· Public charity
United Way of Scotland County Inc
To raise funds for various charitable organizations within the community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $146,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $154,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $25,000 |
| GIFT OF LOVE FOOD PANTRY OF LAUREL | $15,000 |
| CHURCH AND COMMUNITY | $15,000 |
| PROJECT IN AS MUCH | $15,000 |
| SCOTLAND CO HUMANE SOCIETY | $12,000 |
| LUMBER RIVER COUNCIL OF GOVERMENTS | $10,000 |
| SCOTS FOR YOUTH | $8,000 |
| SCOTLAND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT | $8,000 |
| SCOTLAND COUNTY 4H | $8,000 |
| SCOTLAND COUNTY SPECIAL OLYPICS | $5,000 |
| SCOTLAND COUNTY SENIOR GAMES | $5,000 |
| SCOTLAND CO PARTNERSHIP | $5,000 |
| SCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER | $5,000 |
| MY META REENTRY SERIVCES INC | $5,000 |
| PARTNERS IN MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $136k · revenue +103% · 25% of their budget
- PIPROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC8× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +49% · 31% of their budget
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC7× · 2017–2023 · $103k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- SCSCOTLAND COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k
- SCSCOTLAND CO LITERACY COUNCILone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the growth of the local economy of Scotland County and City of Laurinburg through job creation, the investment in business property and infrastructure to facilitate economic growth and job creation.
To provide mentoring, educational, and physical activities for scotland county, nc at risk youth in a safe and secure enviroment.
Volunteer fire department
Provide meals for senior citizens
Provide shelter to homeless families in scotland county and provide training to these families so that they may become self sufficient.
To provide affordable housing to the residents of north baton rouge and participate in outreach programs in baton rouge.
Our mission is to prevent and curtail the destruction of property by fire and to aid in the preservation of life, health, and property by providing emergency and non-emergency services to the citizens of Stewart County.
Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…
To improve and empower the lives of the people that we serve. to accomplish our mission, we help people help themselves by providing services which enables them to develop marketable skills, reduce barriers to employment, teach living…
To provide safe, high quality, compassionate, and sustainable health care to the people we serve.
To raise funds for various charitable organizations within the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scots for Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is My Meta Re-Entry Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT IN-AS-MUCH LAURINBURG NC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF SCOTLAND COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds LUMBER RIVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SCOTS FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Scotland Community Health Clinic ↗
- Who funds Scotland County Public Safety and Emergency Services Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Scotland County Literacy Council ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTLAND FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SCOTLAND COUNTY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds MY META RE-ENTRY SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morgan Foundation Inc · Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Scotland County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.