Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Southern Wv Inc

United way is working to advance the common good by focusing on education, income and health.

$595k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Human Services$504kHealth$402kCrime & Legal$185kEmployment$100kHousing & Shelter$37kFood & Nutrition$37kAnimals$37kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $159,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $594,896 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $435,396 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$876k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RALEIGH CO COMMISSION ON AGING$45,000
CHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY$22,500
BECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT$17,500
BIG CREEK PEOPLE ACTION$15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV$12,500
LILLIAN JAMES LEARNING CENTER$12,000
MCDOWELL COMMISSION ON AGING$10,000
GABRIEL PROJECT$10,000
BLAND MINISTRIES CENTER & DENTAL CENTER$9,000
HOSPICE OF SOUTHERN WV$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $294k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $13k → 15%RALEIGH CO COMMISSION ON AGING: $45k → 20%REACHH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $14k → 23%MCDOWELL COUNTY COMM ON AGING: $11k → 25%NICHOLAS STARTING POINTS: $6k → 18%REACHH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 23%STOP ABUSIVE FAMILY ENVIROMENTS: $11k → 25%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV: $7k → 15%MCDOWELL COMMISSION ON AGING: $10k → 25%MCDOWELL CO COMMISSION ON AGING: $9k → 25%STOP ABUSIVE FAMILY ENVIRONMENT: $7k → 25%MCDOWELL COMMISSION ON AGING: $7k → 25%RALIEGH COUNTY COMMMISSION ON THE A: $26k → 20%LOAVES AND FISHES (CCS): $7k → 21%RALIEGH COUNTY COMMMISSION ON THE A: $25k → 20%RALIEGH COUNTY COMMMISSION ON THE A: $22k → 20%RALIEGH CO COMMUNITY ACTION: $14k → 20%RALEIGH CO COMMISSION ON AGING: $11k → 20%PINE HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER: $9k → 20%SUMMERS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $11k → 20%SUMMERS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 20%SUMMERS COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of United Way of Southern Wv Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in WV; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

United Way of Southern Wv Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 26 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$1.2M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+77%

Still filing today

81%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    RALEIGH COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $129k · revenue +84%
  • BS
    BRIANS SAFEHOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $102k · revenue +23%
  • JF
    JUST FOR KIDS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $99k · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $41k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • NR
    NEW RIVER HEALTH SCHOOL BASED HEAL
    one grant, 2017 · $27k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
3
Family Counseling Connection Inc

Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.

4
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
5
Crisis Center of Russell County

The Crisis Center of Russell County was organized to provide assistance and temporary housing to victims of domestic abuse through secured temporary housing and education with job placement to transition them back into society. In…

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

7
Appalachian Childrens Center Inc

Serve abused and/or neglected children in the Gilmer County area via counseling and other social services.

Recreation & Sports
8
Westcare Kentucky Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
9
Jefferson County Council On Aging Inc

To provide in home services, para-nursing services, nutritional meals, transportation, and other various services to the elderly of Jefferson and Berkley Counties located in WV.

Human Services
10
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc

Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
11
Lewis County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Serve the senior citizens of Lewis County, WV

Human Services
12
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reachh Family Resource Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr12%4%5–10yr15%8%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr24%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr12%2%5–10yr15%3%10–20yr16%54%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr24%8%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
12%
182/1,558

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $99,570 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOSPICE OF SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INC — $59,050 · OtherHOSPICE OF SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INCBIG CREEK PEOPLE IN ACTION INC — $56,745 · OtherBIG CREEK PEOPLE IN ACTION INCLILLIAN JAMES LEARNING CENTER INC — $42,775 · OtherLILLIAN JAMES LEARNING CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient — $41,107 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SPARROW'S NEST — $36,581 · OtherCHILD PROTECTION OF MERCER COUNTY — $36,050 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER — $33,410 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $30,119 · OtherMERCER COUNTY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $29,855 · OtherPINE HAVEN HOMELESS SHELTER — $28,665 · OtherNEW RIVER HEALTH SCHOOL BASED HEAL — $26,750 · OtherNEW RIVER HEALTH — $25,000 · Other+18 more — $157,077 · Other+18 moreBRIANS SAFEHOUSE INC — $102,351 · HealthBRIANS SAFEHOUSE INCBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT INC — $94,935 · HealthBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT …New River Health Association Inc — $35,373 · HealthNew River Health Asso…DAVIS-STUART INC — $28,750 · HealthDAVIS-STUART INCGABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA — $15,425 · HealthTHE SPARROWS NEST — $14,120 · Health+1 more — $5,175 · HealthRALEIGH COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC — $128,963 · Human ServicesRALEIGH COUNTY COMMIS…McDowell County Commission on Aging Inc — $36,525 · Human ServicesMcDowell County Commi…Summers County Council on Aging Inc — $29,350 · Human ServicesSummers County Counci…REACHH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $26,140 · Human ServicesREACHH FAMILY RESOURC…RALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $22,725 · Human ServicesRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUN…CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WE…S A F E INC — $17,560 · Human ServicesS A F E INC+2 more — $13,257 · Human ServicesJUST FOR KIDS INC — $99,473 · Crime & LegalJUST FOR K…CHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC — $49,497 · Crime & LegalCHILD PROT…BECKLEY DREAM CENTER INC DBA FISHES AND LOAVES — $88,935 · Food & NutritionWESTMINSTER AT WADE INC — $17,055 · Youth DevelopmentBLAND MINISTRY CENTER — $16,000 · ReligionWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER — $8,825 · Social Science
Other$702,754Health$296,129Human Services$294,020Crime & Legal$148,970Food & Nutrition$88,935Youth Development$17,055Religion$16,000Social Science$8,825

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRALEIGH COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING INC — $128,963 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBRIANS SAFEHOUSE INC — $102,351 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetJUST FOR KIDS INC — $99,473 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetBECKLEY HEALTH RIGHT INC — $94,935 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBECKLEY DREAM CENTER INC DBA FISHES AND LOAVES — $88,935 over 4y, 23% of budgetHOSPICE OF SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INC — $59,050 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBIG CREEK PEOPLE IN ACTION INC — $56,745 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC — $49,497 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetLILLIAN JAMES LEARNING CENTER INC — $42,775 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMcDowell County Commission on Aging Inc — $36,525 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNew River Health Association Inc — $35,373 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERCER COUNTY FELLOWSHIP HOME INC — $29,855 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSummers County Council on Aging Inc — $29,350 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDAVIS-STUART INC — $28,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetREACHH FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $26,140 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetRALEIGH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $22,725 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $19,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetS A F E INC — $17,560 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWESTMINSTER AT WADE INC — $17,055 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBLAND MINISTRY CENTER — $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA — $15,425 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE SPARROWS NEST — $14,120 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CHRISTIAN ACTION INC — $12,420 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetNourish Up — $7,079 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAINELLE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $5,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beckley Area Foundation IncWV26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beckley Area Foundation Inc · Hugh I Shott Jr Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · K B Tierney Charitable Foundation Trust · Carter Family Foundation · Skewes Family Foundation · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Southern Wv Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $664k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph