· Public charity
United Way of Yavapai County Inc
Unite people, organizations and resources to improve lives and build strong communities throughout yavapai county.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $42,125 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $140,953 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $98,828 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAGDAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $17,125 |
| PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD | $10,000 |
| EMBRY RIDDLE VETERANS HOUSING ASSIS | $8,750 |
| MANZANITA OUTREACH | $6,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOManzanita Outreach5× · 2019–2024 · $126k · revenue ×44
- OTOld Town Mission Inc3× · 2020–2023 · $101k · revenue +73%
- PAPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc4× · 2017–2023 · $78k · revenue +161%
Funded once
- NCNORTHLAND CARESone grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -57%
- CVCamp Verde Unified School Disone grant, 2020 · $35k
- VVVERDE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCone grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
AZCEND nourishes minds and bodies so that neighbors in need experience a brighter future.
Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…
Our mission is to love, house, and equip men, women and children. coming from chronic unemployment, recovery, or an endless cycle of homelessness, our residents experience a clean, safe home where transforming their life can begin.…
A resource and day-center for seniors, age 55+, providing guidance and support on the PATH back to housing; and CARE supportive services to prevent a return to homelessness.
To halt hunger and malnutrition in Yavapai County and provide relief from suffering for those who are living in poverty by giving a hand up, not just a hand out.
Enable families on the precipice of homelessness, or currently experiencing homelessness, to sustain or gain employment, independent housing and self-sufficiency.
TCAA's mission is to eliminate poverty and advance equitable communities. This mission is achieved through the delivery of comprehensive human services programs designed to improve housing stability, increase food security, improve health…
To improve the quality of life of families and individuals who are homeless or at risk of homelessness in cochise county, arizona.
Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.
To provide hope and care to hurting children and families through christ centered ministries
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agape House of Prescott Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bagdad Core Committee. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Manzanita Outreach ↗
- Who funds Old Town Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE WHO CARE ↗
- Who funds AGAPE HOUSE OF PRESCOTT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds NORTHLAND CARES ↗
- Who funds The Launch Pad Teen Center ↗
- Who funds YAVAPAI BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds VERDE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds VERDE VALLEY IMAGINATION LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC DBA PRESCOTT AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES ↗
- Who funds H10 Ministries ↗
- Who funds HOME FOR NEW BEGINNINGS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT FARMERS MARKET INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA FOOD BANK NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSION & JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Margaret T Morris Foundation · One Az Community Foundation Inc · Yavapai Community Hospital Association Dba Yavapai Regional Medical Center · Jw Kieckhefer Foundation · Del E Webb Foundation · Perry and Sandy Massie Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Yavapai County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.