Loading…

HELENE P KAIGHIN CHARITABLE TR XXXXXXXXX

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

HELENE P KAIGHIN CHARITABLE TR XXXXXXXXX

This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.

$108k

Granted FY2024

12

Grants

1

Communities

$35k

Largest

01What you fundRead

03Your edgeRead

04Your fieldRead

05Through PlinthRead

01What you fund

01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of HELENE P KAIGHIN CHARITABLE TR XXXXXXXXX’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

mahoning valley

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k10 grants · $43k
$10k–50k2 grants · $65k

$5,000

Median grant

1

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$35,000
OAKWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION$30,000
TROOP 101 ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$6,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NEO$6,000
WARREN PHILHARMONIC$5,000
TRUMBULL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
COMMUNITY CONNECTION$5,000
TRUMBULL ART GALLERY$5,000
WARREN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION$4,000
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE$3,000
UPTON ASSOCIATION$3,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,000

02The need

04

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$553k · 20 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20

1

Total granted

$553k

$3k

Still filing today

35%

0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TA
TRUMBULL ART GALLERY
8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +7%
TC
TRUMBULL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
5× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +1297%
AW
ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE
8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +140%

Funded once

TN
TRUMBULL NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS - SWA
one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1

Trumbull Memorial Health Foundation

The purpose of the trumbull memorial health foundation is to carry out the charitable activities of the community foundation of the mahoning valley related to or in promotion of health care services or health care education in warren or…

Health

2

Trumbull Community Action Program

To study, plan, encourage, contract for and administer programs aimed at increasing opportunities for the victims of poverty. to provide human services and programs for the elimination of poverty and it's cause.

Human Services

3

Tri County Animal Protection League

Prevention of cruelty to animals, relieve suffering among animals, extend human education

—

4

Montoursville Public Library

Public library

—

5

Tuscarawas County Center for the Arts

Provide educational/cultural opportunities; encourage participation inappreciation of arts/cultural programs among residents oftuscarawas/surrounding counties; serve as focal point to design, operateand promote local arts and cultural…

Arts & Culture

6

Vicksburg-Warren County

The organization's purpose is archival and display of historical artifacts in a museum that is open to the public.

Arts & Culture

7

Trumbull Historical Society Inc

The trumbull historial society operates a small museum in the town of trumull, connecticut. its primary purpose is to reach, promote and preserve the history of trumbull.

—

8

The Harmon Museum

To preserve and present the history of warren county and southwest ohio.

Arts & Culture

9

Oakwood Cemetery Association

Provide non-profit cemetery

—

10

Tuscarawas Clinic for the

To provide medical and pharmaceutical care to the working uninsured residents of tuscarawas county, ohio. it will also provide health education, referrals and patient advocacy.

Health

11

Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services

12

Crawford County Humane Society

Humane care & treatment of animals

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trumbull County Historical Soc and the most unlike its peers is Animal Welfare League. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

1

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

4

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/9

Grantees still filing

5/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$473,500Arts & Culture$40,000Animals$14,000Education$12,500Philanthropy$8,000Human Services$7,500Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nancy Kaighin Van Fossan Family FoundationOH26.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nancy Kaighin Van Fossan Family Foundation · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Community Foundation of The · I J Van Huffel Foundation 460004013 · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation HELENE P KAIGHIN CHARITABLE TR XXXXXXXXX funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OAKWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 340434780 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OAKWOOD CEMETERY ASSOCIATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 16% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Helene P Kaighin Charitable Tr Xxxxxxxxx?

Find your warmest path to Helene P Kaighin Charitable Tr Xxxxxxxxx through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines