Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Spencer

UNITED WAY OF SPENCER distributes funds to local charities that have been collected in an organized concise manner from the public during its annual fund drive.

$369k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$166k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$981kCrime & Legal$317kPublic Safety & Disaster$279kCommunity Improvement$207kArts & Culture$43kYouth Development$25kReligion$18kEducation$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $341,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $369,340 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,340 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $221k
$12,750
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE$166,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$55,000
UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY$30,000
OUTREACH OF SPENCER$17,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$14,250
CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$12,750
CAASA$10,000
ATLAS OF SPENCER$8,250
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$8,000
LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA$7,000
ARTS ON GRAND$6,250
TRINITY PRESCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–26, $628k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $8k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $48k → 14%GRAND AVENUE OUTREACH: $183k → 9%GRAND AVENUE OUTREACH: $27k → 9%GRAND AVENUE OUTREACH: $24k → 9%CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $21k → 9%OUTREACH OF SPENCER: $18k → 9%CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $13k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $10k → 9%SPENCER FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 9%SPENCER FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 9%SPENCER FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $8k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $8k → 9%ATLAS OF SPENCER: $7k → 9%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $7k → 9%LUTHERAN SERVICES OF IOWA: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 23 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2026, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$2.2M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

52%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE
    4× · 2023–2026 · $746k · revenue +148%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2023–2026 · $250k · revenue +22%
  • CC
    CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    2× · 2024–2026 · $34k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR PETS
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crisis Intervention Services Inc

Provide support, resources, and hope for a better future to persons affected by domestic abuse, sexual assault and other crisis.

Human Services
2
Crossroads of Crawford County Inc

Crossroads of crawford county is a christian outreach for the people and communities in crawford county, in iowa. it seeks to match people with resources which fit their personal or family needs while encouraging and supporting them though…

Human Services
3
The Diversity Service Center of Iowa

Immigration counseling and advocacy for minority senior citizens

Human Services
4
Central Iowa Shelter & Services

The organization endeavors to provide safe emergency and transitional shelter and meals to homeless adults along with resource assistance to move clients beyond homelessness and toward independent living.

Housing & Shelter
5
Iowa Community Action Association

Educating, advocating for, and connecting community action agencies to amplify a unified voice in service of iowans facing economic hardship.

Human Services
6
Guardians of Northeast Iowa Inc

To provide guardianship and trustee services to vulnerable individuals in iowa. services also include representative payee.

Human Services
7
Niad Center for Human Development Inc

The mission of crisis intervention service (cis) is to provide persons affected by domestic violence, sexual assault and homicide with professional, confidential, 24-hour services including safety and support and to prevent violence in our…

—
8
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
9
Central Iowa Juvenile Detention Center

To provide a highly structured environment which emphasizes a safety and security to all juveniles while serving as a deterrent to criminal and anti-social behaviors. Working youth in the center and communities.

—
10
Iowa Aces 360

To improve the health and well-being of all by empowering communities, organizations, and people to take informed actions to prevent and mitigate the lifelong effects of childhood adversity.

Health
11
Des Moines Area Association of Realtors Foundation
Education
12
Iowa Association of Community Action Directors

To assist in the provision of a better life for iowa's low-income residents, through assistance to the community action organization located within the state.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Services in Iowa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Atlas of Spencer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $326,500 · OtherCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSAHARTLEY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION: $112,500 · OtherHARTLEY IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $84,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SIO SIOUX CITY: $52,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SI…HARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,800 · Other+11 more: $164,954 · Other+11 moreHARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $746,000 · EducationHARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCAREGRAND AVENUE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $251,115 · Human ServicesGRAND AVENUE COMMUNITY OUTREACHAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $249,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & I…CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $33,500 · Human ServicesATLAS OF SPENCER: $32,750 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF SPENCER IOWA: $27,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $22,000 · Human Services+1 more: $12,500 · Human ServicesUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $102,400 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE FOR PETS: $6,300 · Animals
Other$796,754Education$746,000Human Services$628,365Community Improvement$102,400Animals$6,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE: $746,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA: $326,500 over 3y, 28% of budgetGRAND AVENUE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $251,115 over 4y, 49% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $249,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $102,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SIO SIOUX CITY: $52,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $33,500 over 2y, 16% of budgetATLAS OF SPENCER: $32,750 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF SPENCER IOWA: $27,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetARTS ON GRAND: $23,750 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC: $22,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PETS: $6,300 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARTLEY COMMUNITY DAYCARE ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SIO SIOUX CITY ↗
  • Who funds CLAY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ATLAS OF SPENCER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC OF SPENCER IOWA ↗
  • Who funds ARTS ON GRAND ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR PETS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Siouxland Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Spencer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Spencer. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Spencer?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Spencer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Spencer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph