Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Whiteside County

Providing dynamic leadership in uniting people and resources to create lasting change that improves lives and strengthens our communities.

$400k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$121k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.6MHealth$397kYouth Development$206kArts & Culture$161kPublic Benefit$107kEducation$93kReligion$58kCivil Rights$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $382,700, the rows itemized in this filing. The $399,562 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,862 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $192k
$15,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF THE SAUK VALLEY$121,000
STERLING ROCK FALLS YMCA$71,000
WHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$40,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF IL$32,500
HOME OF HOPE$21,000
STVINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$17,500
WOODLAWN ARTS ACADEMY$15,800
ROCK RIVER HOSPICE & HOME$15,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY$13,900
WHITE OAKS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN$12,500
STERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE$8,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$7,500
APRIL HOUSE$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%Hospice of the Rock River Val: $15k → 12%ROCK RIVER HOSPICE & HOME: $16k → 13%ROCK RIVER HOSPICE & HOME: $15k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Morrison Community Day Care: $7k → 13%STERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE: $10k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Morrison Community Day Care: $7k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Morrison Community Day Care: $7k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%Sterling Rock Falls Day Care: $10k → 13%STERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 22 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
3

Total granted

$3.8M
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+35%

Still filing today

77%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +118%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +94%
  • HC
    HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +35%
  • TO
    Tri-County Opportunities Coun
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • RF
    ROCK FALLS CIVIC FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Shore Child Care Center Inc

Child care services for community families

Human Services
2
Rock Rapids Kids Club Inc

To provide nurturing and educational childcare services.

Human Services
3
White Birch Community Center Inc

The organization provides the community with childcare services, nursery school, after school programs, youth and senior programs

Education
4
White Plains Childrens Center Inc

A developmental day care center providing care for special needs and non-special needs children.

—
5
Rockford Day Nursery

It is the mission of this corporation to provide quality care for children between the ages of six weeks and twelve years whose parents are employed or in training.

Human Services
6
Senior Services Center of Will County

To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…

—
7
Lakeside Community Committee

To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.

Human Services
8
Woodstock Christian Life Services

To provide healthcare services in a nursing home facility, housing for the elderly, and daycare services for children

Human Services
9
Bucksport Area Child Care Center

It is our mission to provide a child-centered environment, treating each child and family with respect.

Human Services
10
The Children's Center of Cicero-Berwyn

The children's center of cicero-berwyn, inc. is a community-based child care program composed of nine day care sites providing pre-school and school age day care and child development programs in the berwyn and cicero, illinois communities.

Human Services
11
Silver Spring Child Day Care Association Association Inc

Silver springs child care ceter provides full day, full year child care services for up to 47 children ages 2-5. we believe that a warm and caring environment is essential for pre-school age children. our mission is to enhance the social,…

Human Services
12
Rochelle Enrichment Center Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible, child care in a developmentally appropriate learning environment. the program is committed to the holistic development of the individual child through a broad range of educational programs, which…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of Illinois; the most unlike its peers is Sterling Rock Falls Day Care Agency Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: $1,105,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEYSTERLING-ROCK FALLS FAMILY YMCA: $667,000 · OtherSTERLING-ROCK FALLS FAMILY YMCAWHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $346,800 · OtherWHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTERLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $247,400 · OtherLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOISCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOSES OF ROCKFORD: $109,500 · OtherRock Falls Civic Fund: $100,620 · Other+10 more: $336,305 · Other+10 moreROCK RIVER HOSPICE AND HOME: $135,500 · Human ServicesSTERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE AGENCY INC: $88,000 · Human ServicesMORRISON COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $21,000 · Human ServicesHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $181,000 · HealthBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $139,100 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $33,780 · Youth DevelopmentWOODLAWN ARTS ACADEMY: $160,600 · Arts & CultureWHITE OAKS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $92,500 · AnimalsLITERACY IS FUN FOR EVERYONE INC: $63,000 · Education
Other$2,912,625Human Services$244,500Health$181,000Youth Development$172,880Arts & Culture$160,600Animals$92,500Education$63,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: $1,105,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetSTERLING-ROCK FALLS FAMILY YMCA: $667,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetWHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $346,800 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $247,400 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS: $181,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetWOODLAWN ARTS ACADEMY: $160,600 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $139,100 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetROCK RIVER HOSPICE AND HOME: $135,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetWHITE OAKS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $92,500 over 8y, 23% of budgetSTERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE AGENCY INC: $88,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetLITERACY IS FUN FOR EVERYONE INC: $63,000 over 3y, 40% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL: $58,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAPRIL HOUSE: $44,500 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WHITESIDE COUNTY: $43,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS: $33,780 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $33,030 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds STERLING-ROCK FALLS FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds WHITESIDE COUNTY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CANCER WELLNESS CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN ARTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds ROCK RIVER HOSPICE AND HOME ↗
  • Who funds WHITE OAKS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STERLING ROCK FALLS DAY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY IS FUN FOR EVERYONE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROCKFORD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds APRIL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WHITESIDE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds BLACKHAWK AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MORRISON COMMUNITY NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MORRISON COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFESCAPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dillon FoundationIL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dillon Foundation · Sterling Rock Falls Community Trust · Quad Cities Community Foundation · United Way of Lee County Inc · United Way of Rock River Valley · Community Foundation of Northern IL · Kunes Family Foundation · William & Beverly Burkardt Family Foundation Nfp · Do It Best Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Whiteside County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Whiteside County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Whiteside County?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Whiteside County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Whiteside County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph