Skip to content

South Dakota · Nonprofit

FEEDING VERMILLION

FEEDING VERMILLION (South Dakota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,339 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF VERMILLION ($70,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$334k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$92k
Net assets
$413k
3/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Feeding Vermillion does

Mission

Feeding Vermillion is a non-profit corporation that strives to relieve hunger and increase self sufficiency for those in need in Clay County, South Dakota.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Vermillion Food Pantry provides monthly groceries to families in need.

    $207,073 spent$188,818 earned by the program
    79% of program spending
  2. The Welcome Table provides a weekly free community meal to the public.

    $9,787 spent$6,816 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  3. Tanager Feeding programs, including Tanager Shopping, Tanager Delivery, Brain Boost, and Back-to-School Backpack programs support families and classrooms in the Vermillion School District with supplemental groceries, nutritious snacks, and school supplies.

    $46,589 spent$30,747 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $263,449.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($233k) Expenses 100 ($238k) Net assets 100 ($84k)2018 Revenue 124 ($290k) Expenses 125 ($297k) Net assets 83 ($71k)2019 Revenue 142 ($331k) Expenses 128 ($305k) Net assets 177 ($149k)2020 Revenue 153 ($358k) Expenses 118 ($281k) Net assets 268 ($227k)2021 Revenue 122 ($285k) Expenses 105 ($250k) Net assets 310 ($262k)2022 Revenue 102 ($238k) Expenses 101 ($240k) Net assets 308 ($260k)2023 Revenue 103 ($241k) Expenses 87 ($206k) Net assets 345 ($292k)2024 Revenue 131 ($305k) Expenses 120 ($287k) Net assets 432 ($365k)2025 Revenue 143 ($334k) Expenses 120 ($287k) Net assets 489 ($413k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (143)Expenses (120)Net assets (489)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $71k to $149k (+112%).

$84k
$71k
$149k
$227k
$262k
$260k
$292k
$365k
$413k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 2% · 2024 0% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of FEEDING VERMILLION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,394 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$5k
’17
−$7k
’18
$26k
’19
$77k
’20
$35k
’21
−$2k
’22
$34k
’23
$18k
’24
$48k
’25
17
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed6699111311911
Joined·+2+5+0+7+4+6+0+2
No longer listed·22052820
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $16k → $25k.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$71k
$14k
funders
1
5
4
2
3
2
2

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FEEDING VERMILLION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 5 of 6 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FEEDING VERMILLION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FEEDING VERMILLION.

76%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 66% · 2021 99% · 2022 66% · 2023 99% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of FEEDING VERMILLION's grant income comes from South Dakota funders.

MN
SD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
South Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FEEDING VERMILLION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,059 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin14% · above the median
Months of reserve17.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,059 food & nutrition nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like FEEDING VERMILLION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Dakota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FEEDING VERMILLION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FEEDING VERMILLION?
FEEDING VERMILLION (South Dakota) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,339 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF VERMILLION ($70,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FEEDING VERMILLION have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $92,339 in grants to FEEDING VERMILLION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FEEDING VERMILLION?
UNITED WAY OF VERMILLION is the largest funder on record, with $70,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FEEDING VERMILLION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Feeding Vermillion →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing