Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Vermillion

Uniting people and resources to build a stronger community.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$191kHuman Services$175kCrime & Legal$78kYouth Development$54kHealth$53kEducation$36kArts & Culture$7kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $86,338, the rows itemized in this filing. The $106,796 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,458 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$701k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAIN STREET CENTER$16,000
Southeast Public Transit$13,000
Southeast CASA Program$12,000
USD Vucurevich Children's Center$12,000
Boys & Girls Club of Vermillion$10,000
Dollywood Foundation$8,838
Habitat for Humanity of Clay & Yankton Counties$7,500
USD Scottish Rite Speech & Hearing Clinic$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Southeast CASA Program: $12k → 11%Southeast CASA Program: $8k → 11%MAIN STREET CENTER: $16k → 20%Southeast CASA: $7k → 11%Southeast CASA: $7k → 11%MAIN STREET CENTER: $14k → 20%Main Street Center: $11k → 20%Main Street Center: $11k → 20%Main Street Center: $9k → 20%Main Street Center: $8k → 20%SOUTHEAST CASA: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of United Way of Vermillion’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in SD; by stated purpose, 86%.

United Way of Vermillionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$630k · 13 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$630k
$41k

Still filing today

85%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FV
    FEEDING VERMILLION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $71k · revenue +1%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF VERMILL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +88%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $64k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • VF
    Vermillion Food Pantry
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
  • VC
    VUCUREVICH CHILDREN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • VF
    VERMILLION FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Dakota Coalition Ending Domestic and Sexual Violence

To provide training and assistance to shelters for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

—
2
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
3
Sierra County Child Abuse Council

Child abuse awareness and prevention

Crime & Legal
4
Sos Inc

SOS is a nonprofit agency that empowers and advocates for adults or children affected by sexual and domestic violence, stalking, human trafficking, child abuse and neglect. This work is done through four programs - Crisis Services, CASA of…

—
5
Casa of Vermilion County

To provide trained community volunteers to aid in making decisions in ocourt about abused and neglected children's lives

Crime & Legal
6
Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc

To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.

—
7
Siouxland Community Soup Kitchen

The purpose of the corporation is to provide food and meals to those in need.

—
8
Stoddard County Transit Services Inc

Provide transportation to handicapped individuals and senior citizens.

—
9
Lakota Child Care Center

Provide safe, affordable childcare to the area.

Human Services
10
Lewis and Clark Behavioral

To provide a broad spectrum of mental health services to residents of south dakota

Health
11
Southeastern Oklahoma Family Services Inc

Provide mental health counseling to needy families and persons in south central Oklahoma

Recreation & Sports
12
Second Chance Dv Sa Shelter

Assist individuals and families experiencing domestic abuse and sexual assault by providing crisis intervention and a full range of support services. second chance also works to emplower the community to understand and prevent the crimes…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helpline Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $82,000 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITYWELCOME TABLE INC: $58,000 · OtherWELCOME TABLE INCTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $51,500 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAFE OPTIONS SVCS: $50,500 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAFE OPTIONS SVCSRURAL OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES: $37,500 · OtherRURAL OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICESVermillion Food Pantry: $24,000 · OtherVermillion Food PantryHELPLINE CENTER INC: $18,112 · OtherYankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit: $13,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY: $12,500 · Other+2 more: $17,000 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF VERMILL: $68,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS S…SOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM: $39,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST CASA PR…FEEDING VERMILLION: $70,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING VER…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC: $64,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…Sesdac Inc: $47,000 · HealthCENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $31,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$364,112Human Services$107,500Food & Nutrition$70,500Youth Development$64,000Health$47,000Recreation & Sports$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING VERMILLION: $70,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF VERMILL: $68,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC: $64,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $51,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAFE OPTIONS SVCS: $50,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetSesdac Inc: $47,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM: $39,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetRURAL OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES: $37,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $31,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetHELPLINE CENTER INC: $18,112 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit: $13,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY: $12,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING VERMILLION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF VERMILL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SAFE OPTIONS SVCS ↗
  • Who funds Sesdac Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST CASA PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds RURAL OFFICE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds HELPLINE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Yankton Transit Inc dba Southeast Public Transit ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF YANKTON COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

South Dakota Community FoundationSD17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Vermillion funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Vermillion. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Vermillion?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Vermillion through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Vermillion’s filings →

    More from the funding graph