Skip to content
University of Minnesota Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

University of Minnesota Foundation

A non-profit organization with the sole purpose of supporting the university of minnesota with a mission to connect passion with possibility, inspire generosity, and support greatness at the university of minnesota.

$304M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$295M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.1BHealth$28MEnvironment$6.7MPhilanthropy$2.7MEmployment$1.0MHuman Services$351kFood & Nutrition$203kArts & Culture$94kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $361k
  • $250k+7 grants · $304M
$353,576
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$294,797,625
FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES$5,554,400
UNIVERSITY GATEWAY CORPORATION$1,300,000
BETA OF CLOVIA FOUNDATION$806,253
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$547,033
MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION$353,576
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$262,500
THE FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC$203,266
EQUITY IN ACTION WAY FOUNDATION$93,880
BOWEN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY$64,257
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANS$6,283
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $351k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOWEN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY: $64k → 14%BOWEN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY: $62k → 14%BOWEN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY: $61k → 14%Bowen Center for the Study of the Family: $56k → 14%BOWEN CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE FAMILY: $55k → 14%Georgetown Family Center Bowen Center for the Study of the Family: $52k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1B · 11 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$2.1B
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+1%

Still filing today

91%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    Fairview Health Services
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26M · revenue +29%
  • ML
    MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.7M · revenue +273%
  • UG
    UNIVERSITY GATEWAY CORPORATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $6.4M · revenue +25% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • MS
    MINNEAPOLIS SAINT PAUL REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +65%
  • LL
    LUPUS LINK MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD & NECK SURGERY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healtheast Woodwinds Hospital

Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.

Health
2
Healtheast St John's Hospital

Fairview is driven to heal, discover, and educate for longer, healthier lives.

Health
3
Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital

Provide quality, accessible, and valuable health care services via a hospital, home health agency, and clinic to the surrounding rural community.

Health
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
5
Range Regional Health Services

Range Regional Health Services is an integrated health care system meeting the needs of our patients in an exemplary manner.

Health
6
Mayo Clinic Group Return

To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every patient through integrated clinical practice, education, and research.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
8
Minnesota Colon and Rectal Foundation
Health
9
University of Minnesota Foundation

A non-profit organization with the sole purpose of supporting the university of minnesota with a mission to connect passion with possibility, inspire generosity, and support greatness at the university of minnesota.

Education
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
University of Winnipeg Foundation Usa Inc
Education
12
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Carol E Macpherson Memorial Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2,048,354,177 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA+9 more: $1,745,005 · OtherFairview Health Services: $25,646,619 · Health+5 more: $1,956,803 · HealthMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $6,739,326 · EnvironmentUNIVERSITY GATEWAY CORPORATION: $6,400,000 · EducationTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $1,937,796 · PhilanthropyBETA CHAPTER OF CLOVIA FOUNDATION: $806,253 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $132,592 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN FAMILY CENTER: $351,249 · Human ServicesFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $203,266 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,050,099,182Health$27,603,422Environment$6,739,326Education$6,400,000Philanthropy$2,876,641Human Services$351,249Food & Nutrition$203,266

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairview Health Services: $25,646,619 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARBORETUM FOUNDATION: $6,739,326 over 9y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY GATEWAY CORPORATION: $6,400,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetTHE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION: $1,937,796 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBETA CHAPTER OF CLOVIA FOUNDATION: $806,253 over 1y, 80% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PHYSICIANS: $618,509 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $553,687 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhode Island Hospital Foundation: $547,033 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $485,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetGEORGETOWN FAMILY CENTER: $351,249 over 6y, 15% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $203,266 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $132,592 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetStarkey Hearing Foundation: $120,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFairview Foundation: $117,574 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetEQUITY IN ACTION WAY FOUNDATION: $93,880 over 1y, 12% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SAINT PAUL REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP: $49,503 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY HEAD & NECK SURGERY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCarol E Macpherson Memorial Scholarship Fund Inc: $19,122 over 1y, 42% of budgetJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS UNIVERSITY ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization University of Minnesota Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from University of Minnesota Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on University of Minnesota’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home