· Public charity
Utah Health Policy Project
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $252,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $263,018 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,018 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $96k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $156k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $90,180 |
| UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION | $66,031 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECT | $42,436 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC | $39,583 |
| COMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH | $13,770 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $677k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES7× · 2017–2024 · $639k · revenue +26%
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC6× · 2019–2024 · $342k · revenue +20%
- SLSALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM6× · 2019–2024 · $275k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- AFAssociation for Utah Community Healthone grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue +9%
- TQTHE QUEEN CENTERone grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue -69% · 37% of their budget
- AAASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Utah pacific islander health coalition's purpose is to improve quality of life for pacific islander and the communities they live in throughout the state of utah through health promoting efforts including public health education, prevent…
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
To empower Latino and Utah families by providing equitable access to information, resources, and educational programs to advance and strengthen the community.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.
The organization's purpose is focused on improving and advancing health care in utah to be more affordable, with better health outcomes by accelerating, enabling and promoting healthcare innovation.
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
To improve the health of all Utahns by advocating for and serving the professional needs of family physicians. The Academy strives to promote the family practice specialty by recruiting students. The Academy is engaged in educating and…
Provide medical, dental, and mental health care and pharmaceuticals to low-income families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Queen Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health Connect ↗
- Who funds SALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds COMUNIDAD MATERNA EN UTAH ↗
- Who funds Association for Utah Community Health ↗
- Who funds THE QUEEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
- Who funds UTAH'S PROMISE ↗
- Who funds Utah Children ↗
- Who funds Utah Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds Comunidades Unidas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Utah's Promise · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Express Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Making a Difference Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Utah Health Policy Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Utah Health Policy Project?
Find your warmest path to Utah Health Policy Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.