Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$619kPhilanthropy$180kHealth$117kArts & Culture$114kCommunity Improvement$80kReligion$55kYouth Development$51kEducation$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
YOUNGSTOWN BUSINESS INCUBATOR$25,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$20,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$10,000
POLAND FOREST FOUNDATION$7,500
GOODNESS GROWS$6,000
YOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP$6,000
AMERICAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$5,000
YWCA$5,000
WYSU$5,000
BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART$5,000
COLEMAN HEALTH SERVICES$5,000
FAIRHAVEN FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIVE WELL GO FISH: $2k → 13%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$969k · 25 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
35

Total granted

$969k
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

52%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $66k · revenue +159%
  • TY
    THE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR
    4× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +73%
  • CP
    COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • OS
    OBLATE SISTERS SACRED HEART OF JESUS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • SF
    SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $29k · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

2
Youngstown Area Goodwill Industries Inc

Youngstown area goodwill industries actively strives to achieve full participation in society of people with disabilities and special needs by expanding opportunities, capabilities, and independence.

3
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

4
Orrville United Way Inc

The orrville united way improves lives by unitiing people and resources to advance the common good in orrville, dalton and marshallville in eastern wayne county ohio. our goal is to create long-lasting changes that prevent future problems…

5
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
6
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
7
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
8
Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber of Commerce Foundation

To operate for charitable purposes that exclusively benefit or carry out the charitable, educational and/or economic development purposes of the youngstown/warren regional chamber.

Community Improvement
9
Mercy Memorial Hospital Association

Provides funds for medical equipment and other significant capital needs of mercy memorial hospital in urbana, ohio.

10
Economic Action Group Incorporated

To solidify and accelerate downtown youngstown's resurgence as a center of employment, higher education, government services & culture, and to serve as a catalyst for overall economic development in the mahoning valley.

Community Improvement
11
Youngstown Cityscape Inc

A community development organization dedicated to revitalization, beautification, education and historic preservation of the greater downtown youngstown area, its corridors and gateways.

Community Improvement
12
Marietta Health Foundation

The memorial health foundation encourages philanthropic support of marietta memorial hospital and related services. activities include raising funds, fund stewardship and making grants to improve health care in the mid-ohio valley.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbiana Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Melina Michelle Edenfield Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentSmall Business Development …Community Health CentersFaith-Based Senior LivingCancer Support OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringVeteran Support ServicesProfessional Ballet Compani…Community Arts OrganizationsEarly Childhood Education C…Classical Music Ensembles
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr18%24%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr15%17%35–55yr18%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%34%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr15%14%35–55yr18%35%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
15%
6,599/45,113

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $200,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE SALVATION ARMY — $200,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYUNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWN — $81,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF YOUNGSTOWNYWCA — $67,500 · OtherYWCAIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherOBLATE SISTERS SACRED HEART OF JESUS — $50,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $50,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $45,750 · Other+39 more — $248,960 · Other+39 moreMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $65,500 · Arts & CultureYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $16,000 · Arts & CultureBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART — $10,000 · Arts & CultureOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH — $7,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $6,500 · Arts & CultureCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $50,000 · HealthSHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION INC — $29,270 · HealthYELLOW BRICK PLACE — $14,500 · HealthYOUNGSTOWN COMMITTEE ON ALCOHOLISM INC — $6,000 · Health+2 more — $3,000 · HealthUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $80,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR — $60,000 · Community ImprovementOak Hill Collaborative Inc — $5,000 · Community ImprovementOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesLIVE WELL GO FISH — $2,000 · Human ServicesGOODNESS GROWS — $12,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$993,210Arts & Culture$105,500Health$102,770Philanthropy$82,000Community Improvement$65,000Human Services$17,000Food & Nutrition$12,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $65,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION INC — $29,270 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMERIDIAN HEALTHCARE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY — $16,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSISTER JEROME'S SCHOOLS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetYELLOW BRICK PLACE — $14,500 over 2y, 24% of budgetGOODNESS GROWS — $12,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH — $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN COMMITTEE ON ALCOHOLISM INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOak Hill Collaborative Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET WESTERN RESERVE — $3,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ENGLISH CENTER — $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHENRY H STAMBAUGH AUDITORIUM ASSOC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAIRHAVEN FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLUMBIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELINA MICHELLE EDENFIELD FOUNDATIO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE YOUNGSTOWN EDISON BUSINESS INCUBATOR
  • Who funds COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MERIDIAN HEALTHCARE
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY
  • Who funds SISTER JEROME'S SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds YELLOW BRICK PLACE
  • Who funds GOODNESS GROWS
  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART
  • Who funds OH WOW THE ROGER & GLORIA JONES CHILDREN'S CENTER FOR SCIENCE & TECH
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN COMMITTEE ON ALCOHOLISM INC
  • Who funds Oak Hill Collaborative Inc
  • Who funds American Junior Golf Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youngstown Fdn GeneralOH45.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · Frank & Pearl Gelbman Charitable Fdn · Premier Bank Foundation · Florence S Beecher Fdn · John D Finnegan Fdn · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · Fibushendricks Family Foundation · Senator Maurice & Florence Lipscher Char · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · John F & Loretta Hynes Fdn

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph