Skip to content
Utah Community Action Partnership Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Utah Community Action Partnership Association Inc

The organization's mission is to lead, strengthen, and support the community action network in order to build thriving communities and end poverty.

$563k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$178k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$354kFood & Nutrition$75kPhilanthropy$27k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $107k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $456k
$50,674
Median grant
1
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH DIAPER BANK$178,328
LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS$134,604
UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION$92,728
COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES FOOD BANK$50,674
OPEN DOORS$42,670
FIVE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF$33,199
SOUTHEASTERN UTAH ASSOCIATION OF$30,733
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $504k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TAX HELP UTAH: $20k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES FOOD BANK: $75k → 8%OGDEN WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION: $9k → 9%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS: $135k → 12%UTAH DIAPER BANK: $178k → 8%COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES FOOD BANK: $51k → 8%OGDEN WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION: $7k → 9%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS: $29k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$814k · 11 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$814k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+100%

Still filing today

55%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    Little Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $163k · revenue +56%
  • CA
    Community Action Services and Food Bank
    3× · 2023–2025 · $126k · revenue +27%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES
    4× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • TH
    TAX HELP UTAH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Community Action Partnership Association Inc

The organization's mission is to lead, strengthen, and support the community action network in order to build thriving communities and end poverty.

Human Services
2
Utah Neighborhood Connection

To Love & Empower our NeighborWe create a safe environment for community engagement where everyone is valued.We provide resources & equip our community for short and long term success.We encourage our local youth to express themselves…

Community Improvement
3
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
4
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
5
United Community Action Network

Creating solutions to poverty. improving lives in our community.

Human Services
6
Utah Association of Family Support Centers Inc

The mission of the fscu is to strengthen utah families one community at a time by supporting parents, protecting children, and preserving families. to accomplish this mission, each family support center provides its clients with a 24-hour…

—
7
Utah Domestic Violence Advisory Council

The organization's mission is to end domestic violence in utah through advocacy, education, collaboration, and leadership. the organization is the nationally recognized domestic violence coalition for the state of utah.

Crime & Legal
8
Salt Lake American

Serving refugees living in Salt Lake County who are unable to communicate in English and do not know how to navigate the system on-call 24-7 provided free a language interpreter and guidance through the system also help during weekday…

Religion
9
Tempe Community Action Agency Inc

TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…

Community Improvement
10
Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness

USARA's mission is to connect and inspire communities to advocate for addiction recovery. We envision a Utah where recovery community and connection are recognized as the most valuable assets for people to recover from addiction.

Health
11
Central Utah Food Sharing

Food bank - to assist those families who face the dilemma of paying rent or buying food.

—
12
Utahns Against Hunger

Our mission is to increase access to food across utah through advocacy, outreach, and education. utahns against hunger is utahs only state-wide anti-hunger non-profit organization working on public policy and advocacy for federal nutrition…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Services and Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Tax Help Utah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH DIAPER BANK: $178,328 · Human ServicesUTAH DIAPER BANKLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $163,214 · Human ServicesLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids IncCommunity Action Services and Food Bank: $125,750 · Human ServicesCommunity Action Services and Food BankTAX HELP UTAH INC: $20,236 · Human Services+1 more: $16,428 · Human ServicesSALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $155,746 · OtherSALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMFIVE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVT: $107,696 · OtherFIVE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVTSE Utah Assoc of Local Govts: $67,501 · OtherSE Utah Assoc of Local GovtsSix County Assoc of Govts: $30,775 · OtherSix County Assoc of GovtsUINTAH BASIN ASSOCIATION OF: $29,685 · OtherUINTAH BASIN ASSOCIATION OFUnited Way of Central and Southern Utah: $27,280 · OtherUnited Way of Central and Southern UtahBEAR RIVER ASSOCIATION OF GOVT: $15,501 · Other+1 more: $6,360 · OtherTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES: $74,811 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$503,956Other$440,544Crime & Legal$74,811

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUTAH DIAPER BANK: $178,328 over 1y, 36% of budgetLittle Lambs Foundation for Kids Inc: $163,214 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetSALT LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $155,746 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Action Services and Food Bank: $125,750 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FAMILY CONNECTION CENTER INC DBA OPEN DOORS SOCIAL SERVICES: $74,811 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUnited Way of Central and Southern Utah: $27,280 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOGDEN-WEBER COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $16,428 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $6,360 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Action Serv…Sorenson Legacy Found…Pacificorp Foundation…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Action Services and Food BankUT15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Action Services and Food Bank · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Utah Community Action Partnership Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Utah Community Action Partnership Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Utah Community Action Partnership Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home