Skip to content
United Way of the Midlands at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

United Way of the Midlands

UNITED WAY OF THE MIDLANDS mission is "we unite our community's caring spirit to build a stronger tomorrow".

$9.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$504k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$30MHealth$17MYouth Development$13MHousing & Shelter$11MEmployment$4.4MFood & Nutrition$3.2MEducation$2.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 84 grants below total $7,532,097, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,920,974 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,388,877 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k42 grants · $4.4M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.0M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES$503,557
ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$397,000
NEBRASKA CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION$360,492
HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE$286,132
FAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES INC$252,000
OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE$250,000
COMPLETELY KIDS$240,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC$229,000
HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION$190,132
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA$175,000
KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER$175,000
WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT$169,500
YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA$165,000
LATINO CENTER OF THE MIDLANDS$145,500
NEW VISIONS$145,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Kids Can Community Center: $225k → 12%KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $220k → 12%Kids Can Community Center: $220k → 12%Kids Can Community Center: $190k → 12%Kids Can Community Center: $190k → 12%OMAHA RAPID RESPONSE: $250k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $257k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $218k → 12%Urban League of Nebraska Inc: $488k → 12%Urban League of Nebraska Inc: $364k → 12%Urban League of Nebraska Inc: $364k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA INC: $280k → 12%Urban League of Nebraska Inc: $280k → 12%Urban League of Nebraska Inc: $255k → 12%Metropolitan Area Continuum of Care for the Homele: $500k → 12%Child Saving Institute: $210k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $844k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $657k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $657k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $616k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $511k → 12%YMCA of Greater Omaha: $483k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $483k → 12%Lutheran Family Services of Nebraska Inc: $481k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $384k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $296k → 12%YMCA of Greater Omaha: $296k → 12%TOGETHER INC OF METRO OMAHA: $264k → 12%YMCA of Greater Omaha: $240k → 12%LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NEBRASKA INC: $229k → 12%YMCA of Greater Omaha: $215k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $1.1M → 12%Heartland Family Service: $824k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $824k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $700k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $639k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $600k → 12%Heartland Family Service: $574k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $358k → 12%HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $286k → 12%Women's Center for Advancement: $289k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $253k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $237k → 12%Women's Center for Advancement: $216k → 12%Women's Center for Advancement: $216k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $255k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $200k → 12%HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $190k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87M · 116 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

116 repeat relationships: 78 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

116
26

Total granted

$87M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

86%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $195k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +39%
  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +55%
  • OC
    ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.7M · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • TC
    THRESHOLD COC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +5%
  • NC
    NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -39%
  • BT
    BOOK TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $183k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Community Justice Center

A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.

Crime & Legal
3
North Omaha Collective

To build the capacity of youth serving organizations, service providers, families and community to claim their voice, cultivate healing and take courageous action to improve their overall health and well being.

Human Services
4
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
7
New Community Development Corporation

Provides safe, affordable and quality housing for low and moderate income families in Douglas & Sarpy NE & Pottawattamie County IA, with an emphasis in Omaha/Council Bluffs metropolitan area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
9
Educare of Lincoln Inc

To help young children thrive socially, emotionally and academically through high-quality early childhood education, and in partnership with their families and the community.

Education
10
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
11
Nebraska Credit Union League Inc

To promote credit unions in nebraska

—
12
Nebraska Safety Council

Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Aid of Nebraska; the most unlike its peers is Somali Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
123/130
Grantees still filing
86/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $5,894,009 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICELUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $4,867,993 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INCURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $2,405,800 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKAYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $2,161,500 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHAWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1,915,100 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENTKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,769,200 · Human ServicesKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTERTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1,387,200 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,347,200 · Human ServicesTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $1,263,000 · Human Services+28 more: $7,456,418 · Human Services+28 moreVisiting Nurse Association: $3,885,172 · OtherVisiting Nurse AssociationONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,721,789 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH C…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $1,670,300 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE A…THE SALVATION ARMY: $1,480,896 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS: $946,000 · Other+58 more: $10,176,806 · Other+58 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $3,570,200 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $2,720,600 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPO…COMPLETELY KIDS: $2,234,975 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KI…GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $641,900 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS S…Partnership 4 Kids Inc: $390,800 · Youth Development+4 more: $795,025 · Youth Development+4 moreFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES: $4,581,200 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY HOUSI…SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $2,424,432 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCI…STEPHEN CENTER INC: $895,632 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENT…MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $743,000 · Housing & ShelterMICAH HOUSE …HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $445,000 · Housing & Shelter+7 more: $476,300 · Housing & ShelterCOMBINED HEALTH AGENCIES DRIVE: $5,022,160 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $221,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $420,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION: $1,898,386 · EducationAFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN: $1,244,350 · EducationCollective For Youth: $510,953 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $433,310 · EducationDEFY VENTURES INC: $287,000 · EducationD2 CENTER INC: $256,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC: $227,400 · EducationMETROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $215,000 · EducationSIMPLE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Education+4 more: $272,568 · EducationCHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC: $1,939,700 · HealthCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,283,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $1,185,157 · HealthEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $425,000 · HealthCENTER FOR HOLISTIC DEVELOPMENT: $230,861 · HealthSANTA MONICA INC: $217,400 · Health+1 more: $25,000 · Health
Human Services$30,467,420Other$21,880,963Youth Development$10,353,500Housing & Shelter$9,565,564Philanthropy$5,863,160Education$5,544,967Health$5,306,118

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE: $5,894,009 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCOMBINED HEALTH AGENCIES DRIVE: $5,022,160 over 9y, 36% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC: $4,867,993 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES: $4,581,200 over 9y, 22% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $3,721,789 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $3,570,200 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $2,720,600 over 9y, 12% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $2,424,432 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA: $2,405,800 over 9y, 16% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $2,234,975 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $2,161,500 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetCHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC: $1,939,700 over 9y, 31% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $1,915,100 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetNEBRASKA CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION: $1,898,386 over 7y, 67% of budgetKIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $1,769,200 over 9y, 12% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $1,670,300 over 9y, 10% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $1,387,200 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $1,347,200 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetCHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,283,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA: $1,263,000 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN: $1,244,350 over 9y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $1,185,157 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS: $946,000 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC: $941,700 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $895,632 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetHEARTLAND HOPE MISSION: $776,532 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetMICAH HOUSE CORPORATION: $743,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetFAMILY INC: $735,000 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA: $655,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $641,900 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetHEART MINISTRY CENTER: $634,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $626,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetMIDLANDS LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $550,730 over 9y, 26% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $530,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCollective For Youth: $510,953 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTHRESHOLD COC: $500,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $484,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNO MORE EMPTY POTS: $450,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF OMAHA INC: $445,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $444,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $433,310 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS NEBRASKA: $425,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetWHISPERING ROOTS INC: $420,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC: $411,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetPartnership 4 Kids Inc: $390,800 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $385,259 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC: $363,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $329,500 over 9y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEARTLAND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds COMBINED HEALTH AGENCIES DRIVE ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY SERVICES OF NE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSING ADVISORY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds CHICANO AWARENESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CENTER FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES DREW HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER INC OF METROPOLITAN OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN AMERICAN EMPOWERMENT NETWORK IN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MICAH HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds HEART MINISTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDLANDS LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Collective For Youth ↗
  • Who funds THRESHOLD COC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…Mutual of Omaha Found…Weitz Family Foundati…Nebraska Community Fo…Immanuel Community Vi…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Leland J & Dorothy H …The Hawks FoundationSuzanne & Walter Scot…Todd and Mary Heistan…Peter Kiewit Foundati…
The Lozier FoundationNE159.8× affinity81 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Immanuel Community Vision Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Midlands funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Midlands. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Financial Beginnings: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on United Way of the Midlands’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home