Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Rockingham County Inc

To raise money for county 501(c)3 organizations.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$2.2MHuman Services$813kYouth Development$399kPublic Safety & Disaster$131kCrime & Legal$110kArts & Culture$37kRecreation & Sports$22k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $476k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$59,247
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOSPICE OF ROCK CO$1,512,500
ROCK CO SALVATION ARMY$267,723
AGING DISABILITY AND TRANSIT SERVI$188,777
EDEN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$111,812
REIDSVILLE RESCUE SQUAD$59,709
EDEN RESCUE SQUAD$59,247
MADISONMAYODAN RESCUE$56,710
ROCK CO STUDENT HEALTH CNTR$17,240
HELP INC$13,120
EDEN YMCA$12,300
MADISONMAYODAN REC$10,000
REIDSVILLE YMCA$6,741
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $119k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Eden YMCA: $14k → 17%EDEN YMCA: $14k → 17%EDEN YMCA: $14k → 17%EDEN YMCA: $12k → 17%Eden YMCA: $9k → 17%REIDSVILLE YMCA: $13k → 17%Reidsville YMCA: $13k → 17%REIDSVILLE YMCA: $13k → 17%Reidsville YMCA: $9k → 17%REIDSVILLE YMCA: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$3.7M
$0

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +38%
  • AD
    AGING DISABILITY & TRANSIT SERVICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $276k · revenue +17%
  • UR
    UNC ROCKINGHAM HEALTH CARE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $145k · revenue +2%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Roanoke Valley Rescue Squad Inc

    Provide emergency medical services, emergency medical trasportation, and search and rescue of missing persons.

    Health
    2
    North Iredell Rescue Squad Inc

    Rescue Services

    Public Safety & Disaster
    3
    York Regional Emergency Medical Services Inc

    York Regional EMS is an ambulance service organization committed to providing quality emergency medical services to four regional municipalities with a primary response area estimated to be 29 square miles and a corresponding population of…

    4
    Farmville Rescue & Emergency Medical Services Inc

    Emergency Medical Services

    Health
    5
    Richmond County Rescue Squad

    Provide rescue and ambulance services

    6
    Redington-Fairview General Hospital

    Redington-fairview general hospital's mission is to develop, provide, and facilitate quality, safe, comprehensive, cost-effective health services for the people we serve. we affirm a commitment to maintain our unique community hospital…

    Health
    7
    Randolph Regional Ems Corporation

    The mission of Randolph Regional EMS Corporation is to provide the best Emergency care possible servicing our community better.

    Health
    8
    Regional Ambulance Service Inc

    Our mission is serving people first with pride, proficiency and professionalism. We offer emergency, ambulance, and paramedic services for Rutland City and surrounding towns in Vermont.

    Health
    9
    Easton-Greenwich Rescue Squad Inc

    Provision of ambulance and other emergency services to the citizens of Easton and Greenwich, NY and adjoining communities including Salem, Cossayuna, and Schaghticoke.

    Health
    10
    Essex Rescue Inc

    Essex Rescue is committed to being a leader in EMS and to providing our community with excellence in pre-hospital and out of hospital care. We strive for this by maintaining the highest standards of our profession, caring for our patients,…

    Health
    11
    Rockaway Citizens Safety Patrol Inc

    We are a volunteer emergency response group engaged in patrolling the community to help deter crime and keep the streets safe. we work in close collaboration with the nypd and ncpd, acting as a liaison between the community and the police.…

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Ash-Rand Rescue Squad & Ems Inc

    Emergency and resecue services to randalph county, north carolina.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unc Rockingham Health Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Help Inc Center Against Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    5/9
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    HOSPICE OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY INC — $1,751,629 · OtherHOSPICE OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY INCTHE SALVATION ARMY — $397,656 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAGING DISABILITY & TRANSIT SERVICES — $275,582 · OtherAGING DISABILITY & TRANSIT SERVICESReidsville Rescue Squad Inc — $130,785 · OtherHELP INC CENTER AGAINST VIOLENCE — $109,640 · Other+2 more — $88,766 · OtherEDEN RESCUE SQUAD INCORPORATED — $174,596 · HealthEDEN RESCUE S…UNC ROCKINGHAM HEALTH CARE INC — $144,830 · HealthUNC ROCKINGHA…Madison-Rockingham Rescue Squad Inc — $109,573 · HealthMadison-Rocki…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EDEN INC — $389,094 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GI…Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc — $119,397 · Human Services
    Other$2,754,058Health$428,999Youth Development$389,094Human Services$119,397

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOSPICE OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY INC — $1,751,629 over 5y, 16% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EDEN INC — $389,094 over 5y, 49% of budgetAGING DISABILITY & TRANSIT SERVICES — $275,582 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetEDEN RESCUE SQUAD INCORPORATED — $174,596 over 5y, 18% of budgetUNC ROCKINGHAM HEALTH CARE INC — $144,830 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetReidsville Rescue Squad Inc — $130,785 over 5y, 48% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc — $119,397 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHELP INC CENTER AGAINST VIOLENCE — $109,640 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMadison-Rockingham Rescue Squad Inc — $109,573 over 5y, 13% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HOSPICE OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY INC
    • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EDEN INC
    • Who funds AGING DISABILITY & TRANSIT SERVICES
    • Who funds EDEN RESCUE SQUAD INCORPORATED
    • Who funds UNC ROCKINGHAM HEALTH CARE INC
    • Who funds Reidsville Rescue Squad Inc
    • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc
    • Who funds HELP INC CENTER AGAINST VIOLENCE
    • Who funds Madison-Rockingham Rescue Squad Inc

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Reidsville Area FoundationNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Reidsville Area Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization United Way of Rockingham County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph