Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Working Families

To advance the interests of the working class, middle class and poor americans, through legislative advocacy, public education, creative media and community organizing.

$74k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Civil Rights$157kEmployment$144kCommunity Improvement$33kPublic Benefit$32kReligion$24k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $43,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $74,195 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,195 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$531k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRASSROOTS ILLINOIS ACTION$13,000
THE PEOPLES LOBBY$7,500
JCUA VOTES$7,500
WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE$7,500
ONE PEOPLES CAMPAIGN$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION: $67k → 20%GRASSROOTS ILLINOIS ACTION: $44k → 14%WFP NATIONAL PAC: $50k → 20%GRASSROOTS ILLINOIS ACTION: $13k → 14%ONE PEOPLES CAMPAIGN: $8k → 14%COOK COUNTY COLLEGE TEACHERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION: $24k → 14%JCUA VOTES: $8k → 14%THE PEOPLES LOBBY: $8k → 14%WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE: $8k → 14%SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION: $25k → 14%WAREHOUSE WORKERS FOR JUSTICE: $44k → 14%CHICAGO WORKERS CCOLLABORATIVE: $44k → 14%FRIENDS OF ALMA ANAYA: $24k → 14%BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Working Family Solidarity

Working Family Solidarity builds unity between low and moderate-income families of different backgrounds, especially African American and Latino, to struggle together for equitable development. We fight for racial equity and economic…

Employment
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
4
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
5
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
6
Chicago Jobs With Justice

The mission of Chicago Jobs with Justice is to build a strong and progressive labor movement that works in coalition with student, faith and community organizations to win important campaigns for workers' rights and social and economic…

Civil Rights
7
Interfaith Worker Justice

To advance the rights of workers by engaging diverse faith communities into action, from grassroots organizing to shaping policy at the local, state and national levels. They envision a nation where all workers enjoy the rights to:…

Religion
8
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
9
Chicago Jobs Council

Chicago Jobs Council (CJC) pursues its mission through advocacy, applied research, public education and capacity-building initiatives focused on influencing the development or reform of public policies and programs. From 18 original…

10
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
11
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

12
Illinios Workers in Action

Illinois Workers in Action IWA mission is to empower workers through education organizing policy solidarity worker power develop leadership in the workplace and offer resources to families and the community.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Workers' Collaborative Nfp and the most unlike its peers is Brighton Park Neighborhood Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORKING FAMILIES PARTY NATIONAL PAC — $50,000 · OtherWORKING FAMILIES PARTY NATIONAL …FRIENDS OF ALMA ANAYA — $24,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ALMA ANAYACOOK COUNTY COLLEGE TEACHERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION — $24,000 · OtherCOOK COUNTY COLLEGE TEACHERS UNI…ONE PEOPLES PROJECT — $7,500 · OtherONE PEOPLES PROJECTTHE PEOPLE'S LOBBY — $7,500 · OtherTHE PEOPLE'S LOBBYWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $67,000 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMILIES ORGA…Workers Center For Racial Just NFP — $7,500 · Civil RightsWorkers Center For Ra…Grassroots Illinois Action — $56,750 · EmploymentGrassroots Illin…Chicago Workers' Collaborative NFP — $43,750 · EducationChicago Work…Warehouse Workers Justice Center Inc — $43,750 · Crime & LegalWarehouse Wo…BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $25,000 · Community ImprovementBRIGHTON …Jewish Council on Urban Affairs — $7,500 · Community ImprovementJewish Co…SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$113,000Civil Rights$74,500Employment$56,750Education$43,750Crime & Legal$43,750Community Improvement$32,500Philanthropy$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $67,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGrassroots Illinois Action — $56,750 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetChicago Workers' Collaborative NFP — $43,750 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWarehouse Workers Justice Center Inc — $43,750 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PEOPLE'S LOBBY — $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Field Foundation of IllinoisIL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Field Foundation of Illinois · Woods Fund of Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Solidago Foundation · Forefront · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Working Families funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Working Families?

    Find your warmest path to United Working Families through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph