Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of the Golden Triangle Region

Our mission is to empower sustained changes in education, health, and financial stability of our community.

$427k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MYouth Development$734kFood & Nutrition$383kPublic Safety & Disaster$259kEducation$132kHousing & Shelter$118kEmployment$91kHealth$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $378,480, the rows itemized in this filing. The $427,230 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $171k
$19,740
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE$60,050
YMCA$58,350
CONTACT HELPLINE$52,800
LOWNDES COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$48,000
HELPING HANDS$36,045
AMERICAN RED CROSS$26,000
SALVATION ARMY$19,740
4-H CLUB FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI$18,140
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL$16,905
SAFE HAVEN$15,350
LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK$10,000
THE FATHER'S CHILD MINISTRY$9,000
GIRL SCOUTS - HEART OF THE SOUTH$8,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $659k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%YMCA: $65k → 19%YMCA: $58k → 19%YMCA: $57k → 19%YMCA: $57k → 19%YMCA: $57k → 19%YMCA: $43k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $38k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $37k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $37k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $37k → 19%YMCA: $34k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $34k → 19%YMCA: $29k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $26k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 18 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$3.2M
$41k

Still filing today

72%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $401k · revenue +189%
  • FP
    FRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +7%
  • GT
    GOLDEN TRIANGLE CONTACT TELEMINISTRY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $387k · revenue +482% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FAMILY ENRICHMENT CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • LC
    LOWNDES COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • SG
    SAVING GRACE MISSION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest Alabama Inc

The boys and girls club of southwest alabama actively works with local youth of all backgrounds to develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and future leaders in our community.

Youth Development
2
Girl Scouts of Southern Alabama

To provide volunteer support & training, and the girl scout leadership program within thirty counties in southern alabama.

—
3
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

—
4
Grand Teton Council of the Boy Scouts of America Inc

The boy scouts of america -- incorporated on february 8, 1910, and chartered by congress in 1916.the boy scouts of america has one mission, which extends to all local councils:"the corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by…

Youth Development
5
Boy Scouts of America 98 South

Provides programs for boys and girls that encourage individual growth.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of North Central Georgia

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boy Scouts of America 98 South Georgia Council Tr Fund

Provides programs for boys and girls that encourage individual growth.

—
8
Girl Scout Council of Colonial Coast

Girl scout council of colonial coast, a united way agency, serves girls in grades k-12, in southeastern virginia and northeastern north carolina. our mission is to build girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a…

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Club of Southeast Louisiana

The mission of the boys & girls clubs of southeast louisiana is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring,responsible citizens.

—
10
Girl Scouts of La-Pines to the Gulf (Formerly Bayou Girl Scout Councilinc)

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Club of West Alabama Inc

To enable all young people especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, responsible citizens

—
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of Cooke County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential, as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boy Scouts of America Natchez Trace Council; the most unlike its peers is Safe Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOWNDES COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $382,600 · OtherLOWNDES COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGHELPING HANDS OF COLUMBUS INC: $262,232 · OtherHELPING HANDS OF COLUMBUS INCSALVATION ARMY - BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA AREA COMMAND: $179,340 · OtherSALVATION ARMY - BIRMINGHAM ALABAMA AREA COMMAND4-H CLUB FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI INC: $121,042 · Other4-H CLUB FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI INCRECOVERY HOUSE INC: $117,893 · OtherRECOVERY HOUSE INCSAFE HAVEN INC: $98,426 · OtherSAFE HAVEN INCBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 691 PUSHMATAHA: $98,300 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 691 PUSHMATAHASALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $88,910 · OtherSALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC+6 more: $94,418 · Other+6 moreFRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA: $399,850 · Human ServicesFRANK P PHILLIPS MEMOR…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $259,050 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …GOLDEN TRIANGLE CONTACT TELEMINISTRY INC: $386,950 · HealthGOLDEN TRIANGLE …THE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC: $80,000 · HealthTHE LAST HOUSE O…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE: $401,476 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $60,400 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF T…GREATER COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER: $120,440 · EducationFATHER'S CHILD MINISTRY: $91,176 · EmploymentCREATE FOUNDATION: $9,600 · Philanthropy
Other$1,443,161Human Services$658,900Health$466,950Youth Development$461,876Education$120,440Employment$91,176Philanthropy$9,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE: $401,476 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetFRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA: $399,850 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetGOLDEN TRIANGLE CONTACT TELEMINISTRY INC: $386,950 over 8y, 59% of budgetLOWNDES COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $382,600 over 8y, 58% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF COLUMBUS INC: $262,232 over 8y, 25% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $259,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budget4-H CLUB FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI INC: $121,042 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetGREATER COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER: $120,440 over 3y, 23% of budgetRECOVERY HOUSE INC: $117,893 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetSAFE HAVEN INC: $98,426 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 691 PUSHMATAHA: $98,300 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetFATHER'S CHILD MINISTRY: $91,176 over 8y, 24% of budgetSALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC: $88,910 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC: $80,000 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $60,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL: $33,005 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION: $9,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds FRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN TRIANGLE CONTACT TELEMINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWNDES COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RECOVERY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 691 PUSHMATAHA ↗
  • Who funds FATHER'S CHILD MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds SALLY KATE WINTERS FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Paper Company FoundationTN23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Paper Company Foundation · 4-County Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Golden Triangle Region funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Golden Triangle Region. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Golden Triangle Region’s filings →

    More from the funding graph