Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Scotland County Inc

To raise funds for various charitable organizations within the community.

$155k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$263kYouth Development$190kHealth$185kFood & Nutrition$174kHuman Services$149kEducation$104kAnimals$100kCommunity Improvement$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $146,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $154,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$493k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$25,000
GIFT OF LOVE FOOD PANTRY OF LAUREL$15,000
CHURCH AND COMMUNITY$15,000
PROJECT IN AS MUCH$15,000
SCOTLAND CO HUMANE SOCIETY$12,000
LUMBER RIVER COUNCIL OF GOVERMENTS$10,000
SCOTLAND COUNTY 4H$8,000
SCOTS FOR YOUTH$8,000
SCOTLAND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT$8,000
SCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER$5,000
MY META REENTRY SERIVCES INC$5,000
SCOTLAND COUNTY SPECIAL OLYPICS$5,000
SCOTLAND COUNTY SENIOR GAMES$5,000
PARTNERS IN MINISTRIES$5,000
SCOTLAND CO PARTNERSHIP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICE: $25k → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICE: $20k → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICE: $16k → 24%CHURCH AND COMMUNITY: $15k → 24%CHURCH AND COMMUNITY: $15k → 24%CHURCH AND COMMUNITY: $15k → 24%CHURCH AND COMMUNITY: $15k → 24%CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICE: $15k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 18 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$1.3M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +103% · 25% of their budget
  • PI
    PROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +49% · 31% of their budget
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $103k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • SC
    SCOTLAND COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SC
    SCOTLAND CO LITERACY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scotland County Economic Development Corporation

To promote the growth of the local economy of Scotland County and City of Laurinburg through job creation, the investment in business property and infrastructure to facilitate economic growth and job creation.

Employment
2
Scotland Youth Development Act-So

To provide mentoring, educational, and physical activities for scotland county, nc at risk youth in a safe and secure enviroment.

Youth Development
3
Scotland Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Scotland County Senior Center Inc

Provide meals for senior citizens

—
5
Family Promise of Scotland County Inc

Provide shelter to homeless families in scotland county and provide training to these families so that they may become self sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
6
Scotlandville Community Develo Corporation

To provide affordable housing to the residents of north baton rouge and participate in outreach programs in baton rouge.

Community Improvement
7
Scots On the Rocks
Arts & Culture
8
Stewart County Fire and Rescue

Our mission is to prevent and curtail the destruction of property by fire and to aid in the preservation of life, health, and property by providing emergency and non-emergency services to the citizens of Stewart County.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
10
Southeastern Community Action Partnership Inc

To improve and empower the lives of the people that we serve. to accomplish our mission, we help people help themselves by providing services which enables them to develop marketable skills, reduce barriers to employment, teach living…

Human Services
11
Scotland Memorial Hospital Inc

To provide safe, high quality, compassionate, and sustainable health care to the people we serve.

Health
12
United Way of Scotland County Inc

To raise funds for various charitable organizations within the community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scots for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is My Meta Re-Entry Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $192,600 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSCOTS FOR YOUTH INC: $68,155 · OtherSCOTS FOR YOUTH INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FINDLAYHANCOCK COUNTY: $68,138 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FINDLAYHANCOCK COUNTYScotland Community Health Clinic: $62,000 · OtherScotland Community Health ClinicScotland County Public Safety and Emergency Services Association Inc: $60,000 · OtherScotland County Public Safety and Emergency Services Associa…NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $48,000 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYSCOTLAND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $45,470 · OtherSCOTLAND YOUTH DEVELOPMENTScotland County Literacy Council: $44,500 · OtherScotland County Literacy CouncilSCOTLAND COUNTY: $41,766 · OtherSCOTLAND COUNTYGIFT OF LOVE FOOD PANTRY OF LAUREL HILL NORTH CAROLINA: $38,800 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC: $36,400 · Other+5 more: $33,000 · OtherCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $135,944 · Human ServicesCHURCH COMM…PROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC: $135,135 · Food & NutritionPROJECT IN-…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $103,055 · HealthDOMESTIC …SCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $10,045 · HealthSCOTLAND …SCOTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $99,930 · AnimalsLUMBER RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $80,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNERS IN MINISTRY: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSCOTLAND COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $66,006 · Education
Other$738,829Human Services$135,944Food & Nutrition$135,135Health$113,100Animals$99,930Community Improvement$85,000Education$66,006

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $135,944 over 8y, 25% of budgetPROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC: $135,135 over 8y, 31% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC: $103,055 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetSCOTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $99,930 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetLUMBER RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $80,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetSCOTS FOR YOUTH INC: $68,155 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetSCOTLAND COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $66,006 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetScotland Community Health Clinic: $62,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetScotland County Public Safety and Emergency Services Association Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC: $36,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $10,045 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN MINISTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMBER RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SCOTS FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Scotland Community Health Clinic ↗
  • Who funds Scotland County Public Safety and Emergency Services Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Scotland County Literacy Council ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds MY META RE-ENTRY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morgan Foundation IncNC22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morgan Foundation Inc · Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Scotland County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Scotland County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Scotland County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph