls in the roaring fork mid-valley region.

Recreation & Sports
2
Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education
3
Boulder County United Fka Fc Boulder

Providing the opportunity for all levels of soccer players ages 4-19 to come together and compete in a suitable environment while stitching together the diversity of community, focusing on building the character players and coaches that…

Recreation & Sports
4
Team Summit

Team summit is a youth development organization empowering our athletes to realize and celebrate their personal podiums through athletics, education and life skills by participating in innovative programming at our world class venues.

Recreation & Sports
5
Boulder County Injured and Fallen Officer Foundation
Public Safety & Disaster
6
Vail Valley Mountain Bike Association

The VVMTA's mission is to connect our coummunity to the outdoors through sustainable recreation. The VVMTA advocates for soft surface trails, manages trail stewardship programs, maintains and builds trails, coordinates and trains…

Environment
7
Team Breckenridge Sports Club Inc

It is our mission to provide this community with an athletic environment that allows each athlete to reach their potential and pursue their life's goals through through snow sports.

Recreation & Sports
8
Aspen Skiing Company Environment Foundation

The aspen skiing company environment foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the enhancement and protection of the environmental quality of the roaring fork valley region. we support projects that promote environmental…

Philanthropy
9
Boulder Mountainbike Alliance

The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…

Recreation & Sports
10
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
11
Big Sky Ski Education Foundation

Big Sky Ski Education Foundation offers competitive Alpine, Freeride, and Nordic skiing programs.

—
12
Rocky Mountain Sport Riders Inc

The purpose of the corporation shall be the promotion and preservation of the sport of off road motorcycling including preserving, managing, and expanding riding opportunities for the public benefit.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado West Inc; the most unlike its peers is 5Point Film Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $365,600 · HealthVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $250,000 · HealthCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INCCOLORADO WEST INC: $200,000 · HealthCOLORADO WEST INCRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $79,394 · HealthRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INCCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE: $50,000 · OtherCOLORADO MOUNTAIN…ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB: $40,000 · OtherROARING FORK LACR…MOUNTAIN RECREATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT: $32,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN RECREATI…THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $30,439 · OtherTHE BUDDY PROGRAM…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK SCHOOLS: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE C…CROWN MOUNTAIN PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT: $15,000 · OtherCROWN MOUNTAIN PA…MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · OtherGarfield County Emergency Communications Authority: $10,000 · OtherBLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL INC: $75,000 · EducationBasalt Soccer Club Inc dba Roaring Fork United: $24,000 · Recreation & SportsROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION - RFMBA: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMountain Recreation Foundation: $10,250 · Recreation & SportsTHREE RIVERS LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $52,500 · Philanthropy5Point Film Festival: $42,500 · EnvironmentEPIC EXPERIENCE: $25,000 · Human ServicesASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $6,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$894,994Other$207,439Education$75,000Recreation & Sports$59,250Philanthropy$52,500Environment$42,500Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $365,600 over 3y, 11% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC: $79,394 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budget5Point Film Festival: $42,500 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $30,439 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetEPIC EXPERIENCE: $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetBasalt Soccer Club Inc dba Roaring Fork United: $24,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION - RFMBA: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMountain Recreation Foundation: $10,250 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetTHREE RIVERS LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetMOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Colorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Aspen Community FoundationCO19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valley View Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valley View Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Valley View Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home