· Public charity
United Way of Westchester and Putnam Inc
United way of westchester and putnam mobilizes strategic partnerships and leverages resources to create a more equitable community by advancing education, financial stability, and health initiatives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $49,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,968,458 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,918,958 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES | $12,500 |
| CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ASSOCIATION | $8,500 |
| PROJECT MORRY | $7,500 |
| VOLUNTEER NEW YORK | $7,500 |
| NONPROFIT WESTCHESTER | $7,000 |
| WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $246k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC4× · 2017–2020 · $64k · revenue +8%
- WIWesthab Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +360%
- PBPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC3× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- APAMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue -3%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +55%
- PCPUTNAM COMMUNITY CARES INCone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -92%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1991, community housing innovations, inc. (chi) is a not-for-profit organization serving several new york counties. chi's mission is to provide housing and human services that support social and economic independence. chi's…
The children's home of poughkeepsie is one of the oldest child welfare agencies in the nation. on january 21, 1847, a group of poughkeepsie women met to form the female guardian society to care for the poor, abandoned and neglected in…
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
Westchester independent living center ("the center") is the leading community advocate, dedicated to improving the quality of life of people with disabiliities by promoting individual self determination and human rights, societal change…
A-home is a not-for-profit organization that strengthens northern westchester neighborhoods by providing residents a safe and affordable place to live.
Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them
Provide intensive in-home support to developmentally and emotionally disturbed children and adolescents and their families.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
Provides programs dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for people living in poverty, adults with mental illness, victims of domestic violence, children with developmental delays and their families, people living with hiv-aids, and…
Community programs of westchester jewish community services is a non- secretarian, not-for-profit, broad based human service agency dedicated to helping people of all ages cope with emotional, cognitive, environmental, physical, social and…
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keeping Communities Safe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
164 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY OF YONKERS ↗
- Who funds CAREERS SUPPORT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Westhab Inc ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA WHITE PLAINS & CENTRAL WESTCHESTER INC AND ITS AFFILIATES ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC RESOURCE CENTER OF LARCHMONT/MAMARONECK INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds HEARTS AND HOMES FOR REFUGEES ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM COMMUNITY CARES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SHELTER PROGRAM OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds KOOL NERD PREP INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENT ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds PUTNAM FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TIES OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BREWSTER CARES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GREYSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF YONKERS ↗
- Who funds MORRY'S CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER SERVICE BUREAU OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pcsb Community Foundation · Field Hall Foundation · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · The Afya Foundation of America Inc · Impact100 Westchester Inc · The New York Community Trust · St Faith's House Foundation · Mbia Foundation · Phelps Community Foundation Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Westchester and Putnam Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.