· Private foundation
Uw Edward & Ellen Roche Rel Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMMA'S TORCH LTD | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| THE ALEX HOUSE PROJECT | $25,000 |
| PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC | $25,000 |
| GRAMEEN AMERICA INC | $25,000 |
| RAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC | $25,000 |
| PARAPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| NONTRADITIONAL EMPOLYMENT FOR WOMEN | $25,000 |
| QUALITAS OF LIFE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MAKE THE ROAD BY WALKING NY | $20,000 |
| YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $370k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ETEMMA'S TORCH LTD3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +15%
- PHPARAPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC3× · 2023–2025 · $75k · revenue +54%
- PTPURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- NWNEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +40%
- PNPROJECT NEW YORKER CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $21k · revenue 0%
- VIViolence Intervention Programone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Damayan empowers filipino migrant workers to fight for their labor, health,gender, and immigrant rights. the organization's purpose is to build workers' power to eliminate labor and human trafficking, fight wage theft and discrimination,…
Oic's mission is to provide training, basic skills, supportive counseling and job creation services to primarily low income persons regardless of race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, or national origin.
Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.
The organization is based in the south bronx and serves immigrants and communities of color by building, growing, and sustaining worker-owned green businesses to create a strong, local, and democratic economy rooted in racial and gender…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
To unite immigrants, members and allies so all new yorkers can thrive.
The hope program empowers new yorkers to build sustainable futures through training, jobs and career advancement.
The mission of pennsylvania women work is to empower women to advance in their careers and achieve self-sufficiency through life-changing career development programs and mentorship.
Our mission is to create opportunities for individuals impacted by the criminal legal system.
Leap empowers low and moderate income people by helping them gain access to living-wage employment opportunities and career paths. we seek to develop programs that counter prevailing market inequalities and contribute to a broader movement…
300,000 women of color entrepreneurs
Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Violence Intervention Program and the most unlike its peers is Nontraditional Employment for Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMMA'S TORCH LTD ↗
- Who funds PARAPROFESSIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds PURSUIT TRANSFORMATION COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Justice Network Inc ↗
- Who funds QUALITAS OF LIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD ↗
- Who funds POWHER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds MIGRATION RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW WOMEN NEW YORKERS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAMEEN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds RAY OF HOPE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds NONTRADITIONAL EMPLOYMENT FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Alex House Project Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT NEW YORKER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Violence Intervention Program ↗
- Who funds ACCOMPANY CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC ↗
- Who funds BIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Ira Decamp Foundation Xxxxx2009 · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Goodnation Foundation Inc · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Td Charitable Foundation · The Ford Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Uw Edward & Ellen Roche Rel Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.