Loading…
· Public charity
URBAN REVIVAL INC
Ethnic/racial harmony through affordable housing & economic development.
$386k
Granted FY2024
3
Grants
3
Communities
$237k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Community Improvement$459kCivil Rights$241kPhilanthropy$237kHuman Services$70kHealth$33kOther$154k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
—
2020
tenant organizing
2022
ishi rentersrenters risingjustice
2023
fullcolorracismachieveadvocate legislationjusticeenvironmental
2024
justiceorganizingrights
2025
healthchangeorganizing
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 3 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $350k
$113,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
- TIDES FOUNDATION$236,699
- RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE INC$113,500
- BROCKTON WORKER ALLIANCE$30,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 13%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$334k · 4 repeat orgs$860k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
7
Total granted
$334k
$593k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+501%
+1062%
Still filing today
100%
57%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE INC4× · 2020–2024 · $199k · revenue +501%- AFALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY & ENVIRO3× · 2020–2023 · $63k · revenue +754%
- CPCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +50%
Funded once
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $397k · revenue +1590%- RTRIGHT TO THE CITY BOSTONone grant, 2022 · $70k
- SNSPRINGFIELD NO ONE LEAVESone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
2
Aapi Equity Alliance
Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…
Human Services
3
Chinese Progressive Association
Services and advocacy for members of the chinese american community
—
4
Asian AmericansPacific Islanders in
AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.
Philanthropy
5
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
Civil Rights
6
Communities Resist Inc
Core is a communnity-based law office that partners with communities of color in brooklyn and queens to combat predatory capitalism, gentrification and structural racism.
Housing & Shelter
7
Asian Americans Advancing Justice -
The mission of AAAJ-ALC is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United…
Crime & Legal
8
Mass Alliance Inc
Mass alliance is a coalition for political and advocacy organizations that work together to build a progressive massachusetts. our member organizations have a diverse range of prorities, including: civic participation, civil rights,…
Civil Rights
9
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance
—
10
Chinese for Affirmative Action
Chinese for Affirmative Action ("CAA") is a community-based civil rights organization that conducts community service, policy advocacy, and movement building activities.
Civil Rights
11
Asian American Legal Defense and
A national organization that protects & promotes the civil rights of asian americans.
—
12
Asian Americans Advancing Justice
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Labor United Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tides Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$459,219Civil Rights$241,000Philanthropy$236,699Other$154,000Human Services$70,000Health$32,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY & ENVIRO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LABOR UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON WORKER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RESIST INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP IN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Hyams Foundation IncMA16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Hyams Foundation Inc · Resist Inc · Third Sector New England Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center · Haymarket People's Fund Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation URBAN REVIVAL INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
- Community Labor United Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~22 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 16.9× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 473589804 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 22 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Urban Revival Inc?
Find your warmest path to Urban Revival Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines