Skip to content
Valley Health System at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Valley Health System

To support and encourage healthcare and related services through providing financial, management, and other assistance to its affiliates and other organizations and through all other relevant means.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$210k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.1MCrime & Legal$335kHuman Services$299kEducation$279kHousing & Shelter$175kEmployment$100kArts & Culture$55kYouth Development$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 24 grants below total $1,153,695, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,210,075 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,380 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $875k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$111M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC$210,000
OUR HEALTH$185,000
NSV SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION$155,000
Winchester Rescue Mission$125,000
Winchester Medical Ctr Found$100,000
Horizon Goodwill Industries$100,000
SHENANDOAH APPLE BLOSSOM$38,500
Chamber of Commerce$27,195
Mountaineer Community Health$25,000
WATTS$25,000
Lord Fairfax EMS Council$20,000
ST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC$20,000
SHENANDOAH CO FREE CLINIC$20,000
Top of Virginia$12,500
Page One of Page County$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $250k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE LAUREL CENTER: $48k → 16%CHILD SAFE CENTER: $30k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $21k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $21k → 16%THE LAUREL CENTER: $21k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $21k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $20k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $19k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $14k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $12k → 16%FAITH IN ACTION: $11k → 16%CHILD SAFE CENTER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 24 repeat orgs$442k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$7.0M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-12%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $426k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OUR HEALTH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +52% · 46% of their budget
  • NS
    NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY SUBSTANCE USE COALITION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $575k · revenue +19%
  • SL
    ST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $447k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • LV
    LITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -12%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Free Clinic of Franklin County Inc

The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.

—
2
Warren-Vance Community Health Center Inc

The clinic provides primary healthcare in a spirit of compassion to limited income persons who are without adequate health insurance benefits in warren and vance counties, north carolina.

Health
3
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
4
Shenandoah Valley Medical System I

To promote health and wellness within the community by providing a medical home to reduce barriers to care and ensure access to a full range of coordinated health care and wellness services.

Health
5
Greene Care Clinic

To provide free medical care to the working uninsured citizens in greene county, virginia.

Health
6
St Charles Health Council Inc

To promote and provide quality primary health care that is accessible, affordable, and community-based for the people of southwest virginia.

—
7
Free Clinic of the New River Valley Inc

The purpose of the Community Health Center of the New River Valley (CHCNRV) is to provide affordable and high quality medical, dental, behavioral, and preventive health care services to people of all ages and circumstances, regardless of…

—
8
Fauquier Free Clinic Inc

The free clinic offers quality medical, dental and mental health care to residents of fauquier and rappahannock counties who lack appropriate alternatives for these services.

—
9
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
10
Free Clinic of Central Virginia Inc

The primary exempt purpose of the free clinic of central virginia, inc. is to provide free medical, dental, and pharmaceutical care to indigent persons.

Health
11
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
12
West Virginia Community Voices Inc

To improve the health and health care quality for the residents of west virginia.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shenandoah County Free Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wheels for Wellness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
18/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,395,085 · HealthDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INCNORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY SUBSTANCE USE COALITION: $575,000 · HealthNORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY SUBSTANCE USE COALITIONST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $447,403 · HealthST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INCSHENANDOAH COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC: $382,500 · HealthSHENANDOAH COUNTY FREE CLINIC INCVIRGINIA UNITED INCORPORATED: $175,709 · HealthLORD FAIRFAX EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $164,000 · Health+7 more: $320,291 · Health+7 moreOUR HEALTH INC: $1,282,596 · Community ImprovementOUR HEALTH INCAIDS RESPONSE EFFORT INC D/B/A/ COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $200,000 · OtherAIDS RESPON…VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM: $100,000 · OtherVALLEY HEAL…LAUREL RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 · OtherLAUREL RIDG…CONCERN HOTLINE INC: $78,500 · OtherCONCERN HOT…CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FRONT ROYAL: $27,195 · OtherHAGERSTOWN GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $100,000 · OtherHAGERSTOWN …SHENANDOAH APPLE BLOSSOM FESTIVAL INCORPORATED: $48,500 · OtherSHENANDOAH …PAGE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $48,065 · OtherPAGE ALLIAN…+6 more: $68,800 · Other+6 moreMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $295,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $112,001 · Human ServicesWINCHESTER-FREDERICK-CLARK FAITH IN ACTION: $98,000 · Human ServicesChildSafe Center - CAC: $39,531 · Human ServicesSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $182,560 · EducationLITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC: $10,000 · EducationWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$4,459,988Community Improvement$1,282,596Other$751,560Crime & Legal$295,000Human Services$249,532Education$192,560Housing & Shelter$175,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $2,395,085 over 7y, 19% of budgetOUR HEALTH INC: $1,282,596 over 8y, 46% of budgetNORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY SUBSTANCE USE COALITION: $575,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetST LUKE COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $447,403 over 8y, 19% of budgetSHENANDOAH COUNTY FREE CLINIC INC: $382,500 over 8y, 12% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $295,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetAIDS RESPONSE EFFORT INC D/B/A/ COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $200,000 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetSHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY: $182,560 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA UNITED INCORPORATED: $175,709 over 8y, 40% of budgetLORD FAIRFAX EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $164,000 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $125,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC: $124,400 over 8y, 17% of budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $112,001 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHAGERSTOWN GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWINCHESTER-FREDERICK-CLARK FAITH IN ACTION: $98,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetLAUREL RIDGE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCONCERN HOTLINE INC: $78,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetDENTAL CLINIC OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $65,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetNEW LIFE ALUMNI & FRIENDS INC: $63,391 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSHENANDOAH APPLE BLOSSOM FESTIVAL INCORPORATED: $48,500 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPAGE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $48,065 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetChildSafe Center - CAC: $39,531 over 2y, 12% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FRONT ROYAL: $27,195 over 1y, 24% of budgetMOUNTAINEER COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWheels for Wellness Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $14,300 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTOP OF VIRGINIA REGIONAL CHAMBER: $12,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS - WINCHESTER AREA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPAGE ONE OF PAGE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Norther…American Woodmark Fou…The Bank of Clarke Co…The Community Foundat…The Community Foundat…John L Harrell & Marg…The Brandt FoundationThe Woltz-Winchester …James L and Mary Jane…Adams Family Foundati…Virginia Association …Americares Foundation…
United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley IncVA45.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee · The Brandt Foundation · The Woltz-Winchester Foundation · James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust · Adams Family Foundation · Virginia Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Americares Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Valley Health System funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Valley Health System. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Hagerstown Goodwill Industries Inc: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Valley Health System’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home