· Public charity
Upper Arlington Rotary Charitable Foundation C/O Andrew Livingston
To encourage and foster the service ideal of service above self.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $112,167 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $133,892 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,725 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $29k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATUN GUATEMALA | $65,000 |
| UPPER ARLINGTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRIC | $16,667 |
| BONSFORGOOD CHARITIES INC | $12,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF | $6,000 |
| UPPER ARLINGTON LUTHERAN CHURCH | $6,000 |
| SANTA'S SILENT HELPERS OF COLUMBUS | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBONZY CHARITIES INC4× · 2022–2025 · $43k · revenue +314%
- THTHE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +27%
- YWYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION2× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- WWCBEone grant, 2021 · $27k
- HYHighland Youth Garden Incone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -18%
- CCCENTRAL CITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
We, in partnership with our community, provide a comfortable and caring home away from home that supports keeping families together and reduces stress during a child's serious illness.
We are a grassroots driven and governed organization that advocates and educates on behalf of the YMCAs and its mission, upholding the four core YMCA values of caring, honestly, respect, and responsibility. The Alliance also fosters…
Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
At united way of north central ohio, we bring people, organizations, and resources together to create solutions that improve the lives of every person in every community in our region.
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
To accelerate the mission of Upward Unlimited by creating fundraising opportunities for individuals, institutions, and other non-profits to invest in the Upward Unlimited mission thereby overcoming risks and challenges due to lack of…
Helping all ohioans to reach their fullest health potential.
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
FutureHeights seeks to inspire and facilitate collaboration and empowerment across our communities to ensure a vibrant and sustainable future for Cleveland Heights and University Heights.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The 2ND and 7 Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bonzy Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATUN GUATEMALA ↗
- Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BONZY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Santas Silent Helpers of Columbus Inc ↗
- Who funds Highland Youth Garden Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds THE 2ND AND 7 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUDDY UP FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds The Bridge Corp ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Ohio Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO ↗
- Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Safelite Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · The William H Davis Dorothy M Davis and William C Davis Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · M I Homes Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Upper Arlington Rotary Charitable Foundation C/O Andrew Livingston funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Upper Arlington Rotary Charitable Foundation C/O Andrew Livingston?
Find your warmest path to Upper Arlington Rotary Charitable Foundation C/O Andrew Livingston through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.