Skip to content
US Lacrosse Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

US Lacrosse Inc

Usa lacrosse is the governing body of men's and women's lacrosse in the united states.

$514k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$3.5MYouth Development$13kEducation$12kHuman Services$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $131,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $514,139 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $382,639 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
$8,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
(CONNY) CONNECTICUT NEW YORK YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION$30,000
NORTH JERSEY JUNIOR LACROSSE LEAGUE$20,000
NILOA - INTERCOLLEGIATE LACROSSE OFFICIALS ASSOC$20,000
JERSEY GIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION$10,000
INTERMOUNTAIN LACROSSE$10,000
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION$8,000
HUDSON VALLEY YOUTH LACROSSE LEAGUE$8,000
WASHINGTON SCHOOLGIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION$7,500
SOUTH JERSEY YOUTH LACROSSE LEAGUE$6,000
GREATER EASTSIDE LACROSSE LEAGUE$6,000
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA JUNIOR LACROSSE ASSOCIATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$674k · 16 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
92

Total granted

$674k
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+25%

Still filing today

44%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    COLLEGIATE WOMENS LACROSSE OFFICIATING ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $60k · revenue +103%
  • IL
    INTERMOUNTAIN LACROSSE UTAH INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $60k · revenue +100%
  • HL
    HOMEGROWN LACROSSE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $28k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • UL
    US LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2.3M · revenue -94% · 74% of their budget
  • YL
    YOUTH LACROSSE OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -24%
  • PA
    PHILADELPHIA AREA GIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nolensville High School Boys Lacrosse Club
—
2
Stratford High School Lacrosse

Youth Sports activities

Recreation & Sports
3
Caledonia Lacrosse Association

Girls and boys school lacrosse program

Recreation & Sports
4
Tualatin Lacrosse Club

Lacrosse Club for high school students

Youth Development
5
Clackamas Youth Lacrosse Inc

Clackamas youth lacrosse provides an opportunity for youth to learn and play the growing sport of lacrosse. girls and boys in grades 3 through 8 in the north clackamas school district attendance area are served by this organization.

—
6
Batavia Youth Lacrosse
Youth Development
7
Lincoln Youth Lacrosse Association

Development and competitive opportunities of youth in the game of lacrosse

Recreation & Sports
8
Lions Lacrosse Boosters

Provide lacrosse activities for youth

Recreation & Sports
9
Waukee Lacrosse
Recreation & Sports
10
Loveland Lacrosse Club

To promote the sport of lacrosse to loveland ohio area youth

Recreation & Sports
11
Liberty Lacrosse Club

The mission is to teach young athletes, through the game of lacrosse, a love of fitness and competition, a resilience of spirit in the face of challenge, and a belief in the principles of teamwork and sportmanship.

Recreation & Sports
12
Cg Trojan Lacrosse Inc

Provide lacrosse instruction and competition for youth ages 8-18.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homegrown Lacrosse; the most unlike its peers is Bryant Arkansas Lacrosse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/50
Grantees still filing
33/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

US LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC: $2,299,583 · Recreation & SportsUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC+19 more: $422,704 · Recreation & Sports+19 moreNORTH JERSEY JUNIOR LACROSSE LEAGUE: $71,500 · OtherNORTH JERSEY JUNIOR L…(CONNY) CONNECTICUT NEW YORK YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Other(CONNY) CONNECTICUT N…US LACROSSE INC: $67,098 · OtherUS LACROSSE INCSOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $28,398 · Other+67 more: $435,996 · Other+67 moreClairemont High School Foundation Inc: $6,522 · EducationLINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $6,166 · EducationDISCOVERY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $5,421 · EducationTIOSPA ZINA TRIBAL SCHOOL: $5,411 · EducationMIRA MESA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,336 · EducationFOX CREEK SCHOOL INC: $5,262 · EducationEAST MUSKINGUM UMBRELLA BOOSTERS: $5,256 · EducationDenmark Boys Lacrosse Booster Club Inc: $5,229 · EducationRICHMOND FRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $5,228 · EducationLYNDON INSTITUTE INC: $5,184 · EducationUrban Prep Academies: $5,163 · EducationWASHINGTON SCHOOLGIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $18,750 · PhilanthropyTOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 211 FOUNDATION: $5,260 · PhilanthropyNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentNassau County Police Activity League Inc: $5,250 · Youth DevelopmentWashington Township Youth Association: $5,089 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF CARROLL RECREATION AND PARKS: $5,126 · Community ImprovementOakland Lacrosse Club: $5,063 · Human Services
Recreation & Sports$2,722,287Other$672,992Education$60,178Philanthropy$24,010Youth Development$17,839Community Improvement$5,126Human Services$5,063

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC: $2,299,583 over 1y, 74% of budgetNORTHERN CA JUNIOR LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $85,196 over 6y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL INTERCOLLEGIATE LACROSSE O FFICIALS ASSN I: $80,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetCOLLEGIATE WOMENS LACROSSE OFFICIATING ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN LACROSSE UTAH INC: $59,907 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetJERSEY GIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetHOMEGROWN LACROSSE: $28,049 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMASS BAY GIRLS LACROSSE LEAGUE: $21,277 over 2y, 26% of budgetWASHINGTON SCHOOLGIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION: $18,750 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetYOUTH LACROSSE OF MINNESOTA: $13,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $6,450 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLINCOLN UNIVERSITY: $6,166 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJETS OF HARLEM INC: $6,004 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLITTLE ROCK LACROSSE INC: $6,004 over 1y, 18% of budgetDISCOVERY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $5,421 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIOSPA ZINA TRIBAL SCHOOL: $5,411 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWest Bay Lacrosse League: $5,403 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE NEW SCHOOL INC: $5,377 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRA MESA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $5,336 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetFOX CREEK SCHOOL INC: $5,262 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 211 FOUNDATION: $5,260 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetMANNING EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION: $5,259 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST MUSKINGUM UMBRELLA BOOSTERS: $5,256 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNassau County Police Activity League Inc: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCDS AZTEC LACROSSE CLUB: $5,245 over 1y, 10% of budgetRICHMOND FRIENDS SCHOOL INC: $5,228 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLYNDON INSTITUTE INC: $5,184 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Prep Academies: $5,163 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWashington Township Youth Association: $5,089 over 1y, 10% of budgetOakland Lacrosse Club: $5,063 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNANTUCKET STUDENT LACROSSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetWASHINGTON INNER CITY LACROSSE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds US LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN CA JUNIOR LACROSSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INTERCOLLEGIATE LACROSSE O FFICIALS ASSN I ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE WOMENS LACROSSE OFFICIATING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN LACROSSE UTAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY GIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMEGROWN LACROSSE ↗
  • Who funds MASS BAY GIRLS LACROSSE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON SCHOOLGIRLS LACROSSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO YOUTH LACROSSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH LACROSSE OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Clairemont High School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds FRASER VALLEY LACROSSE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Project Lead the Way …GenYOUTH IncorporatedGood Sports IncI Car Education Found…Dick's Sporting Goods…Share Our StrengthRound It Up America I…Bill Belichick Founda…Project Lead the Way …For Inspiration and R…The Mr Holland's Opus…Feed the Children Inc
Project Lead the Way IncIN24× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Project Lead the Way Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Good Sports Inc · I Car Education Foundation · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Share Our Strength · Round It Up America Inc · Bill Belichick Foundation Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Feed the Children Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization US Lacrosse Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from US Lacrosse Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Lyndon Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on US Lacrosse’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home