Skip to content
United Way of Washtenaw County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Washtenaw County

To connect people, organizations, and resources together to create a thriving community for everyone.

$4.1M
Granted FY2020
122
Grants FY2020
10
States reached
$226k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$3.3MHealth$2.8MEducation$1.7MArts & Culture$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.1MHousing & Shelter$977kCrime & Legal$773kScience & Tech$580kOther$0
02FY2020 · 122 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 122 grants below total $3,866,667, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,110,134 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $243,467 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k28 grants · $176k
  • $10k–50k73 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.0M
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDRF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN$226,225
ATLANTIC COUNCIL$187,500
NEW$131,000
ANN ARBOR ART CENTER$130,414
FOOD GATHERERS$114,380
MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER$100,000
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF WASHTENAW CN$94,341
ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI CHURCH$90,117
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUN$81,558
MICHIGAN THEATRE FOUNDATION$81,000
ANN ARBOR YMCA$80,730
CHILD CARE NETWORK$75,706
JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION$72,000
OZONE HOUSE$70,522
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$69,279
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $20k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $15k → 10%Milan Seniors for Healthy Living: $15k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $15k → 10%AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B: $25k → 8%AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B: $15k → 8%COMMUNITY FAMILY LIFE CENTERS: $20k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $26k → 14%UNITED METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $15k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $12k → 14%FAITH IN ACTION: $11k → 14%Faith In Action: $11k → 14%UNITED METHODIST RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES: $9k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $98k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $87k → 14%SafeHouse Center: $83k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $71k → 14%Ozone House: $58k → 14%SAFEHOUSE CENTER: $48k → 14%SAFEHOUSE CENTER: $48k → 14%SAFEHOUSE CENTER: $40k → 14%Peace Neighborhood Center: $51k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $49k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $43k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $38k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $28k → 14%Womens Center of Southeastern Michigan: $16k → 14%Arbor Hospice: $12k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $12k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%ARBOR HOSPICE: $10k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $188k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $186k → 14%Child Care Network: $183k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $76k → 14%CHILDREN'S LITERACY NETWORK: $13k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $57k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $57k → 14%CHILDREN'S LITERACY NETWORK: $11k → 14%Michigan Ability Partners: $45k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $39k → 14%Children's Literacy Network: $10k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $53k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $44k → 14%SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $39k → 14%SOS Community Services: $37k → 14%OUR HOUSE: $32k → 14%YPSILANTI SENIOR CENTER: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
RI
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 106 repeat orgs$939k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

106 repeat relationships: 78 still active in FY2020, 28 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
27

Total granted

$14M
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
0%

Still filing today

82%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $640k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2017–2020 · $769k · revenue +49%
  • CC
    Child Care Network
    4× · 2017–2020 · $633k · revenue +28%
  • FG
    FOOD GATHERERS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $519k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • WC
    Washtenaw County Office of Community and Economic Developement
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • AC
    AMERICAN COUNCILS FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION ACTR ACCELS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +33%
  • US
    UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
4
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
5
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
6
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
7
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
8
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
9
Center for Family Health

The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.

Health
10
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
11
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

