· Private foundation
James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of JAMES L AND MARY JANE BOWMAN CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STONE HOUSE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| STEPHENS CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT | $5,000 |
| BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| DAKOTA'S DREAM ANIMAL RESCUE | $5,000 |
| WILDLIFE VETERINARY CARE | $2,948 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBELLE GROVE INC2× · 2020–2021 · $751k · revenue +74% · 49% of their budget
- BRBLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER3× · 2020–2022 · $258k · revenue +281%
- DDDAKOTA'S DREAM ANIMAL RESCUEINC2× · 2021–2022 · $80k · revenue +1% · 41% of their budget
Funded once
- HWHENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME FOR CHILDREN INCone grant, 2020 · $500k
- TLTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCEone grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -15%
- WRWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +242%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mount Vernon Animal Rescue Inc. is dedicated to advancing animal welfare through finding adopters and fosters for homeless animals, providing veterinarian care to animals in need, and assisting wildlife rehabilitators with injured and…
Provide lodging, rehabbing, training and socializing of unwanted animals
Save animals in a county with no animal services
We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Ridge Wildlife Center and the most unlike its peers is Stone House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BELLE GROVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA'S DREAM ANIMAL RESCUEINC ↗
- Who funds STONE HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NW WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds The Community Cat Alliance ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE VETERINARY CARE ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL ALLIES INC ↗
- Who funds WINCHESTER-FREDERICK-CLARK FAITH IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds THE GLASS-GLEN BURNIE MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · The Shoemaker Family Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 12 12 2012 · United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · Agt Hollis Family Foundation · The Clara Weiss Fund · Feltner Community Foundation · John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee · Andrew U Ferrari Foundation · Valley Health System · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to James L and Mary Jane Bowman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.