Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

4-County Foundation Inc

The mission of 4-county foundation, inc.

$378k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$306kPublic Safety & Disaster$274kHuman Services$123kPublic Benefit$116kArts & Culture$87kCrime & Legal$69kReligion$66kCommunity Improvement$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 35 grants below total $316,995 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $377,684 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $60,689 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $177k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $140k
$9,163
Median grant
2
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLDEN TRIANGLE THEATER$20,000
LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERVISORS VOLUNTEE$10,000
UNA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC$10,000
UNITED WAY OF LOWNDES AND NOXUBEE C$10,000
THE MISSION INC$10,000
PRAIRIE DARROCOTT FIRE AND RESCUE$10,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$10,000
PHEBA AREA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMEN$10,000
CHOCTAW COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
TOWN OF MATHISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT$10,000
CITY OF STARKVILLE MISSISSIPPI$10,000
THE CREATE FOUNDATION FORGE FOUNDA$10,000
CENTRAL CLAY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTM$10,000
BYWY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$9,998
Individual grant recipient$9,900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%FRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA: $9k → 19%MENNONITE SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 28%MENNONITE SERVICE CENTER: $8k → 28%MENNONITE SERVICE CENTER: $6k → 28%FRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$565k · 27 repeat orgs$892k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +207% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
84

Total granted

$565k
$655k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+207%
+27%

Still filing today

19%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $237k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MISSION INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $44k · revenue +207%
  • TD
    THE DREAM CENTER OF COLUMBUS INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +687%
  • GT
    GOLDEN TRIANGLE THEATRE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +239%

Funded once

  • WC
    WEBSTER COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • LC
    LIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +186%
  • GT
    Golden Triangle Outdoors Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
2
Okeechobee Christian Academy Inc

An inter-denominational school that exists to serve all in the okeechobee area by providing an education that is christ-centered, bible-based, and academically distinguished.

Education
3
Columbus Christian Academy Inc

To provide Christian education to the community in which we reside. To educate students while teaching them the Word of God.

Education
4
Christian Mission Centers Inc

The christian mission centers seeks to meet the mental, physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of all people to whom we minister.

5
Community Development and Education

The mission of the center is to enrich the lives of individuals by providing christian education, christian counseling,child care and benevolent services.

Human Services
6
Emmanuel Christian School Inc

To provide daycare, Christian education and training for students

Education
7
The Covenant School of Jacksonville

The covenant school of jacksonville, inc., is dedicated to offering a quality christian education for kindergarten through 12th grade students in jacksonville, florida.

Education
8
Lowcountry Christian Community School

To provide a biblically based k-8 school which partners with a community of likeminded families to foster moral and academic excellence, equipping our children to serve god, each other, and the community at large.

Education
9
Mercy Christian Academy

Our mission is to bear witness to the mercies of christ by providing a high-quality, christian education to shreveport families, regardless of income.

Education
10
Community Child Development Center Inc

The organization provides quality care and education to 50 children in macon county and surrounding areas

Education
11
Homes of Hope for Children Inc

To serve children in crisis throughout mississippi by providing strong, christian homes to every child who lives on campus while ensuring that each child is loved unconditionally and has their physical, spiritual, and emotional needs met.

Human Services
12
New Hope Community Christian School Inc

Educational services

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Golden Triangle Theatre and the most unlike its peers is Mennonite Service Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+125 more — $1,232,469 · Other+125 moreTHE MISSION INC — $43,939 · ReligionTHE DREAM CENTER OF COLUMBUS INC — $36,233 · ReligionGOLDEN TRIANGLE THEATRE — $35,203 · Arts & CulturePRAIRIE BELT BLUES FOUNDATION — $8,640 · Arts & CultureCREATE FOUNDATION — $32,700 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE REGION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMENNONITE SERVICE CENTER — $22,000 · Human ServicesFRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA — $14,560 · Human ServicesLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $12,248 · HealthGolden Triangle Outdoors Inc — $10,000 · HealthTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC — $10,000 · HealthCLAY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $8,763 · EducationColumbus Christian Academy Inc — $5,040 · EducationMISSISSIPPI CODING ACADEMIES — $8,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,232,469Religion$80,172Arts & Culture$43,843Philanthropy$42,700Human Services$36,560Health$32,248Education$13,803Science & Tech$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MISSION INC — $43,939 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetTHE DREAM CENTER OF COLUMBUS INC — $36,233 over 3y, 14% of budgetGOLDEN TRIANGLE THEATRE — $35,203 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCREATE FOUNDATION — $32,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE SERVICE CENTER — $22,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetFRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA — $14,560 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC — $12,248 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGolden Triangle Outdoors Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetOKTIBBEHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION D/B/A STARKVILLE ACADEMY — $9,958 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLAY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $8,763 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CODING ACADEMIES — $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF COLUMBUS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetColumbus Christian Academy Inc — $5,040 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MISSION INC
  • Who funds THE DREAM CENTER OF COLUMBUS INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN TRIANGLE THEATRE
  • Who funds CREATE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MENNONITE SERVICE CENTER
  • Who funds FRANK P PHILLIPS MEMORIAL YMCA
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Golden Triangle Outdoors Inc
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE REGION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Paper Company FoundationTN17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Paper Company Foundation · United Way of the Golden Triangle Region · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 4-County Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 4-County Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to 4-County Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph