Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY

GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY (Virginia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $105,204 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE ($23,061). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$169k
Funders on record
11
Grants received
$105k
Net assets
$253k
6/11 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What Girls on the Run of the Shenandoah Valley does

Mission

Inspire girls to be joyful, healthy and confident using a fun, experience-based curriculum which creatively integrates running.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Partner with local schools to provide 12-week programs in the fall and spring to promote physical and emotional well-being to young girls in the community.

    $155,083 spentof which $22,777 as grants$69,482 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $155,083.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($99k) Expenses 100 ($82k) Net assets 100 ($125k)2018 Revenue 147 ($145k) Expenses 173 ($141k) Net assets 104 ($130k)2019 Revenue 212 ($209k) Expenses 228 ($186k) Net assets 123 ($153k)2020 Revenue 203 ($200k) Expenses 259 ($211k) Net assets 114 ($142k)2021 Revenue 156 ($154k) Expenses 159 ($130k) Net assets 139 ($174k)2022 Revenue 208 ($205k) Expenses 209 ($171k) Net assets 162 ($202k)2023 Revenue 170 ($167k) Expenses 201 ($164k) Net assets 167 ($208k)2024 Revenue 153 ($151k) Expenses 208 ($170k) Net assets 160 ($200k)2025 Revenue 171 ($169k) Expenses 165 ($135k) Net assets 202 ($253k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (171)Expenses (165)Net assets (202)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $202k to $260k (+29%).

$125k
$130k
$153k
$167k
$191k
$202k
$209k
$202k
$260k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 1% · 2021 15% · 2022 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

55% of GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,387 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
’17
$4k
’18
$23k
’19
−$11k
’20
$24k
’21
$35k
’22
$3k
’23
−$19k
’24
$34k
’25
16
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Annoica Ingram

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9131091313161616
Joined·+5+1+3+5+0+13+3+3
No longer listed·144101033
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $7k → $5k.

5 of 11 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

96% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY.

22%
largest funder
57%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 93% · 2020 100% · 2021 55% · 2022 32% · 2023 98% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 4 states in all.

MO
WV
VA
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’22
’23
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,482 youth development nonprofits its size.

Operating margin20% · top quartile
Months of reserve16.0mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,482 youth development nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY?
GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY (Virginia) receives grants from 11 organizations whose IRS filings report $105,204 to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE ($23,061). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 11 organizations giving $105,204 in grants to GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY?
UNITED WAY OF THE EASTERN PANHANDLE is the largest funder on record, with $23,061 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Girls on the Run of the Shenandoah Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 11 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing