Skip to content
Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc

Unsung siblings foundation, inc.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$95kAnimals$80kEducation$31kPublic Benefit$25kCivil Rights$20kEmployment$18kPhilanthropy$9kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $77,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $150,045 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$20,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NICHOLAS CENTER LTD$30,000
WE CARE$20,300
PAWS OF WAR$20,000
CLARK GILLIES FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMPLO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%CLARK GILLIES FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%CLARK GILLIES FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$174k · 10 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
22

Total granted

$174k
$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’24
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PAWS OF WAR INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +449%
  • NC
    NICHOLAS CENTER LTD
    2× · 2022–2024 · $39k · revenue +33%
  • SD
    SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +504%

Funded once

  • WA
    WITH ARMS WIDE OPEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -37%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • AS
    AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA NASSAU-SU
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
End Autism Now Foundation
Education
2
Angels With Autism Foundation

To support autism awareness and research

Philanthropy
3
George a Butchikas Foundation for Autism
Philanthropy
4
Hosemann Family Autism Foundation
Education
5
Finding Autistic Solutions for Tomorrow

Assistance to families effected by autis

Health
6
Gastrointestinal Autism Research Foundation Inc

The activities of this foundation will be directed towards researching the bowel inflammatory disease thatappears unique to children with autism. research will take the form of laboratory analysis of specimens,review of patient historical…

Philanthropy
7
Clinical Research Associates Llc
—
8
The Jarred Bryan Sparks Foundation

Promote awareness and assist individuals diagnosed with autism

Human Services
9
Red Autismo Foundation
Health
10
N of One

N of One aims to create breakthroughs in autism by focusing on emerging areas such as the microbiome, immune system, and mitochondrial cell metabolism. We take a venture capital appproach by supporting both innovative academic researchers…

Health
11
Xel Foundation

The organization is formed exclusively to provide research and provide financial support to 501(c)(3) organizations for selected projects which involve one or more of the following objectives: (continued on schedule o)

Health
12
Dysimmune Diseases Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Next for Autism Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clark Gillies Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WE CARE: $20,300 · OtherWE CAREST FRANCIS PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $19,786 · OtherST FRANCIS PREPARATORY SCHOOLAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA NASSAU-SU: $15,000 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA NASSAU-SUST FRANCIS PREP HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST FRANCIS PREP HIGH SCHOOLCIC FOUNDATION: $6,800 · OtherCIC FOUNDATION+15 more: $23,160 · Other+15 morePAWS OF WAR INC: $80,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF WAR INCNICHOLAS CENTER LTD: $38,700 · PhilanthropyNICHOLAS CENTER …Michael W McCarthy Foundation Inc: $1,800 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyWITH ARMS WIDE OPEN INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitWITH ARMS…CLARK GILLIES FOUNDATION: $14,300 · Human ServicesAMPLO FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD: $18,100 · EmploymentDesi Strong Foundation: $6,000 · HealthPOP EARTH CORPORATION: $3,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,200 · HealthNEXT FOR AUTISM INC: $1,127 · Health+1 more: $200 · Health
Other$95,046Animals$80,000Philanthropy$41,500Public Benefit$25,000Human Services$20,800Employment$18,100Health$11,527

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $80,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetNICHOLAS CENTER LTD: $38,700 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWITH ARMS WIDE OPEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD: $18,100 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA NASSAU-SU: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCLARK GILLIES FOUNDATION: $14,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDesi Strong Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPOP EARTH CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTROOPERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,860 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSOAR FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMichael W McCarthy Foundation Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark Gillies Foundat…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Clark Gillies FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark Gillies Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Unsung Siblings’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home