Skip to content
Uva Culpeper Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Uva Culpeper Medical Center

Our mission transforming health and inspiring hope for all virginians and beyond.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.9MCommunity Improvement$81kHuman Services$56kYouth Development$26kEducation$26kFood & Nutrition$19kEmployment$9kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $79,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $113,494 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,144 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$8,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$206M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CULPEPER HUMAN SERVICES$25,000
ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH DBA CULPEPER FOOD CLOSET$12,500
CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION$10,000
CULPEPER SOCCER ASSOCIATION$8,500
FAUQUIER FISH$7,500
FRIENDS OF THE CULPEPER LIBRARY$5,500
SAFE (SERVICES FOR ABUSED FAMILIES)$5,300
AGING TOGETHER$5,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $8k → 6%HERO'S BRIDGE: $8k → 6%GIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $6k → 6%AGING TOGETHER CORPORATION: $6k → 8%AGING TOGETHER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 8 repeat orgs$339k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$235k
$300k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

88%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    Orange Free Clinic Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +52%
  • CC
    Culpeper County Chamber of Commerce
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +15%
  • PR
    PIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • UC
    UVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $224k · revenue +279% · 43% of their budget
  • RI
    RAPPU INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • GC
    GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue ×44
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Culpeper County Volunteer Fire Department Inc

To serve the community as a volunteer fire department.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Virginia Association of Health Plans

Provide Virginia health plans a voice in promoting quality and affordable healthcare through advocacy, communication, education, and research.

—
3
Fauquier Chamber of Commerce

We are focused on, and a resource for, the business, government and community interests of local businesses in and around fauquier county, virginia.

—
4
Culpeper Renaissance Inc

The purpose of culpeper renaissance is to enhance our community identity and heritage, to foster a center of activity and to help ensure economic growth and stability for downtown culpeper through concentrated efforts of design, promotion,…

Community Improvement
5
Free Clinic of Franklin County Inc

The free clinic of franklin county, inc is founded on the belief that everyone should have access to quality, affordable, primary health care regardless of their socio-economic or insurance status.

—
6
Southwest Virginia Community Health Systems Inc

Provide comprehensive primary medical care to the communites served.

Health
7
SeniorNavigatorcom

SeniorNavigator and its family of websites are national models for aging, disability and veteran information. By combining online assistance with a network of community-based centers, the websites bring over 26,000 community resources,…

Community Improvement
8
Fauquier Free Clinic Inc

The free clinic offers quality medical, dental and mental health care to residents of fauquier and rappahannock counties who lack appropriate alternatives for these services.

—
9
Free Clinic of the New River Valley Inc

The purpose of the Community Health Center of the New River Valley (CHCNRV) is to provide affordable and high quality medical, dental, behavioral, and preventive health care services to people of all ages and circumstances, regardless of…

—
10
GoochlandCares

GoochlandCares (GC) provides basic human services for local individuals who need help with healthcare, housing, food, clothing, and domestic violence services, providing a safety net for 2,135 Goochland residents and their families in 2024.

Health
11
Chesapeake Care Resources Inc

To provide quality services that enhance and improve life for individuals who have a developmental disability

Health
12
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Culpeper County Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $2,533,404 · HealthCULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC+5 more: $111,500 · HealthUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $224,377 · OtherUVA COMMUNITY…Culpeper County Chamber of Commerce: $49,531 · OtherCulpeper Coun…CULPEPER COUNTY: $41,500 · OtherCULPEPER COUN…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $46,700 · Other+6 moreHERO'S BRIDGE: $15,000 · Human ServicesAging Together Corporation: $10,550 · Human ServicesGIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $6,000 · Human ServicesRAPPU INC: $10,000 · EducationGERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE FRIENDS OF THE CULPEPER LIBRARY INC: $5,500 · EducationCulpeper Soccer Association: $8,500 · Recreation & SportsFAUQUIER FISH: $7,500 · PhilanthropyVIRGINIA REGIONAL TRANSIT: $7,000 · Community Improvement
Health$2,644,904Other$382,108Human Services$31,550Education$25,500Recreation & Sports$8,500Philanthropy$7,500Community Improvement$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCULPEPER WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $2,533,404 over 6y, 13% of budgetUVA COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $224,377 over 1y, 43% of budgetOrange Free Clinic Inc: $58,500 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetCulpeper County Chamber of Commerce: $49,531 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetPIEDMONT REGIONAL DENTAL CLINIC INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FAUQUIER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF FAUQUIER COUNTY INC: $19,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHERO'S BRIDGE: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAging Together Corporation: $10,550 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetRAPPU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $9,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCulpeper Soccer Association: $8,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPEOPLE INCORPORATED OF VIRGINIA: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRX DRUG ACCESS PARTNERSHIP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetVIRGINIA REGIONAL TRANSIT: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN PIEDMONT: $6,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetThe Arc of North Central Virginia Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE CULPEPER LIBRARY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetServices to Abused Families Inc: $5,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fauquier Health Found…Northern Piedmont Com…Culpeper Wellness Fou…Fhi ServicesThe Jesse and Rose Lo…Mightycause Charitabl…Dominion Energy Chari…Blue Ridge Community …William a Hazel Famil…American Woodmark Fou…Charlottesville Area …Fidelity Investments …
Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path FoundationVA44.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation · Northern Piedmont Community Foundation · Culpeper Wellness Foundation Inc · Fhi Services · The Jesse and Rose Loeb Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Blue Ridge Community Foundation · William a Hazel Family Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uva Culpeper Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uva Culpeper Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Uva Culpeper Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home