How much did US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

asiansalvation armyshelter victimsrefugee youthcovenantstaffassisting

2020

brandeiscovenantdrop-innowstaffprevention aftercarelearning

2021

catholic servesserves transformativetransformative empoweringempowering dignity-affirmingdignity-affirming socialsocial guidedguided catholic

2022

christian mainmain officebrandeisgroupsgenerationartssciences

2023

afghanprofessionalsaspirationsnewcomers foodclothing housinggoodcampus

2024

hpeslimitedpoordisabledlong-termselfsufficiency

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 160 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k13 grants · $98k
$10k–50k34 grants · $842k
$50k–250k35 grants · $4.0M
$250k+78 grants · $270M

$225,971

Median grant

States reached

$134M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIFIED ADMINISTRATORS LLC$87,374,687
YMCA INTERNATIONAL SERVICES$19,297,684
ICF INCORPORATED LLC$15,166,377
HARRIS COUNTY$7,459,209
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ST LOUIS$7,421,974
YOUTH CO-OP INC$7,175,735
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND$6,736,472
NATIONALITIES SERVICES CENTER- PHILLADELPHIA$6,019,772
CHILDREN'S BUREAU (ALL FOR KIDS)$6,011,702
JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$5,161,869
INTERFAITH-RISE$4,665,880
MARY'S CENTER FOR MATERNAL AND CHILDCARE INC$4,199,212
THE REFORMED CHURCH OF HIGHLAND PARK AHC$4,180,433
CAMBA INC$3,760,133
HEARTLAND ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN NEEDS AND HR- CHICAGO$3,662,270

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $230.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$872M · 158 repeat orgs$7.5M to everyone else

158 repeat relationships — 114 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158

Total granted

$872M

$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%

+128%

Still filing today

75%

70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalInternationalCivil RightsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YO
YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON
7× · 2018–2024 · $51M · revenue +25%
II
Internationals Institute Of New HampshireManchest
7× · 2018–2024 · $24M · revenue +529% · 30% of their budget
YC
Youth Co-Op Palm Springs
7× · 2018–2024 · $24M · revenue +67%

Funded once

RH
RAMBO HOUSE MEDIA LLC
one grant, 2023 · $971k
YO
YWCA of North Central Indiana
one grant, 2020 · $624k · revenue +10%
TC
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
one grant, 2022 · $483k · revenue -43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service

Lirs works to create welcome for migrants and refugees. advocates for and helps (cont'd on sch o)

—

Organization for Refugee and

Refugee Services providing government assistance services,employment services, health services, conflict resolution and legal services.

Human Services

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St. Cloud is a nonprofit human services organization that in 2024 served 47,220 individuals of all faiths and beliefs across Central Minnesota.

Human Services

Advocates for Immigrant Survivors

AIS's mission is to provide immigration legal services and social services to aid survivors in accessing the rights to justice, dignity, and restoration. AIS's main programs are our Immigration Legal Services Program, our Case Management…

Human Services

Immigration Institute of the Bay Area

The immigration institute of the bay area helps immigrants, refugees, and their families join and contribute to the community.

Arts & Culture

Illinois Community for Displaced

Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.

Human Services

AsylumWorks

AsylumWorks provides tailored services to educate, equip, and empower newcomers seeking safety to overcome health, legal, and employment barriers.

International

Jubilee Immigration Advocates

Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…

Human Services

Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights

Crisis Intervention & Advocacy Center

To respond to and advocate for victims/survivors of domestic abuse, sexual assualt, dating violence, stalking & homelessness.

Human Services

International Community Health Services

Provide health services to improve the health of asian pacific islander and other communities.

Health

Refugeeone

Refugeeone creates opportunity for refugees fleeing war, terror, and persecution to build new lives of safety, dignity, and self-reliance

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refugee & Immigrant Center for and the most unlike its peers is Brandeis University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1.0%2/209

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,819,356

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

162 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

157/162

Grantees still filing

143/162

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$544,690,037Human Services$233,519,555Civil Rights$35,733,954Employment$23,822,154Crime & Legal$19,569,739International$15,225,261Health$7,319,894

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lutheran Immigration & Refugee ServiceMD45.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service · International Rescue Committee Inc · Gofundmeorg · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · Vera Institute of Justice Inc · Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Shapiro Foundation · National Foundation for the Centers For · Church World Service Inc · The Community Foundation for Northern

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANSAR OF PITTSBURGH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +59% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814052305 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ANSAR OF PITTSBURGH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to US Committee for Refugees And?

Find your warmest path to US Committee for Refugees And through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

162 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to US Committee for Refugees And?

More from the funding graph

US COMMITTEE FOR REFUGEES AND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

162 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to US Committee for Refugees And?

More from the funding graph