· Public charity
Valley View Hospital Association
Caring for you and your family, one patient at a time.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $214,083 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $240,233 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,150 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $86k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MIND SPRINGS HEALTH INC | $100,000 |
| RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC | $28,394 |
| THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC | $15,439 |
| ROARING FORK VALLEY SOCCER CLUB (ROARING FORK UNITED) | $12,000 |
| MOUNTAIN RECREATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT (MOUNTAIN RECREATION FOUNDATION) | $10,250 |
| MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| ROARING FORK LACROSSE CLUB | $10,000 |
| 5POINT FILM FESTIVAL | $7,500 |
| ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| ROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION | $7,000 |
| ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VVVALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2020 · $366k · revenue -4%
- CWCOLORADO WEST INC2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue -63%
- RBRIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC2× · 2018–2024 · $79k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CWCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INCone grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue -1%
- BLBLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL INCone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +13%
- CMCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGEone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
COMBA is dedicated to protecting and improving mountain biking on the Colorado Front Range.
Colorado extreme hockey association is dedicated to nurturing the talents of young boys and girls in the roaring fork mid-valley region.
Providing the opportunity for all levels of soccer players ages 4-19 to come together and compete in a suitable environment while stitching together the diversity of community, focusing on building the character players and coaches that…
The VVMTA's mission is to connect our coummunity to the outdoors through sustainable recreation. The VVMTA advocates for soft surface trails, manages trail stewardship programs, maintains and builds trails, coordinates and trains…
Team summit is a youth development organization empowering our athletes to realize and celebrate their personal podiums through athletics, education and life skills by participating in innovative programming at our world class venues.
The aspen skiing company environment foundation is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the enhancement and protection of the environmental quality of the roaring fork valley region. we support projects that promote environmental…
Big Sky Ski Education Foundation offers competitive Alpine, Freeride, and Nordic skiing programs.
The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…
Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.
We lead a passionate and growing movement that champions the interests of everyone who rides or wants to ride a bicycle in our state.
To support, nourish, and enrich our community by providing informative, entertaining and educational radio and digital programing in a reliable and professional manner.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado West Inc and the most unlike its peers is 5Point Film Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WEST INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER BRIDGE REGIONAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE LAKE PRESCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 5Point Film Festival ↗
- Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds EPIC EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds Basalt Soccer Club Inc dba Roaring Fork United ↗
- Who funds ROARING FORK MOUNTAIN BIKE ASSOCIATION - RFMBA ↗
- Who funds Mountain Recreation Foundation ↗
- Who funds THREE RIVERS LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SOPRIS NORDIC COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN JUNIOR HOCKEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Valley View Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.