· Public charity
Valley Kids Foundation
The VALLEY KIDS FOUNDATION is a non-profit organization created and managed by the valley of the sun active 20-30 club.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $135,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $150,800 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE FOSTER ALLIANCE | $25,000 |
| CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S CANCER NETWORK | $20,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE | $20,000 |
| AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS | $20,000 |
| MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA | $10,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH ARIZONA | $10,000 |
| RYAN HOUSE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +13%
- CCCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA4× · 2022–2025 · $78k · revenue +18%
- BDBALLER DREAM FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +37%
Funded once
Best Buddies International Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +43%- MSMITCHELL SWABACK CHARITIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +67%
- HIHOPEKIDS INCgraduated2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…
Organization - kids beating cancer, inc., (kbc) is a nonprofit, nonstock florida corporation formed in 1992. kbc provides access to life-saving treatments through the science of cellular therapy and advancing pediatric innovative, novel,…
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Aviva children's services changes the lives of more than 3,000 children in foster care each year by providing emergency resources, ongoing family support and comprehensive behavioral health services.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
The make-a-wish foundation of nevada creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Arizona Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds RYAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL SWABACK CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF ARIZONA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Thunderbirds Charities · Arizona Community Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · American Express Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Valley Kids Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.