Skip to content
Val a Green & Edith D Green Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Val a Green & Edith D Green Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$684kArts & Culture$535kEducation$196kHealth$188kAnimals$66kYouth Development$24kCommunity Improvement$20kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $162k
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN A MORAN CENTER$87,000
DAVIS ARTS COUNCIL$75,000
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$5,000
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 10%PEACE HOUSE: $5k → 5%PEACE HOUSE: $5k → 5%UTAH PET PARTNERS: $5k → 8%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $5k → 8%UTAH FOSTER CARE: $4k → 8%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH: $3k → 8%HEART TO HEART ADOPTIONS: $5k → 8%CONTINUE MISSION: $5k → 6%UTAH CHINESE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 8%UTAH PET PARTNERS: $3k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES: $5k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $7k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $2k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $10k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $5k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $5k → 8%AMERICAN INDIAN SERVICES: $5k → 8%SUAZO BUSINESS CENTER: $5k → 8%SUAZO BUSINESS CENTER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 32 repeat orgs$317k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
48

Total granted

$1.5M
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+36%

Still filing today

75%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DAVIS ARTS COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $490k · revenue +23%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $285k · revenue +28%
  • US
    UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA
    5× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • ME
    MORAN EYE CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • TC
    The Center for Women and Children in Crisisgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +394%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
2
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
3
Utah Valley Family Support Center Inc

Provide services to victims and potential victims of child abuse and neglect.

—
4
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
5
Trauma-Informed Utah

The primary purpose of Trauma-Informed Utah is to respond to requests for education, resources and training around implementing a Trauma-Informed approach within their organization. The focus includes any and all sectors of society seeking…

Health
6
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
7
Shelter Providers of Utah

To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.

—
8
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
9
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
10
Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness

USARA's mission is to connect and inspire communities to advocate for addiction recovery. We envision a Utah where recovery community and connection are recognized as the most valuable assets for people to recover from addiction.

Health
11
Ability 1st Utah

Assisting persons with disabilities to develop independent living and social skills, assisting with housing and transportation needs, rights advocacy, and counseling.

Human Services
12
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Cross Ministries of Utah; the most unlike its peers is Drage Second Chance Ranch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/52
Grantees still filing
40/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHN A MORAN CENTER: $278,000 · OtherJOHN A MORAN CENTERUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHUNIVERSITY OF UTAH BUSINESS SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherFRIENDS FOR SIGHT: $28,000 · OtherMORAN EYE CENTER: $25,000 · Other+39 more: $230,882 · Other+39 moreDAVIS ARTS COUNCIL: $490,000 · Arts & CultureDAVIS ARTS COUNCILUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $285,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House C…The Rachel Covey Foundation: $24,000 · HealthThe Rachel Covey Founda…+10 more: $66,000 · Health+10 moreAmerican Indian Services: $25,000 · Human ServicesPeace House Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUAZO BUSINESS CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE INN BETWEEN: $8,407 · Human ServicesFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesUTAH PET PARTNERS: $7,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesUTAH CHINESE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEART TO HEART ADOPTION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCONTINUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesLOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesUTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $15,000 · AnimalsA NEW BEGINNING ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $10,000 · AnimalsDrage Second Chance Ranch: $8,000 · AnimalsNuzzles & Co: $5,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $5,000 · AnimalsWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $22,500 · EducationKids on the Move Inc: $10,000 · EducationUTAH VETERANS ALLIANCE: $17,500 · Public Benefit
Other$696,882Arts & Culture$525,000Health$375,000Human Services$107,407Animals$53,000Education$32,500Public Benefit$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAVIS ARTS COUNCIL: $490,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $285,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR SIGHT: $28,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Rachel Covey Foundation: $24,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH VETERANS ALLIANCE: $17,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $15,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $10,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STEP HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetA NEW BEGINNING ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEPICENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPeace House Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUAZO BUSINESS CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKids on the Move Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOperation Warm Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN: $8,407 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN UTAH INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetDrage Second Chance Ranch: $8,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUTAH PET PARTNERS: $7,500 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH CHINESE ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetHealthTree Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSummit Land Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNuzzles & Co: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLOURISH VENTURES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHoly Cross Ministries of Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetUTAH COUNCIL OF THE BLIND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHEART TO HEART ADOPTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONTINUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Salt Lake City Police Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetEYE CARE FOR KIDS - Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Alliance on Mental Illness Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWasatch Homeless Health Care: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIT TO RECOVER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFight Against Domestic Violence: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …Larry H Miller and Ga…Lawrence & Janet Dee …McCarthey Family Foun…Dominion Energy Chari…Ihc Health Services I…The Community Foundat…Pacificorp Foundation…Castle Foundation Co …Henry W & Leslie M Es…Intermountain Communi…
Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT73.7× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · The Community Foundation of Utah · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips · Henry W & Leslie M Eskuche Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Val a Green & Edith D Green Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Val a Green & Edith D Green Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Val a Green & Edith D Green’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home