Skip to content
Usaging at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Usaging

USAGING represents & supports the national network of area agencies on aging & advocates for the title vi native american aging programs that help older adults & people with disabilities live with optimal health, well-being, independence & dignity in their homes & communities.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
136
Grants FY2025still arriving
36
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$41MHealth$16MCivil Rights$5.0MRecreation & Sports$1.4MArts & Culture$1.4MHousing & Shelter$1.2MFood & Nutrition$856kEducation$659kOther$0
02FY2025 · 136 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k74 grants · $1.8M
  • $50k–250k48 grants · $6.8M
  • $250k+8 grants · $2.5M
$37,500
Median grant
36
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON WELLNESS NETWORK LLC$375,467
MIAMI UNIVERSITY (OHIO)$368,907
PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION$324,904
AGEOPTIONS INC$321,700
DIRECTIONS HOME AKRON CANTON AAAA$316,070
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$295,775
AGESPAN (MASS AGING ACCESS)$272,943
BETTER HEALTH TOGETHER$258,575
VERMONT AGING NETWORK CONSORTIUM (AGE WELL)$243,425
ADVANCING STATES$243,333
MID-AMERICAN REGIONAL COUNCIL$239,950
HEALTH PROMOTION COUNCIL OF SOUTHEASTERN PA$239,950
CHP COMMUNITY (IOWA COMMUNITY HUB)$239,950
TEXAS HEALTHY AT HOME$239,950
WESTERN NEW YORK INTEGRATED CARE COLLABORATIVE$239,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $19.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING (SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CARE PARTNERS): $239k → 15%THE LATINO HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM INC: $158k → 8%CNETER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OF NORTH CENTRAL PA: $150k → 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENCE OF THE DISABLED IN NY: $203k → 17%TEXAS HEALTHY AT HOME: $240k → 11%ABLE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $150k → 16%DOCSERVICES: $235k → 20%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO - PINELLAS: $224k → 12%LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY & TOMORROW: $627k → 11%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $594k → 12%REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $158k → 14%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY: $492k → 20%AGING & IN-HOME SERVICE OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $900k → 12%REAL SERVICES INC: $255k → 13%DIRECTIONS HOME AKRON CANTON AAAA: $316k → 13%WESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $750k → 17%PENINSULA AGENCY ON AGING: $138k → 17%VERMONT AGING NETWORK CONSORTIUM (AGE WELL): $243k → 10%SOUTHERN MAINE AGENCY ON AGING: $660k → 9%CENTRAL MAINE AREA AGENCY ON AGING (HEALTHY LIVING FOR ME): $313k → 12%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF REGION ONE: $144k → 11%PIMA COUNCIL ON AGING (SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY CARE PARTNERS): $167k → 15%LATINO HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM: $130k → 8%AGESPAN (MASS HOME CARE): $474k → 10%TEXAS HEALTHY AT HOME: $167k → 11%DOCSERVICES: $142k → 20%AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO - PINELLAS: $224k → 12%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $461k → 12%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY: $148k → 20%ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS INC: $135k → 22%AGING & IN-HOME SERVICE OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $169k → 12%REAL SERVICES INC: $204k → 13%DIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON AAAA: $174k → 13%ADVANCING STATES: $243k → 7%AGEWELL INC (VERMONT AGING NETWORK CONSORTIUM): $164k → 10%SOUTHERN MAINE AGENCY ON AGING: $248k → 9%HEALTHY LIVING FOR ME: $240k → 12%AGESPAN (MASS AGING ACCESS): $273k → 10%CONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $321k → 12%REAL SERVICES INC: $201k → 13%ADVANCING STATES: $225k → 7%SOUTHEASTERN WAKE ADULT DAY CENTER INC: $516k → 8%ADVANCING STATES: $147k → 7%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $442k → 8%AGEOPTIONS INC: $322k → 14%AGEOPTIONS: $269k → 14%AGEOPTIONS: $203k → 14%MOUNTING HORIZONS INC: $181k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72M · 196 repeat orgs$8.2M to everyone else

196 repeat relationships: 107 still active in FY2025, 89 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

196
60

Total granted

$72M
$7.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+14%

Still filing today

76%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $804k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +3% · 64% of their budget
  • CF
    COALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +38% · 50% of their budget
  • DR
    DISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • AM
    ASIAN MEDIA ACCESS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.4M
  • T
    TogetherAustin
    one grant, 2023 · $987k · revenue -55%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA
    one grant, 2023 · $969k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging

A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.

Human Services
2
Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging

Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.

Human Services
3
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
4
Area Agency On Aging for North Florida

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life for older adults, persons with disabilities, and caregivers through advocacy, education, and support. we want to ensure that older adults and adults with disabilities are valued and have the…

—
5
Northeast Kingdom Council on Aging Inc

We support people age 60 and older persons with disabilities in their efforts to remain active healthy, financially secure, and in control of their own lives. The Agency connects people and the services they they need to live independently…

Human Services
6
Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

—
7
Accessability Ctr for Independent Living

Accessability center for independent living, inc was organized to provide counseling, training, and advocacy services which assist people with disability to live and function independently.

—
8
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
9
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
10
Capital Area Agency On Aging Inc

The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.

Human Services
11
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
12
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil

Independent living services for persons with disabilities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Region Iv Area Agency On Aging Inc (With Foster Grandparents Program); the most unlike its peers is Pabneeg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

218 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 218 of the 285 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
214/218
Grantees still filing
134/218
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $4,566,023 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INCAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation: $1,383,000 · OtherASIAN MEDIA ACCESS: $1,350,000 · Other+95 more: $31,771,107 · Other+95 moreCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $1,457,560 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON …AGESPAN INC: $1,072,419 · Human ServicesAGESPAN INCAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $1,069,019 · Human ServicesAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES …Southern Maine Agency on Aging: $922,002 · Human ServicesWESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $858,033 · Human ServicesAGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING): $793,825 · Human ServicesSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC: $732,200 · Human ServicesLIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW INC: $696,540 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES INC: $660,720 · Human Services+53 more: $10,894,676 · Human Services+53 moreCOALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC: $2,098,414 · HealthCOALITION FOR…PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $1,010,953 · HealthPARTNERS IN C…Memorial Hermann Health System: $722,175 · HealthMemorial Herm…TIRR Foundation: $439,726 · HealthBETTER HEALTH TOGETHER: $426,050 · HealthHEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $408,468 · HealthWESTERN NEW YORK INTEGRATED CARE COLLABORATIVE INC: $407,425 · HealthCHPCOMMUNITY INC: $407,425 · HealthINCLUSIVE ALLIANCE IPA INC: $406,712 · HealthDESERT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $341,648 · HealthIBN SINA FOUNDATION INC: $338,080 · HealthValley Association for Independent Living: $325,000 · Health+10 more: $1,762,091 · Health+10 moreDISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,862,600 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS: $1,500,000 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA INC: $953,280 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA: $275,625 · Civil RightsPROGRESSIVE INDEPENDENCE INC: $200,039 · Civil RightsDISABILITY RIGHTS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $187,920 · Civil Rights+1 more: $95,400 · Civil RightsTogetherAustin: $987,390 · EducationRESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $569,734 · EducationGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $407,425 · EducationALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION INC: $135,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $75,959 · EducationVERMONT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $1,126,321 · Housing & ShelterFuture Choices Inc: $512,640 · Housing & ShelterDISABILITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $203,038 · Housing & ShelterVillage to Village Network Inc: $150,216 · Housing & ShelterUSA BOXING INC: $1,374,614 · Recreation & SportsSOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA AREAWIDE MODEL PROGRAM INC: $100,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$39,070,130Human Services$19,156,994Health$9,094,167Civil Rights$5,074,864Education$2,175,508Housing & Shelter$1,992,215Recreation & Sports$1,474,614

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $4,566,023 over 3y, 64% of budgetCOALITION FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING OPTIONS INC: $2,098,414 over 3y, 50% of budgetDISABILITY ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,862,600 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS TEXAS: $1,500,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $1,457,560 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetAmerican Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation: $1,383,000 over 2y, 61% of budgetUSA BOXING INC: $1,374,614 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetVERMONT CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $1,126,321 over 3y, 15% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS AGENCY ON AGING: $1,116,440 over 3y, 15% of budgetAGESPAN INC: $1,072,419 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $1,069,019 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetMAC INCORPORATED: $1,068,363 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $1,010,953 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSENIOR CONNECTIONS INC: $990,600 over 2y, 14% of budgetDISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA INC: $953,280 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetSouthern Maine Agency on Aging: $922,002 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetPSA 3 AGENCY ON AGING: $867,698 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $858,033 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING: $854,269 over 3y, 20% of budgetAGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING): $793,825 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC: $732,200 over 3y, 25% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NUTRITION & AGING SERVICES PROGRAMS: $726,439 over 3y, 51% of budgetNATIONAL GRANGE OF THE ORDER OF PATRONS OF HUSBANDRY: $725,200 over 3y, 21% of budgetMemorial Hermann Health System: $722,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO DISTRICT 5 AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $721,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR TODAY AND TOMORROW INC: $696,540 over 2y, 18% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $684,650 over 3y, 59% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $660,720 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING DISTRICT 7 INC: $655,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetADvancing States Inc: $615,208 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN WAKE ADULT DAY CENTER: $573,182 over 2y, 35% of budgetRESOURCES FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $569,734 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetSPECTRUM GENERATIONS: $552,825 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFuture Choices Inc: $512,640 over 2y, 39% of budgetENDEPENDENCE CENTER OF NORTHERN VA: $492,291 over 3y, 13% of budgetDIRECTION HOME AKRON CANTON AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $490,340 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission: $486,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY CENTERS ON DISABILITIES: $467,053 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $451,357 over 3y, 16% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PASCO-PINELLAS INC: $447,360 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTIRR Foundation: $439,726 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetBETTER HEALTH TOGETHER: $426,050 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $408,468 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetCOMAGINE HEALTH: $407,428 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHealth Promotion Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania Inc: $407,425 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $407,425 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN NEW YORK INTEGRATED CARE COLLABORATIVE INC: $407,425 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCHPCOMMUNITY INC: $407,425 over 2y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council on A…Meals on Wheels Ameri…AARP FoundationCwi Works IncNextfifty InitiativePublic Health Institu…Pharmaceutical Resear…AARPThe Scan FoundationCalifornia Foundation…American Association …The John a Hartford F…
National Council on Aging IncVA79.9× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council on Aging Inc · Meals on Wheels America · AARP Foundation · Cwi Works Inc · Nextfifty Initiative · Public Health Institute · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · AARP · The Scan Foundation · California Foundation for Independent Living Centers · American Association of People With Disabilities · The John a Hartford Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Usaging funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Usaging. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Disability Rights Oregon: 84% of income from government
  • Disability Rights Florida Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Agespan Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Agency On Aging of South Central Connecticut: 55% of income from government
  • Senior Connections Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Disability Resource Center Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Center for Independent Living of Nw Fl Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Association of University Centers On Disabilities: 34% of income from government
  • Vermont Center for Independent Living Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Resources for Independent Living Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Coalition for Independent Living Options Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Ride Connection Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Area Agency On Aging of Pasco-Pinellas Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
55report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 285 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Usaging’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home