—
12
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ohorizons Charitable Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
53
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/138
Grantees still filing
103/138
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County: $540,302 · OtherCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw CountyFOOD GATHERERS: $518,909 · OtherFOOD GATHERERSCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $484,306 · OtherCORNER HEALTH CENTERREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $478,368 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANWashtenaw Intermediate School District: $319,232 · OtherMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $314,848 · OtherAnn Arbor Young Men's Christian Association: $267,550 · OtherATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $387,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN: $331,236 · OtherNonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc: $374,183 · Other+86 more: $3,896,684 · Other+86 moreChild Care Network: $633,339 · Human ServicesChild Care Networ…OZONE HOUSE INC: $318,702 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE INCDomestic Violence Project: $218,843 · Human ServicesDomestic Violence…MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $198,899 · Human ServicesMICHIGAN ABILITY …COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $181,739 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION …Peace Neighborhood Center: $180,720 · Human ServicesPeace Neighborhoo…SOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $173,316 · Human ServicesSOS COMMUNITY SER…+17 more: $503,933 · Human Services+17 moreMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $358,842 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN THE…Ann Arbor Art Association: $358,030 · Arts & CultureAnn Arbor Ar…YANKEE AIR MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $290,070 · Arts & CultureYANKEE AIR M…THE EDISON INSTITUTE INC: $222,450 · Arts & CultureTHE EDISON I…The Ark: $202,827 · Arts & CultureThe ArkDiplomacy Center Foundation: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $133,723 · Arts & Culture+8 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $769,025 · HealthBREAKTHROU…Packard Health Inc: $210,705 · HealthPackard He…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $141,847 · HealthPLANNED PA…HOME OF NEW VISION: $69,883 · HealthDawn Incorporated: $59,880 · HealthWASHTENAW HEALTH PLAN: $50,000 · Health+6 more: $72,341 · HealthFoundations Preschool of Washtenaw County: $339,320 · EducationWASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $248,565 · EducationGERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $92,000 · EducationMENTOR2YOUTH INC: $58,667 · EducationEASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $54,855 · EducationEMERSON SCHOOL INC: $40,298 · EducationALMA COLLEGE: $33,000 · Education+6 more: $89,750 · EducationELE'S PLACE INC: $188,518 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS GROUP: $90,547 · Youth DevelopmentGROWING HOPE INC: $88,402 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral Zone: $69,363 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN: $46,114 · Youth DevelopmentGirls on the Run of Southeastern Michigan: $20,495 · Youth Development+3 more: $34,483 · Youth DevelopmentMichigan Advocacy Program: $484,487 · Crime & LegalWE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$7,913,118Human Services$2,409,491Arts & Culture$1,625,942Health$1,373,681Education$956,455Youth Development$537,922Crime & Legal$514,487

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $769,025 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChild Care Network: $633,339 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetCatholic Social Services of Washtenaw County: $540,302 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetFOOD GATHERERS: $518,909 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMichigan Advocacy Program: $484,487 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCORNER HEALTH CENTER: $484,306 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $387,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc: $374,183 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $358,842 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAnn Arbor Art Association: $358,030 over 4y, 17% of budgetFoundations Preschool of Washtenaw County: $339,320 over 4y, 14% of budgetFISHER HOUSE MICHIGAN: $331,236 over 3y, 20% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC: $318,702 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetYANKEE AIR MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $290,070 over 4y, 16% of budgetAnn Arbor Young Men's Christian Association: $267,550 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC: $257,810 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC: $253,285 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetWASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $248,565 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetTHE EDISON INSTITUTE INC: $222,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDomestic Violence Project: $218,843 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetPackard Health Inc: $210,705 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetThe Ark: $202,827 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetMICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $198,899 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC: $188,518 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS: $186,426 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSHELTER ASSOCIATION OF WASHTENAW COUNTY: $182,989 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $181,739 over 4y, 15% of budgetPeace Neighborhood Center: $180,720 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetSOS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $173,316 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $156,507 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $141,847 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFriends In Deed: $111,669 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ANN ARBOR: $108,479 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetWASHTENAW LITERACY: $105,662 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetAVALON NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION: $102,518 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGERALD R FORD PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION: $92,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGIRLS GROUP: $90,547 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE: $89,204 over 3y, 20% of budgetGROWING HOPE INC: $88,402 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetTHE JAMES BEARD FOUNDATION INC: $87,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $83,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $82,323 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROMISE SCHOOLS: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEARTHSHARE: $71,748 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF HURON VALLEY: $71,354 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOME OF NEW VISION: $69,883 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNeutral Zone: $69,363 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY: $65,736 over 4y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ann Arbor Area Commun…Harry a and Margaret …Community Foundation …United Way for Southe…James a and Faith Kni…Trinity Health - Mich…DTE Energy FoundationFood GatherersDuffy FoundationThe Martin Family Fou…Michigan Health Endow…Thrift Shop Associati…
Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI171.5× affinity87 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Trinity Health - Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Food Gatherers · Duffy Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Washtenaw County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Washtenaw County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • United Way Suncoast Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $260k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of Washtenaw County’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home