· Public charity
United Way of South Central Nebraska Inc
Fund raising for other non-profit organizations
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k12 grants · $278k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASA | $60,000 |
| CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES | $50,000 |
| YWCA | $46,000 |
| ENCOURAGE ADVOCACY CENTER (SASA) | $39,500 |
| HASTINGS LITERACY | $30,000 |
| MENTORINGWORKS | $26,000 |
| HORIZON RECOVERY DBA REVIVE INC | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBRASKA | $25,000 |
| KENESAW UNITED CHILDCARE COALITION | $25,000 |
| SENIOR ACTION | $17,700 |
| BOY SCOUTS | $13,500 |
| ASAAP | $10,500 |
| THE VALLEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $10,000 |
| TEAMMATES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA8× · 2017–2024 · $438k · revenue +0%
- CSCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $426k · revenue +20%
- SASPOUSE ABUSESEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $250k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- KUKENESAW UNITED CHILD CARE COALITIONone grant, 2021 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.
The nebraska casa association partners with local casa programs to recruit and train volunteers who speak in court for the safety and well-being of abused and neglected children.
Provide education and leadership to empower people to live safe and healthy.
Mission: community action of nebraska strives to alleviate poverty through enhancing program development, providing technical assistance, and advocating public policy to support all community action agencies in nebraska.
The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.
The organization's mission is to expand the world of possibilities for aging through advocacy, collaboration, and education.
The organization supports and promotes court appointed volunteer advocacy for abused and neglected children so they can thrive in safe permanent homes.
Child abuse awareness and prevention
The mission of midland area agency on aging is to provide caring and quality services to older adults and their families that enable independent living with dignity in their homes and communities.
Southeast Nebraska Casa recruits, trains and supports community volunteers who advocate forabused and neglected children in the Seward, Saline, Thayer, Jefferson and Gage County Court System
A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.
Volunteers of america-lewellen, nebraska is a faith-based organization whose mission is to promote physical, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual well-being serving children, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spouse Abusesexual Assault Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Revive Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MENTORING WORKS ↗
- Who funds SPOUSE ABUSESEXUAL ASSAULT CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS LITERACY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR ↗
- Who funds MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REVIVE INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds 322 OVERLAND TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AREA SUBSTANCE & ALCOHOL ABUSE PREVENTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds TEAMMATES MENTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds KENESAW UNITED CHILD CARE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VALLEY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hastings Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Spotts Trust Charles Hermes Trustee · Sunnyside Inc · LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Johnson-Wissing Family Foundation Inc · Snow Redfern Memorial Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of South Central Nebraska Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.