Skip to content
United Way of the Eastern Panhandle at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of the Eastern Panhandle

To inspire and mobilize our community to create change.

$695k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.2MFood & Nutrition$832kAnimals$653kHealth$509kYouth Development$460kHousing & Shelter$355kCrime & Legal$280kEducation$97kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 29 grants below total $647,872, the rows itemized in this filing. The $695,148 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $47,276 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $295k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $277k
$11,368
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORSES WITH HEARTS$98,710
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PA$62,622
MEALS ON WHEELS BERKELEY COUNTY$62,128
CASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE$53,963
CCAP LOAVES & FISHES$46,990
TELEMON CORPORATION$46,000
COMMUNITY MARKETS$40,893
BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES$23,619
STARTING POINTS$20,836
JC COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$19,047
COMMUNITY NETWORKS$14,447
STARS THAT SHINE$14,224
GOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC$12,661
NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE$12,488
FAITH COMMUNITY COALITION$11,368
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TELEMON CORPORATION: $46k → 8%WV COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 15%TELEMON CORPORATION: $46k → 8%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $23k → 9%TELEMON CORPORATION: $30k → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD: $21k → 9%TELEMON CORPORATION: $30k → 8%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $20k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $24k → 11%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $20k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $23k → 11%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $19k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $22k → 11%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $16k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $22k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD: $13k → 9%MC HOMELESS COALITION: $14k → 16%SHEPHERDSTOWN DAYCARE CENTER: $13k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $19k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD: $12k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $19k → 11%GOOD SHEPHERD: $11k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $19k → 11%MC HOMELESS COALITION: $14k → 16%GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 9%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $18k → 11%BERKELEY SENIOR SERVICES: $17k → 11%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $16k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $16k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $15k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $15k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $13k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $12k → 9%CHILDREN FIRST CHILD DEV CENTER: $11k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS EASTERN PANHAND: $10k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARTITIES OF WV: $40k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $26k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARTITIES OF WV: $23k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARTITIES OF WV: $23k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $20k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $20k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $20k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $17k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARTITIES OF WV: $14k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $13k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $12k → 11%NORBORNE PRESCHOOL & DAYCARE: $12k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARTITIES OF WV: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 46 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
10

Total granted

$4.6M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+18%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    HORSES WITH HEARTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $529k · revenue +217% · 38% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +114%
  • BC
    BERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $309k · revenue +198%

Funded once

  • FF
    FAITH FEEDING FREEDOM
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • MP
    MARTINSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY COMM A CORP CREATED BY ORD OF COUNC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • E
    EPIC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Berkeley County Humane Society

Animal welfare

Animals
3
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
4
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
5
Jefferson County Council On Aging Inc

To provide in home services, para-nursing services, nutritional meals, transportation, and other various services to the elderly of Jefferson and Berkley Counties located in WV.

Human Services
6
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
7
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
8
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
9
Mountainheart

Mountainheart community services, inc. provides services to the low income and elderly citizens of west virginia through head start, child care, right from the start, weatherization, birth to three and in-home care programs.

Community Improvement
10
Mountaineer Community Health Center

To provide primary medical care service in a rural community.

Health
11
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
12
The Council of Senior Tyler Countians Inc

Provide hot meals to senior citizens. provide home health care services to the elderly. provide respite care for alzheimers patients. provide transportation for senior citizens. provide social and recreational activities for senior…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Coalition to End Homelessness Inc; the most unlike its peers is Morgan County Homeless Coalition in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/46
Grantees still filing
31/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $308,909 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INCBERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC: $255,132 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPER…SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $102,137 · OtherSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INCTELEMON CORPORATION I & R: $85,039 · OtherTELEMON CORPORATION I & RJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $66,504 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES CENTER INC: $65,450 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF BERKELEY COUNTY: $62,870 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $149,462 · OtherBERKELEY COUNTY BACKPACK PROGRAM INCCommunity Alternatives to Violence Inc: $65,228 · Other+22 more: $428,233 · Other+22 moreBERKELEY COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $181,864 · Human ServicesBERKELEY COUNTY COMMITTEE O…TELAMON CORPORATION: $159,906 · Human ServicesTELAMON CORPORATIONNORBORNE PRE-SCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER INC: $147,509 · Human ServicesNORBORNE PRE-SCHOOL AND DAY…SHEPHERDSTOWN DAY CARE INC: $132,932 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDSTOWN DAY CARE INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $121,987 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIR…CHEERS SCHOOL FAMILY INC HERITAGE SCHILD DEVELOPMENT CEN: $115,960 · Human ServicesCHEERS SCHOOL FAMILY INC HE…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $101,561 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY…GOOD SHEPHERD INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC: $83,149 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD INTERFAITH VO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $41,306 · Human Services+3 more: $73,777 · Human Services+3 moreHORSES WITH HEARTS INC: $528,591 · AnimalsHORSES WITH H…ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $29,516 · Animals+1 more: $14,285 · AnimalsSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $182,885 · HealthSHENANDOAH…PANHANDLE HOME HEALTH INC: $154,464 · HealthPANHANDLE …GOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC: $78,232 · HealthGOOD SAMAR…+1 more: $9,629 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $331,739 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY: $23,061 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON …Girl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $20,410 · Youth DevelopmentSTARS THAT SHINE: $14,224 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $216,492 · Crime & LegalMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $102,513 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY NETWORKS INC: $175,637 · Housing & ShelterFAITH COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $110,862 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,588,964Human Services$1,159,951Animals$572,392Health$425,210Youth Development$389,434Crime & Legal$319,005Housing & Shelter$286,499

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORSES WITH HEARTS INC: $528,591 over 9y, 38% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $331,739 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $308,909 over 9y, 13% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC: $255,132 over 9y, 9.6% of budgetCASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $216,492 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I: $182,885 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC: $181,864 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY NETWORKS INC: $175,637 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetTELAMON CORPORATION: $159,906 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPANHANDLE HOME HEALTH INC: $154,464 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetBERKELEY COUNTY BACKPACK PROGRAM INC: $149,462 over 9y, 13% of budgetNORBORNE PRE-SCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER INC: $147,509 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetSHEPHERDSTOWN DAY CARE INC: $132,932 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $121,987 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHEERS SCHOOL FAMILY INC HERITAGE SCHILD DEVELOPMENT CEN: $115,960 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetFAITH COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $110,862 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC: $102,513 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetSHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $102,137 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $101,561 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC: $83,149 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC: $78,232 over 5y, 17% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $66,504 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCommunity Alternatives to Violence Inc: $65,228 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC: $51,970 over 6y, 13% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $41,306 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $37,925 over 3y, 13% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION IN: $33,230 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PANHANDLE INC: $32,283 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $29,516 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetBLACKCAT MUSIC COOPERATIVE: $26,248 over 3y, 15% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY: $23,061 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetMORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INC: $20,903 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetFOR LOVE OF CHILDREN: $20,547 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $20,410 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC: $15,121 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSTARS THAT SHINE: $14,224 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetFAITH FEEDING FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $12,732 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetTHE MARTINSBURG INITIATIVE INC: $9,629 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPOTOMAC VALLEY AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $7,547 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HORSES WITH HEARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY CONGREGATIONAL COOPERATIVE ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY MEDICAL SYSTEM I ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY NETWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds TELAMON CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE HOME HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY COUNTY BACKPACK PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds NORBORNE PRE-SCHOOL AND DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDSTOWN DAY CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEERS SCHOOL FAMILY INC HERITAGE SCHILD DEVELOPMENT CEN ↗
  • Who funds FAITH COMMUNITY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD INTERFAITH VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Alternatives to Violence Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Community Markets Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION IN ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PANHANDLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BLACKCAT MUSIC COOPERATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern West Virginia…Roy and Gwen Steeley …Bowles Rice FoundationShepherd University F…The Greater Cincinnat…Truist West Virginia …Give Back FoundationDan Ryan Builders Cha…Bernard McDonough Fou…Encova Foundation of …Rotary Club of Charle…Community Education G…
Eastern West Virginia Community FoundationWV84.6× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern West Virginia Community Foundation · Roy and Gwen Steeley Foundation Inc · Bowles Rice Foundation · Shepherd University Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Give Back Foundation · Dan Ryan Builders Charitable Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Rotary Club of Charles Town Charitable Foundation · Community Education Group Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of the Eastern Panhandle funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of the Eastern Panhandle. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of the Eastern Panhandle’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home