Skip to content
United Way of Stanly County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Stanly County Inc

The UNITED WAY OF STANLY COUNTY INC works with public and private sectors through a system of agencies and programs by raising and allocating funds and planning for the delivery of needed human services.

$176k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Human Services$160kHousing & Shelter$157kHealth$103kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kReligion$20k
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $158,573, the rows itemized in this filing. The $175,988 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,415 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $152k
$18,252
Median grant
1
States reached
$356k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY$22,865
STANLY COUNTY YMCA$20,150
STANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY$20,060
HOMES OF HOPE$19,116
TILLERY COMPASSIONATE CARE$18,252
STANLY CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$18,200
JOHN MURRAY COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC$18,027
RESCUE UNIT OF STANLY COUNTY$15,075
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,828
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%TILLERY COMPASSIONATE CARE: $18k → 13%HOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $12k → 13%HOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $11k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$476k · 10 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$476k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
0%

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JP
    JOHN P MURRAY COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $61k · revenue +21%
  • EH
    ESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $59k · revenue +14%
  • SC
    STANLY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $51k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • OI
    OASIS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue 0% · 28% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stanton Hospitality House

Stanton hospitality house provides accomodations to families who need to stay near loved ones undergoing treatment at area healthcare facilities.

—
2
Stanly County Humane Society

Humane education and the adoption of homeless animals.

Animals
3
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House provides a place where homeless inividuals can stay to recover from surgery or other illnesses. All homless individuals are referred to Samaritan house from any one of the Charlotte area hospitals.

Housing & Shelter
4
Lighthouse of Stanly Foundation Llc
International
5
Stanly Health Foundation

Partnering with atrium health stanly to improve the health of everyone in our community.

Health
6
Habitat for Humanity of Randolph County

Habitat for humanity works in partnership with god and with people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building and renovating houses so they are decent houses in decent communities in…

—
7
Carolina Comfort Coalition

Serenity House is a community organization that bridges the gap for hospice families by providing a three bed group home setting at no charge for short term end of life care by trained volunteers and nurses.

—
8
Secu Family House At Unc Hospitals

Secu family house at unc hospitals provides an affordable, safe, nurturing home away from home for seriously ill patients, their family members, and caregivers from throughout north carolina and beyond.

Health
9
Anson County Homes of Hope

Provide short-term housing for homeless

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Relief Organization of Mt Holly Nc

Mt Holly CRO is a United Way agency. It provides food and limited household goods for men, women and children in the community. It also offers financial assistance for electric, rent, and water.

—
11
Darlington County Habitat for Humanity Inc

To provide affordable housing for low-income families in darlington county, sc

Housing & Shelter
12
Santiam Memorial Hospital

Santiam memorial hospital's mission is to provide quality health care to persons suffering from illness, injuries, or disabilities and to promote the general health and welfare of the community through education, support, and medical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John P Murray Community Care Clinic Inc; the most unlike its peers is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STANLY COUNTY YMCA: $63,918 · OtherSTANLY COUNTY YMCACRISIS ASSISTANCE FUND OF STANLY CO: $57,865 · OtherCRISIS ASSISTANCE FUND OF STANLY COSTANLY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,847 · OtherSTANLY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYStanly County: $30,027 · OtherStanly CountySTANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC: $20,060 · OtherSTANLY COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INCESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $58,560 · Housing & ShelterESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY …HOMES OF HOPE INC: $47,455 · Housing & ShelterHOMES OF HOPE INCHOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $41,203 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF STAN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,453 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…OASIS INC: $8,040 · Human ServicesOASIS INCJOHN P MURRAY COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $61,347 · HealthJOHN P MURRAY…Rescue Unit of Stanly County Inc: $45,315 · Public Safety & DisasterRescue Uni…
Other$222,717Housing & Shelter$106,015Human Services$68,696Health$61,347Public Safety & Disaster$45,315

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHN P MURRAY COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC: $61,347 over 3y, 22% of budgetESTHER HOUSE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $58,560 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetSTANLY COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,847 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE INC: $47,455 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetRescue Unit of Stanly County Inc: $45,315 over 3y, 18% of budgetHOSPICE OF STANLY COUNTY INC: $41,203 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $19,453 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS INC: $8,040 over 1y, 28% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the Ca…Amazonsmile Foundation
Foundation for the CarolinasNC12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Stanly County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Stanly County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $121k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Stanly County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home