· Public charity
Sunnyside Inc
The mission of sunnyside since 1912 is to provide for the health, education and social welfare needs of the adams county, nebraska community, including the elderly, through the distribution of grants derived from entrusted funds.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $173,777 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $205,890 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,113 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARY LANNING HEALTHCARE | $93,073 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA | $19,590 |
| CROSSROADS | $17,170 |
| REVIVE INC | $10,944 |
| SPECIAL SCOOPS II | $10,000 |
| HPS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $7,000 |
| ST MARKS EPISCOPAL PRO-CATHEDRAL CHURCH DBA LAUNDRY LOVE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $259k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION8× · 2018–2025 · $540k · revenue +28%
- COCASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA8× · 2017–2024 · $157k · revenue +0%
- CCCROSSROADS CENTER INC6× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- HCHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue 0%
- HSHASTINGS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $19k
- SHSOUTH HEARTLAND HEALTH DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the city of hastings, nebraska.
The hastings community foundation works to perpetuate and enrich the quality of life in hastings and the surrounding area through the prudent investment and management of philanthropic donations.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
A restorative justice agency committed to habilitating justice in nebraska.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.
Heartland of Story County offers life-enriching opportunities for older adults and provides support for their families and caregivers.
To provide healthcare and other related services for aging persons regardless of the ability of residents to pay for these services.
Support the state's federally qualified health centers in providing accessible and quality health care.
Hospice provides care from the heart to fulfill the unique needs of patients and families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Partnership of Mid-Nebr and the most unlike its peers is Revive Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE MARY LANNING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL NEBRASKA INC ↗
- Who funds REVIVE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HASTINGS NEBRASKA ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL BEHAVIORAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MIRIAMS HOPE ↗
- Who funds Creighton University ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds SOS SWIM HASTINGS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hastings Community Foundation Inc · LeRoy Thom Jean Thom and T-L Foundation · The Graff Charitable Foundation Inc Co P Mark Graff · United Way of South Central Nebraska Inc · Johnson-Wissing Family Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Spotts Trust Charles Hermes Trustee · Greater Grand Island Community Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sunnyside Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sunnyside Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sunnyside Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.