Skip to content

· Public charity

USA Outreach

USA OUTREACH is a multifaceted educational organization serving students in four divisions.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
6
States reached
$252k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2023 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $550,888, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,143,665 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $592,777 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $252k
$18,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA$252,000
WISCONSIN INSTTUTE OF TORAH STUDY$100,000
MISC UNDER 5000$49,488
YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH$35,000
KOL TORAH$25,000
CONG AHAVAS YISROEL$18,500
JEWISH HERITAGE CENTER$18,000
YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH$10,700
TEXAS TORAH INSTITUTE$10,000
YESHIVA RAV ISACSOHN ACADEMY$9,200
BAYSWATER NEIGHBORS FUND$9,000
JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER$7,500
CHOFETZ CHAIM OF LOS ANGELES$6,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHOFETZ CHAIM OF LOS ANGELES: $7k → 14%KOL TORAH: $25k → 6%RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $252k → 13%TEXAS TORAH INSTITUTE: $10k → 5%YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH: $35k → 11%WISCONSIN INSTTUTE OF TORAH STUDY: $100k → 17%JEWISH EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $8k → 10%YESHIVA RAV ISACSOHN ACADEMY: $9k → 14%MISC UNDER 5000: $49k → 6%CONG AHAVAS YISROEL: $19k → 13%JEWISH HERITAGE CENTER: $18k → 13%YESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $11k → 13%BAYSWATER NEIGHBORS FUND: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $409k on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$409k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2023.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA: $252,000 · OtherRABBINICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICAWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR TORAH STUDY: $100,000 · OtherWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR TORAH STUDYMISC UNDER 5000: $49,488 · OtherMISC UNDER 5000YESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INC: $35,000 · OtherYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH OF BOCA RATON INCYESHIVA KOL TORAH OF THE FIVE TOWNS AND FAR ROCKAWAY INC: $25,000 · OtherCONG AHAVAS YISROEL: $18,500 · Other+7 more: $70,900 · Other+7 more
Other$550,888

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to USA Outreach?

Find your warmest path to USA Outreach through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on USA Outreach’s filings →

More from the funding graph